Constitutionalism In Action: A Real-World Example

Constitutionalism is a normative political theory that contends that all exercises of governmental power are subject to important substantive limitations. It is a mechanism that provides legitimacy to a democratic government. It is the position or practice that a government be limited by a constitution, usually written. One of the most salient features of constitutionalism is that it describes and prescribes both the source and the limits of government power derived from fundamental law. An example of constitutionalism in action is the Indian Constitution, which has developed a robust mechanism to put in place administrative mechanisms for the smooth functioning of the machinery of governance.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$237.95 $359

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.38 $126.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Separation of powers

The principle of separation of powers is integral to constitutional governance in Western democracies. It involves dividing the government's three basic functions—legislative, executive, and judicial—among three independent branches. This prevents the concentration of power in a single entity, which could lead to arbitrary and oppressive government action.

The legislative power is vested in Congress, the executive power in the President, and the judicial power in the Supreme Court and lower courts created by Congress. Each branch has checks to resist encroachments by the other branches. For example, Congress cannot veto the President's removal of an executive officer, and the President cannot usurp Congress's lawmaking powers through executive orders.

The separation of powers doctrine emerged during the English Civil War in the 17th century, influenced by European intellectuals like John Locke and the Baron de Montesquieu. It was further developed in the 18th century by the founders of the American republic and later adopted in Britain, France, and the United States. The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 states, "Any society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured, nor the separation of powers determined, has no constitution."

The separation of powers aims to prevent domination by any individual or group and promote political equality. It fosters collaboration between branches, with each branch having independence and sharing power through interdependence. This republican separation of powers views representative institutions as having the authority to determine the separation of powers by statute, upholding a constitutional order grounded in deliberation, compromise, and statecraft.

However, modern separation-of-powers law is often premised on a misunderstanding, with judges and lawyers assuming judicially enforceable limits on one branch's power to interfere with others. This juristocratic separation of powers has been criticised for undermining the legal legitimacy of the Court and the democratic legitimacy of the political branches.

Judicial control

Constitutionalism is a normative political theory that asserts that all exercises of governmental power are subject to limitations. It is an amalgamation of underlying principles, including the separation of powers, judicial control, and accountable government. The separation of powers divides the mechanism of governance into three branches: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. This division not only prevents the monopolisation of power but also creates a system of checks and balances.

The judiciary plays a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing constitutional provisions, ensuring that governmental actions do not exceed their constitutionally mandated boundaries. This interpretation and enforcement of constitutional limits may be left to legislative bodies in some jurisdictions, such as New Zealand, where courts are forbidden from striking down legislation on constitutional grounds.

In the United States, the case of Marbury v. Madison affirmed the practical necessity of judicial review, a principle followed by most nations. Judicial control serves to protect individual rights and freedoms, ensuring that governmental actions do not infringe upon them. It also addresses the concern that even a majority of the people can oppress others without violating their own rights.

Constitutionalism, through judicial control, seeks to prevent arbitrary government and the domination of the ruled by their rulers. It establishes a condition of political equality, characterised by a balance of power between all relevant groups and parties within a polity. This balance ensures that no single group can rule without consulting the interests of the others, fostering a system of checks and balances.

Rule of law

The rule of law is a central tenet of constitutionalism. It refers to a political situation where all people and institutions within a political body are subject to the same laws. This is often expressed as "no one is above the law" or "all are equal before the law".

The rule of law is distinct from the "rule of man", where one person or group rules arbitrarily. The rule of law is intended to prevent the arbitrary use of power and to ensure a non-arbitrary form of government. It is the foundation for communities of justice, opportunity, peace, accountable government, and respect for fundamental rights.

In a constitutional, rule-of-law regime, pre-existing rules provide the necessary foundations for all government actions. For example, a police officer can only arrest a person for burglary if the legislature has made burglary a crime. These pre-existing rules also govern how government offices are staffed, the procedures government officials must follow when making laws, and the laws they are permitted to make.

The rule of law is not a new concept. Its development can be traced through history to many ancient civilizations, including ancient Greece, Mesopotamia, India, and Rome. The earliest conception of the rule of law can be found in the Indian epics Ramayana and Mahabharata, which date to around the 8th or 9th centuries BC. The Mahabharata deals with the concepts of Dharma (law and duty), Rajdharma (the duty of the king), and Dharmaraja.

In 1215, Archbishop Stephen Langton and the Barons of England restricted the powers of King John and future sovereigns and magistrates under the rule of law, preserving ancient liberties through the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta's influence waned over the centuries, but it is widely considered to have influenced the United States Constitution.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$297.73

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights (Examples & Explanations Series)

$76.95 $76.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$75.91 $345

Individual rights and freedoms

Constitutionalism is a doctrine that asserts that a government's authority is determined by a body of laws or a constitution. It is a normative political theory that contends that all exercises of governmental power are subject to important substantive limitations. In other words, there are some things that the government cannot do, regardless of how closely it adheres to established procedures or how well it reflects informed and deliberate public opinion.

Constitutionalism is concerned with the principles of constitutional design, which includes the principle that the field of public action be partitioned between delegated powers to the government and the rights of individuals, each of which is a restriction of the other. It is based on the idea that government can and should be legally limited in its powers and that its authority depends on observing these limitations. This view emphasizes the specification and judicial protection of the different competences of the political system and of constitutionally entrenched rights by a constitutional court.

The classical republican tradition, as interpreted by neorepublican scholars, identifies arbitrariness with the domination of the ruled by their rulers. It seeks to prevent this domination by establishing a condition of political equality characterized by a balance of power between all relevant groups and parties within a polity. This ensures that no one can rule without consulting the interests of the ruled, and that social interests are harmonized to maintain the stability of the polity.

The modern, liberal tradition identifies arbitrariness with interference with individual rights and seeks to establish protections for them through the separation of powers and a judicially protected constitution. This tradition is concerned with the design and functioning of the democratic process, including the selection of electoral systems and the choice between presidential or parliamentary forms of government.

In conclusion, constitutionalism is about limiting the power of the government and protecting the rights and freedoms of individuals. It seeks to prevent the domination of the ruled by their rulers and to protect individual rights through the separation of powers and judicial protection. Both the classical republican and modern, liberal traditions are present within most democracies and play a crucial role in shaping the political landscape.

Limitations on government power

Constitutionalism is a doctrine that asserts that a government's authority is determined by a body of laws or a constitution. It is a mechanism that provides legitimacy to a democratic government. It is not to be confused with the legality of the acts of officials in a government setup.

Constitutionalism is a normative political theory that contends that all exercises of governmental power, whether representing the will of one person, an elite, or an overwhelming majority of the citizenry, are subject to important substantive limitations. It embodies the idea that governments can and should be legally limited in their powers, and that their authority depends on their observing these limitations.

Constitutionalism attempts to prevent arbitrary government by designing mechanisms that determine who can rule, how, and for what purposes. It is concerned with the principles of constitutional design, which includes the principle that the field of public action be partitioned between delegated powers to the government and the rights of individuals, each of which is a restriction of the other.

Constitutionalism also includes the idea of separation of powers, which divides the mechanism of governance into three branches: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. This not only prevents the monopolization of power but also creates a system of checks and balances.

In conclusion, constitutionalism is a crucial concept that serves to limit government power, protect individual rights and freedoms, and ensure democratic principles are upheld. It provides a framework for legitimate governance and seeks to prevent arbitrary rule by establishing a system of checks and balances.

Frequently asked questions