Congressional Privileges: Constitutional Powers And Protections

The United States Congress, also known as the federal government's bicameral legislature, consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Constitution grants members of Congress certain privileges, including the right to free speech and debate without fear of legal repercussions. This privilege, outlined in Article I, Section 6, ensures that members are immune from prosecution or questioning regarding statements made during their official duties, allowing for open and democratic discussions. Additionally, Congress has broad powers to lay and collect taxes and determine compensation for its members. These privileges and powers are designed to maintain a balanced and effective legislative body.

Explore related products

Administrative Law in the Political System: Law, Politics, and Regulatory Policy

$42.83 $69.99

Constitutional immunity of members of Congress hearings, Ninety-third Congress, first session, on the legislative role of Congress in gathering and disclosing information

$27.99

A Call to Congress: The Urgent Need for Cyberattack Amendments to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: Journal of Law and Cyber Warfare Volume 7, Issue 1

$9.99

Democracy’s Privileged Few: Legislative Privilege and Democratic Norms in the British and American Constitutions

$55.44 $60

The Judgment Fund: History, Administration, and Common Usage

$0.99

A Treatise Upon the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament

$8.95 $23.95

Members of Congress cannot be arrested for anything except treason, felony or breach of peace

Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 of the US Constitution outlines certain privileges for members of Congress, including freedom from arrest except in cases of treason, felony, or breach of the peace. This privilege from arrest applies when Congress is in session and when members are travelling to and from Congress.

The "privilege from arrest" clause was based on English parliamentary and colonial practices, as well as the precedent established by the Articles of Confederation of 1781. The Articles stated that members of Congress "shall be protected in their persons from arrests and imprisonments" during their attendance and travel to and from Congress, except in cases of treason, felony, or breach of the peace.

The phrase "treason, felony, and breach of the peace" has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to encompass all criminal offences. This interpretation was established in the case of Williamson v. United States in 1908, where the Court held that the phrase was commonly used and well-understood in English parliamentary privilege before the American Revolution. As a result, the privilege from arrest only applies to civil cases, and members of Congress can be arrested and prosecuted for criminal offences.

The privilege from arrest was justified by Justice Joseph Story, who argued that it reflected the superior duties of members of legislative bodies to the legislative process and the representation of their constituents. He stated that when a member of Congress is summoned for an arrest, the people they represent lose their voice in debate and vote.

While the "privilege from arrest" clause in the Constitution provides some protection for members of Congress, it is important to note that it does not grant them immunity from criminal prosecution. The clause only applies to civil suit arrests, which were common when the Constitution was ratified.

Congress members are compensated according to pay-rate legislation passed by Congress

Article I, Section 6 of the US Constitution outlines the rights and limitations of members of Congress. Clause 1 of this section covers Congressional pay, privileges, and immunities. According to this clause, members of Congress:

> Shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States.

This means that the federal government will compensate Senate and House members according to pay-rate legislation passed by Congress. In other words, Congress decides how much its members are paid. From the founding of the US until 1967, Congress directly set specific rates of pay for its members.

Since 1967, a quadrennial commission has been responsible for proposing salary levels for top government officials, including members of Congress. This commission system was challenged by some members of Congress as violating the mandate that compensation be “ascertained by Law”. However, these challenges were rejected.

In 1975, Congress legislated to bring members of Congress within a separate commission system, allowing the President to recommend annual increases for civil servants to maintain pay comparability with private-sector employees. This was followed by the Ethics Reform Act of 1989, which altered the pay-increase and cost-of-living-increase provisions of the law.

There have been arguments for and against increasing the salaries of members of Congress. Proponents of a salary raise argue that it would make the position more accessible to people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and reduce the effectiveness of bribes from lobbyists and PACS. On the other hand, some members of Congress have dissented against the use of commissions to set congressional compensation, and there have been concerns about state frugality in compensating members of Congress, which could reduce the pool of candidates.

Congress members are immune from prosecution for statements made during Congressional duties

Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 of the US Constitution outlines the rights and limitations of members of Congress, including their privileges and immunities. This clause includes the "Speech or Debate Clause", which states that members of Congress "shall not be questioned in any other place" for "any Speech or Debate" given in either House.

The Speech or Debate Clause grants members of Congress immunity from prosecution for statements made during Congressional duties. This means that Congress members cannot be sued or prosecuted for their legislative activities, including speeches, debates, and other statements made in the course of their official duties. This protection is intended to ensure the independence of legislators and safeguard the integrity of the legislative process.

The scope of this immunity has been clarified and affirmed by the Supreme Court in cases such as Gravel v. United States (1972) and U.S. v. Brewster (1972). In Gravel v. United States, the Court held that the privileges of the Speech or Debate Clause extend not only to members of Congress but also to their aides, provided that the aides are performing services that would be immune legislative conduct if performed by the legislator themselves. The Court also emphasised that this privilege is absolute, and if testimony is deemed privileged, then it is fully protected.

