
Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. The decision marked a reversal of the separate but equal doctrine from Plessy v. Ferguson, which had permitted separate schools for whites and non-whites provided that the facilities were equal. The case was argued on December 9, 1952, and reargued on December 8, 1953, to address the question of whether the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment would have understood it to be inconsistent with racial segregation in public education. On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9–0 decision in favor of the plaintiffs, ruling that 'separate educational facilities are inherently unequal and therefore laws that impose them violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Date | May 17, 1954 |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Decision | Unanimous (9-0) |
| Ruling | Racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional, violating the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution |
| Precedent Overruled | Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) |
| Principle Rejected | "Separate but equal" |
| Plaintiffs' Attorney | Thurgood Marshall |
Explore related products
$224.99
What You'll Learn

The Fourteenth Amendment
The Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education was underpinned by the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which prohibits states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. By segregating white and African American children in public schools based solely on race, the Court found that the state was denying African American children their right to equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling overturned the longstanding "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which had permitted segregation as long as the facilities provided were equal.
The impact of the Fourteenth Amendment in Brown v. Board of Education extended beyond the realm of public education. The Court's interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause set a precedent that influenced other areas of law and policy. The ruling implied that segregation was not permissible in other public facilities beyond schools, signalling the end of legalized racial segregation in the United States. This interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment catalysed the expanding civil rights movement of the late 1950s and 1960s, inspiring legal challenges to racial segregation and discrimination in various aspects of American life.
While the Fourteenth Amendment was a powerful tool in the fight for civil rights, it is important to note that its history and interpretation are complex. The Amendment's impact on public education, in particular, was the subject of debate, with some scholars arguing that the Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education went against legal tradition. Nonetheless, the Fourteenth Amendment, as interpreted in this case, became a cornerstone of civil rights law, ensuring that all citizens are guaranteed equal protection under the law, regardless of race.
The US Currency Depreciation: What Are the Causes?
You may want to see also

Racial segregation in public schools
The case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. This decision was a major victory for the civil rights movement and paved the way for integration. The case involved the public school system in Topeka, Kansas, which had refused to enrol a black student at the school closest to her home, instead requiring her to travel to a segregated school further away. The Brown family and twelve other black families in similar situations filed a class-action lawsuit against the Topeka Board of Education, challenging its segregation policy as unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court's unanimous ruling stated that ""separate educational facilities are inherently unequal" and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This marked a reversal of the "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which had allowed segregation as long as the facilities for each race were equal. Despite the "separate but equal" principle, black schools often had fewer resources and poorer facilities, and the Court in Brown acknowledged the harmful effects of segregation on black children.
The Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education was carefully worded and did not provide specific directions for ending racial segregation in schools. Nevertheless, it legally ended decades of state-sanctioned segregation in public education, declaring that where a state provides public education, it must be made available to all on equal terms. The ruling set a precedent for addressing new problems within the framework of the Constitution and inspired further civil rights activism.
The case of Brown v. Board of Education was significant in that it brought together five cases from different states, presenting segregation as a national issue. The Court's decision was unanimous, but it faced resistance from segregationists and some constitutional scholars who disagreed with the Court's reliance on social science data. Despite this, the ruling stood as a pivotal moment in American history, signalling the end of legalized racial segregation in public schools and inspiring the civil rights movement of the late 1950s and '60s.
Mayors' Constitutional Oath: What's the Promise?
You may want to see also

