The National Drinking Age: Constitutional Authority Explained

The constitutional authority for the national drinking age in the United States can be traced back to the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984, which was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan. This act established 21 as the minimum legal purchase age and was aimed at reducing drunk driving fatalities and underage drinking. Prior to the act, the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) varied by state, with some states lowering it to 18, 19, or 20 in response to the change in the voting age. However, studies showed a significant increase in motor vehicle fatalities attributed to the lower MLDA, and advocacy groups urged states to raise the age to 21. The act punished states that allowed persons under 21 to purchase alcohol by reducing their federal highway funding by 10%, later amended to 8% from 2012 onwards. Despite the act, the minimum purchase and drinking ages remain state laws, and some states still allow for “underage” consumption of alcohol in certain circumstances, such as with parental consent or for religious purposes.

Explore related products

National minimum drinking age law

$16.99

Brush with the Law: The True Life Story of Law School Today at Harvard and Stanford

$17.99

Contest for Constitutional Authority: The Abortion and War Powers Debates

$25.88 $29.95

Historical Gloss and Foreign Affairs: Constitutional Authority in Practice

$39.46 $49.95

War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority

$28.99 $31

Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale Law Library Series in Legal History and Reference)

$35 $21.49

The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984

The constitutional authority for the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 stems from the Twenty-first Amendment, which repealed Prohibition in 1933. After Prohibition, nearly all states adopted an MLDA of 21. However, between 1970 and 1975, 29 states lowered the MLDA to 18, 19, or 20, primarily due to the change in the voting age. This led to a significant increase in motor vehicle fatalities attributed to the lowered MLDA. In response, several states voluntarily raised their purchase ages, and advocacy groups urged others to follow suit.

The National Minimum Drinking Age Act was written by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and influenced by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). The Act did not violate the Twenty-first Amendment, which reserves the right to regulate alcohol for responsibilities not specifically delegated to the federal government. The Act controlled the distribution of funds, providing a strong incentive for states to comply. By mid-1988, all 50 states and the District of Columbia had raised their purchase ages to 21.

The Act has been successful in reducing underage drinking and improving community health. Drinking among high school seniors has decreased substantially since the Act's implementation, and there has been a drop in motor vehicle crashes attributed to the higher MLDA. However, the current purchase age of 21 remains controversial among Americans, as it is higher than the age of majority (18 in most states) and higher than the purchase ages in most other countries. Some states, such as Louisiana, have had legal challenges to the Act, and organisations like the National Youth Rights Association have sought to lower the drinking age back to 18.

The role of Congress

The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 was passed by the United States Congress and later signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on July 17, 1984. The Act did not outlaw the consumption of alcoholic beverages by those under 21; rather, it prohibited their purchase or public possession. The minimum drinking age is a state law, and most states still allow "underage" consumption of alcohol in some circumstances.

Before the Act, the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) varied by state. From 1976 to 1983, several states voluntarily raised their purchase ages to 19, 20, or 21, in part to combat drunk driving fatalities. However, studies showed a significant increase in motor vehicle fatalities attributable to a lower MLDA. In response, many states raised the minimum legal drinking age.

The Act was influenced by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) and required all states to set their minimum purchasing age to 21. States that chose not to comply would have up to 10% of their federal highway funds withheld. The Act did not violate the Twenty-first Amendment, which reserved the right to regulate alcohol for responsibilities not specifically delegated to the federal government.

The Act also did not criminalize alcohol consumption during religious occasions (e.g., communion wines, Kiddush) or when accompanied by a parent, spouse, or legal guardian age 21 or older. It also allowed for medical purposes, private clubs or establishments, and lawful employment in the alcohol industry for those under 21.

The role of President Reagan

The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 was passed by the United States Congress and was later signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on July 17, 1984. The Act established 21 as the minimum legal purchase age across the nation.

President Reagan's role in this was significant. By signing the Act into law, he made it a federal requirement for all states to set their minimum purchasing age for alcohol to 21. This was a notable change, as previously, the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) had varied by state, with some states allowing the purchase and consumption of alcohol at 18 or 19 years of age. Reagan's signature on the Act demonstrated his support for a standardised, higher drinking age across the country.

The Act itself was written by Senator Frank Lautenberg and was influenced by advocacy groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). The primary motivation behind the Act was to reduce drunk driving fatalities, particularly among youth. Studies had shown that as states lowered their MLDAs, youth traffic crashes increased. This led to public attention and advocacy for a standardised, higher drinking age.