In U.S. v. Brewster, the Supreme Court clarified the purpose of the Speech or Debate Clause, stating that it is "not written into the Constitution simply for the personal or private benefit of members of Congress, but to protect the integrity of the legislative process by insuring the independence of individual legislators." This case affirmed that the clause provides immunity for legislative activities, including statements made during Congressional duties.

The application of the Speech or Debate Clause has been a subject of debate in several notable cases. For example, in 2006, an FBI raid on the office of Representative William J. Jefferson during an investigation into his business ventures in Africa prompted objections from congressional leaders who argued that the raid violated the Speech or Debate Clause. In another case, a lawsuit was filed against Congressman Murtha over allegedly defamatory comments made about the Haditha killings, with some arguing that Murtha was acting as a lawmaker and thus protected by the Speech or Debate Clause. These cases highlight the ongoing discussion and interpretation of the scope and applicability of the Speech or Debate Clause in granting immunity to members of Congress for their official statements.

Explore related products

State of New York, in Assembly, Breach of Privilege: Independence of the Judiciary and Limitation of Legislative Power; Argument Approved by the ... and Members of the Bar (Classic Reprint)

$19.57

The Politics of Executive Privilege

$42

Franking privilege for members of Congress: Public Law 93-191 (effective December 18, 1973) a compilation of legislative history, Ninety-third Congress, first session

$14.99

New South Wales Legislative Assembly Practice, Procedure and Privilege

$173.67

Parliamentary Privilege in Canada: Second Edition (Volume 2)

$110

The Legislative Authority of the British Parliament, With Respect to North America, and the Privileges of the Assemblies There, Briefly Considered. By J. M. of the Inner-Temple

$19.95

Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes for the country's welfare

The US Constitution grants members of Congress certain privileges and immunities. Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 covers Congressional pay, privileges, and immunities. For instance, it outlines that senators and representatives will be compensated for their services, with their pay being ascertained by law and paid out of the US Treasury. Clause 2 restricts members of Congress from holding other federal offices while they serve in the legislature.

Article I, Section 6 also includes the "Speech or Debate Clause", which states that members of Congress cannot be questioned in any court for their speeches or debates in either House. This protection ensures that legislators can speak freely and perform their duties without fear of legal repercussions, fostering transparency and democratic participation.

One of the key privileges granted to Congress by the Constitution is the power to lay and collect taxes for the country's general welfare. This power is outlined in Article I, Section 8, which states that Congress has broad authority to "lay and collect taxes". However, there are some limitations to this power. Congress may not establish capitation or direct taxes unless they are subject to apportionment. Capitation taxes are those paid by every person, regardless of their property, profession, or any other circumstances. Direct taxes refer to real and personal property taxes.

The Constitution also grants Congress the power to impose taxes or duties on the importation of persons, with some restrictions. For example, the Migration or Importation Clause in Article I states that Congress may not prohibit the migration or importation of persons before the year 1808, but it may impose a tax or duty on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars per person.

In summary, the Constitution grants members of Congress various privileges, including protection from arrest during their attendance at Congressional sessions and the freedom to speak and debate without legal repercussions. One of Congress's most significant powers is the ability to lay and collect taxes for the country's welfare, with certain limitations on direct and capitation taxes.

Congress members cannot hold other federal offices while serving in the legislature

Article I, Section 6 of the US Constitution outlines the rights and limitations of members of Congress. Clause 2 of this section explicitly prohibits members of Congress from simultaneously holding other federal offices while serving in the legislature. This restriction is in place to maintain the integrity of the legislative process and ensure that Congress members are solely dedicated to their legislative duties.

The US Congress, established by Article I of the Constitution, is the legislative branch of the federal government. It consists of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives, often referred to as the "House." Each state elects two senators for staggered six-year terms, regardless of population, resulting in 100 senators in total. On the other hand, the House of Representatives is made up of 435 members, with each state having a number of representatives proportional to its population.

The Senate and the House of Representatives share the responsibility of creating federal statutory law. They have distinct powers and duties, with the House having exclusive powers such as initiating revenue bills, impeaching federal officials, and electing the President in the case of an electoral college tie. The Senate, meanwhile, confirms presidential appointments, ratifies treaties, and has the Vice President of the United States as its President, who can cast a tie-breaking vote.

Congress holds significant legislative authority, including the power to enact legislation, declare war, and confirm or reject Presidential appointments. It also has broad powers to levy taxes and tariffs to fund essential government services and establish an annual budget. Additionally, Congress can authorize borrowing if sufficient funds cannot be raised through taxation. Both chambers possess substantial investigative powers, enabling them to compel the production of evidence or testimony as deemed necessary.

By prohibiting members of Congress from holding other federal offices, the Constitution ensures that Congress members can dedicate their full attention to their legislative duties and responsibilities. This separation of roles helps maintain the independence and integrity of the legislative branch, one of the key considerations of the Framers when drafting the Constitution.

Frequently asked questions