The separate but equal doctrine
The "separate but equal" doctrine was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law, according to which racial segregation did not necessarily violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which nominally guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people. The doctrine was confirmed in the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision of 1896, which allowed state-sponsored segregation. The case arose out of an incident in 1892 in which Homer Plessy (seven-eighths white and one-eighth black) purchased a train ticket to travel within Louisiana and took a seat in a car reserved for white passengers. After he refused to move to a car for African Americans, he was arrested and charged with violating Louisiana's Separate Car Act.
The Plessy v. Ferguson decision held that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality. This doctrine came to be known as "separate but equal". The "separate but equal" doctrine applied in theory to all public facilities, including schools, medical facilities, theatres, restaurants, restrooms, and drinking fountains. However, the provision of equal services to non-whites was rarely enforced, and the facilities and social services offered to African Americans were almost always of lower quality than those offered to white Americans, if they existed at all. Most African-American schools had less public funding per student than nearby white schools, and had older textbooks, used equipment, and poorly paid and prepared teachers.
In 1951, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas, in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. The suit, Brown v. Board of Education, argued that the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees equal protection of the laws, and that racial segregation in education deprives Black children of equal status, destroys their self-respect, denies them full opportunity for democratic social development, and stamps them with a badge of inferiority. The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Brown v. Board of Education, delivered in 1954, overturned Plessy v. Ferguson, banning states from allowing segregation in public education. The Court ruled that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal," and therefore laws that impose them violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This decision paved the way for integration and was a major victory for the civil rights movement.
Understanding the Constitution: Its Purpose and Role
You may want to see also
Explore related products

The civil rights movement
The case was brought by the Browns and twelve other local black families in Topeka, Kansas, who filed a class-action lawsuit against the Topeka Board of Education, alleging that its segregation policy was unconstitutional. The case was heard by a special three-judge court of the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, which ruled against the Browns, citing the precedent of Plessy v. Ferguson and its \"separate but equal\" doctrine. The Browns appealed the ruling directly to the Supreme Court, which issued a unanimous 9-0 decision in their favour in May 1954.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. The Court ruled that \"separate educational facilities are inherently unequal\" and therefore laws that impose them violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This decision rejected the "separate but equal" doctrine advanced by the Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, which had held that racial segregation laws did not violate the Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality.
Despite the unanimous decision and carefully chosen wording, there was considerable resistance to the Supreme Court's ruling. In addition to segregationists, some constitutional scholars felt that the decision went against legal tradition by relying heavily on data supplied by social scientists rather than precedent or established law. However, minority groups and members of the civil rights movement were greatly encouraged by the decision, even without specific directions for implementation. They believed that the Supreme Court had appropriately used its position to adapt the Constitution to address new problems.
Understanding Scar Formation and Maturation
You may want to see also

The role of social science research
The case of Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, despite the equality in quality of the segregated schools. This unanimous decision paved the way for integration and was a significant victory for the civil rights movement.
The social science research and data provided by Shagaloff and other social scientists were not without controversy, however. Some constitutional scholars criticised the Supreme Court's heavy reliance on this data, arguing that the decision went against legal tradition by not relying on precedent or established law. They believed that the court had overstepped its constitutional powers by essentially writing new law.
Despite this criticism, the social science research played an undeniable role in shaping the court's opinion and decision. The court's opinion discussed the Fourteenth Amendment, adopted in 1868, and whether it was meant to abolish segregation in public education. The court could not conclude on this question, even after hearing arguments from lawyers on the historical sources and circumstances surrounding the amendment's adoption.
In conclusion, the social science research presented in Brown v. Board of Education provided critical insight into the harms of segregation and shaped the court's decision to rule racial segregation in public schools as unconstitutional. This case set a precedent and served as a catalyst for further advances in civil rights, including the desegregation of housing, public accommodations, and institutions of higher education.
Join the USS Constitution: Requirements and Steps
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
On May 17, 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9-0) that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, violating the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. This marked a reversal of the "separate but equal" doctrine from Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
The constitutional question in Brown v. Board of Education was whether the segregation of white and Black children in public schools based solely on race, pursuant to state laws, denied Black children the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark decision that legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. It helped inspire the American civil rights movement of the late 1950s and '60s.










![Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61R-n2y0Q8L._AC_UL320_.jpg)






![Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61qrQ6YZVOL._AC_UL320_.jpg)





![Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/711lR4w+ZNL._AC_UL320_.jpg)

