Anti-Federalists: Opposing The Constitution's Ratification

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in Congress and the unitary president, threatening to resemble a monarchy. The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures, arguing for the necessity of a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties. Their efforts were influential, leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the nine other amendments constituting the Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

Chen Jiongming and the Federalist Movement: Regional Leadership and Nation Building in Early Republican China (Volume 86) (Michigan Monographs In Chinese Studies)

$60

Revolutionary Brotherhood: Freemasonry and the Transformation of the American Social Order, 1730-1840 (Published by the Omohundro Institute of Early American ... and the University of North Carolina Press)

$16.19 $29.99

Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia [2 volumes]

$201

Allegiance to Liberty: The Changing Face of Patriots, Militias, and Political Violence in America

$53 $58.5

For the People: American Populist Movements from the Revolution to the 1850s

$25.99 $24.95

The Anti-Federalists

When the Constitution was sent to the states for ratification, supporters of the document called themselves Federalists. The Federalists dubbed those who opposed ratification as Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. In Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, Anti-Federalists made ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights. James Madison, a Federalist, eventually agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach, which became the Bill of Rights.

The Federalist Papers

The Anti-Federalists argued that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, at the expense of the states. They believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch and that this resemblance would eventually produce courts of intrigue in the nation’s capital. They also believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one. Furthermore, they believed that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous.

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists eventually reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution. However, this harmony did not extend to the presidency of George Washington, with political divisions within the cabinet of the newly created government emerging in 1792 over fiscal policy.

State legislatures

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress and the president, at the expense of the states. They also believed that the unitary president resembled a monarch, and that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. In Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, three crucial states, Anti-Federalists made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. They argued that the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights, and that without one, the federal government would become tyrannous. They believed that the wealthy aristocrats would run the new national government, and that the elite would not represent ordinary citizens.

The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties. In terms of foreign affairs, they were pro-French.

The Anti-Federalists published a series of articles and delivered numerous speeches against ratification of the Constitution. These writings and speeches have come to be known collectively as The Anti-Federalist Papers. Although they were unsuccessful in preventing the adoption of the Constitution, their efforts were not in vain. The influence of the Anti-Federalists helped lead to the enactment of the Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Great Courses: The Great Debate: Advocates and Opponents of the American Constitution

$21.9

The Anti-Federalist, Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$82.68

The Constitution Decoded: A Guide to the Document That Shapes Our Nation

$12.81 $16.99

The Great Debate: Advocates and Opponents of the American Constitution

$13.09 $43.24

The Great Courses Philosophy and Intellectual History ,The Great Debate: Advocates and Opponents of the American Constitution (DVD and Book 2007 )

$25.25

Individual liberties

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in Congress and the office of the president, resembling a monarchy. They believed that individual liberties were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one.

The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. In national politics, they favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. Anti-Federalists in Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, three crucial states, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on a Bill of Rights. They believed that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous.

The Anti-Federalists published a series of articles and delivered numerous speeches against ratification of the Constitution. These writings and speeches have come to be known collectively as The Anti-Federalist Papers. Although Patrick Henry, Melancton Smith, and others eventually came out publicly against ratification, their efforts were ultimately unsuccessful in preventing the adoption of the Constitution. However, their influence helped lead to the enactment of the Bill of Rights, which includes the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process under the law, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments.

The Bill of Rights

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, they believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in Congress and the office of the president, resembling a monarchy. They argued that the liberties of the people were best protected by strong state governments and weak central government, and that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country, making ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights. Their efforts were influential in producing the Bill of Rights, a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens. These include the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process under the law, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments.

The original draft of the Constitution did not include a Bill of Rights, and James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, initially argued against having one, fearing that they would limit the people’s rights. However, sensing that Anti-Federalist sentiment would sink ratification efforts, Madison eventually introduced draft proposals of what would become the first ten amendments, including the Tenth Amendment, which reinforced the reservation of powers to the states or the people.

The Anti-Federalists thus played a significant role in shaping the Bill of Rights, ensuring that the new federal government could not encroach on the basic rights and freedoms of American citizens. Their opposition to the ratification of the Constitution and their advocacy for a Bill of Rights demonstrate their commitment to protecting individual liberties and limiting the power of the federal government.

Frequently asked questions