The Act did not outlaw the consumption of alcoholic beverages by those under 21; it focused on the purchase and public possession of alcohol. However, some states, such as Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, New Hampshire, and West Virginia, extended the law to include an outright ban on consumption for those under 21. The Act also included exceptions for religious, medical, and employment purposes, as well as for private clubs or establishments.

The enforcement mechanism of the Act was the withholding of federal highway funds from states that did not comply. Any state that chose not to set its minimum purchasing age to 21 would have up to 10% of its federal highway funds withheld. This financial incentive was a strong motivator for states to comply with the Act, and by mid-1988, all 50 states and the District of Columbia had raised their purchase ages to 21.

In conclusion, President Reagan's role in the National Minimum Drinking Age Act was pivotal. By signing the Act into law, he standardised the minimum legal drinking age across the nation, helping to address drunk driving fatalities and youth drinking, and setting a precedent for future policies aimed at reducing the harmful effects of alcohol consumption.

Explore related products

Revolution Blueprint: Not a revolution of violence, but of law, duty, and constitutional authority.

$17.99 $17.99

The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumeration and Federal Power

$42.83 $49.95

Keepers of the Common Good: The People, Opinion, and the Social Foundations of Constitutional Authority

$134.8 $165

The Second Amendment Primer: A Citizen's Guidebook to the History, Sources, and Authorities for the Constitutional Guarantee of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

$12.99 $12.99

The Believer's Authority: What You Didn't Learn in Church

$15.52 $16.99

American Constitutional Law, Volume I: The Structure of Government

$98.8 $130

The impact on state laws

The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 established 21 as the minimum legal drinking age across the United States. This federal legislation had a significant impact on state laws, as it required states to set their minimum drinking age to 21 or face financial penalties.

Prior to the Act, the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) varied across states. Some states had voluntarily raised their drinking age to 19, 20, or 21, while others had a lower MLDA. The Act aimed to standardize the drinking age nationwide and address concerns about drunk driving and underage drinking.

The Act incentivized states to comply by threatening to withhold up to 10% of their federal highway funds if they did not raise their drinking age to 21. This financial incentive was a powerful motivator for states to change their laws. By 1988, all 50 states and the District of Columbia had raised their drinking age to 21, demonstrating the Act's effectiveness in influencing state legislation.

However, it is important to note that the Act did not criminalize alcohol consumption by those under 21. Instead, it focused on the purchase and public possession of alcohol. Additionally, there are exceptions to the law, such as allowing minors to consume alcohol with parental consent or for religious purposes. Some states have also implemented additional exceptions, demonstrating that while the federal legislation set a national standard, states still have some flexibility in how they enforce and interpret the law.

The impact of the National Minimum Drinking Age Act on state laws extended beyond the legal drinking age. It also influenced related policies and initiatives aimed at reducing underage drinking and its associated risks. For example, colleges and universities have implemented programs to control underage drinking on campus, recognizing the potential health and safety risks. The Act also sparked discussions about the effectiveness of different MLDA levels and the role of the federal government in regulating alcohol consumption.

The constitutionality debate

The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984, which established 21 as the minimum legal drinking age, has been the subject of debate regarding its constitutionality. Some argue that the act infringes on states' rights, while others defend it as a legitimate use of the spending power of Congress.

Before the Act, the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) varied across states. Some states had voluntarily raised their drinking age to 19, 20, or 21 to combat drunk driving fatalities. However, the presence of different MLDAs across states led to a phenomenon known as "blood borders," where youths would drive to a neighbouring state with a lower MLDA, drink legally, and then crash on their way home. This highlighted the need for a uniform national drinking age.

The Tenth Amendment reserves the right to regulate alcohol to the states for all responsibilities not specifically delegated to the federal government. As the National Minimum Drinking Age Act only addresses the purchase and public possession of alcohol, leaving private consumption to state discretion, it does not violate the Twenty-first Amendment. Additionally, the act falls within Congress's spending power, as it incentivizes states to comply by withholding a portion of their federal highway funds.

However, critics argue that the act represents a congressional sidestep of the Tenth Amendment. They contend that using funding as a mechanism to enforce a national drinking age amounts to coercion and infringes on states' rights. The act has faced legal challenges, such as in Louisiana, where the state Supreme Court initially declared a purchase age of 21 unconstitutional before reversing its decision due to public backlash.

The constitutionality of the National Minimum Drinking Age Act continues to be a point of contention, with some advocating for a return to allowing states to set their own MLDAs. Nonetheless, studies have shown the positive impacts of a national drinking age, including reduced youth drinking, fewer alcohol-related traffic accidents, and improved health outcomes for young people.

Frequently asked questions