The Constitution: Safeguarding Our Substantive Rights And Freedoms

Substantive due process is a principle in United States constitutional law that allows courts to establish and protect substantive laws and certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if they are not explicitly mentioned elsewhere in the U.S. Constitution. The Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause protects individuals from federal government interference, while the Fourteenth Amendment protects individuals from interference by state actions.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$237.39 $359

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.38 $126.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Substantive due process

The substantive due process doctrine is essential to constitutional jurisprudence. This doctrine ensures that fundamental rights, such as privacy, marriage, and bodily integrity, are safeguarded from unjust laws and government interference. By applying varying levels of scrutiny, the Supreme Court continues to meticulously evaluate the constitutionality of government actions.

Fundamental rights

The Constitution protects numerous freedoms, even if they are not explicitly stated in the text. One of the key ways in which it does this is through substantive due process, which is a principle in United States constitutional law that allows courts to establish and protect substantive laws and certain fundamental rights from government interference. This includes rights that are essential to liberty, such as privacy, marriage, and bodily integrity.

Substantive due process is rooted in the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibit the federal and state governments, respectively, from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". The Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause protects individuals from federal government interference, while the Fourteenth Amendment, adopted as one of the Reconstruction Amendments after the Civil War, protects individuals from interference by state actions.

The Supreme Court has played a crucial role in upholding these liberties, meticulously evaluating the constitutionality of government actions by applying varying levels of scrutiny. Over time, the Supreme Court has expanded the meaning of the due process clause to include both procedural and substantive due process. This expansion of the clause's meaning demonstrates the dynamic nature of constitutional interpretation and the importance of judicial review in safeguarding fundamental rights.

While the Constitution provides a strong framework for protecting individual liberties, it is important to recognise that the interpretation and application of these rights can evolve over time. The Supreme Court's decisions in this area have had a significant impact on shaping the understanding and protection of fundamental rights in the United States. By interpreting the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments broadly, the Court has ensured that a wide range of rights are protected from government interference.

Privacy

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects individual rights through substantive due process. This is essential to constitutional jurisprudence. This doctrine ensures that fundamental rights, such as privacy, are safeguarded from unjust laws and government interference.

The Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause protects individuals from federal government interference. The text states that: "No person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...". The Fourteenth Amendment, in particular, protects individuals from interference by state actions.

The Supreme Court has decided that the Constitution protects numerous other freedoms, even if they are not in the text. Courts have asserted that such protections stem from the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibit the federal and state governments, respectively, from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".

The substantive due process doctrine is rooted in the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. This clause concerns rights that are essential to liberty. The incorporation of this doctrine safeguards certain rights against unjust government interference. By applying varying levels of scrutiny, the Supreme Court continues to meticulously evaluate the constitutionality of government actions.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$269.76 $305

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights (Examples & Explanations Series)

$76.95 $76.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$75.91 $345

Marriage

The U.S. Constitution protects the right to marry. In Zablocki v. Redhail, the Court identified the right to marry as a "fundamental interest" that necessitates "critical examination" of governmental restrictions that "interfere directly and substantially" with the right. The Court's due process decisions have broadly defined a protected liberty interest in marriage and family.

The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution to recognise the existence of several fundamental rights that were not expressly stated, including an individual's right to marry.

In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court was tasked with reviewing the constitution of the Racial Integrity Act in Loving v. Virginia. The Court overturned its previous decision in Pace v. Alabama, holding that Virginia's anti-miscegenation laws violated the Equal Protection Clause. The Court said that "there can be no doubt that restricting the freedom to marry solely because of racial classifications violates the central meaning of the Equal Protection Clause". Following Loving, the Court struck down other laws that seemed to restrict a person's right to marry.

Bodily integrity

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects individual rights through substantive due process. This is essential to constitutional jurisprudence. This doctrine ensures that fundamental rights, such as privacy, marriage, and bodily integrity, are safeguarded from unjust laws and government interference.

The Supreme Court has decided that the Constitution protects numerous other freedoms, even if they are not in the text. The substantive due process doctrine is rooted in the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. This clause states that: "No person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law..."

The Fourteenth Amendment, in particular, protects individuals from interference by state actions. The Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause protects individuals from federal government interference. Courts have asserted that such protections stem from the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibit the federal and state governments, respectively, from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."

Frequently asked questions