Materials Behind The Constitutional Court's Construction

South Africa's Constitutional Court is a deeply symbolic site, with architecture and art that reflect the values of the country's new constitutional democracy. The building is noted for its transparency and graceful proportions, with principal materials including timber, concrete, steel, glass, and black slate, chosen to infuse the court with an African feel. The court's design is based on the concept of justice under a tree, with a fragmented structure of linked pavilions and public plazas. The site's history is also significant, with the court built on the former Old Fort prison complex, a place once affiliated with the violation of human rights.

Explore related products

Court and Garden: From the French Hotel to the City of Modern Architecture

$45

Puzzles for Adults 1000 Pieces Jigsaw Steps Stairs Supreme Court Marble Building Entrance Architecture Clearance Big Large Difficult Cool Hard

$22.89

Law Courts and Courtrooms 1: The Buildings of the Criminal Law: Introductions to Heritage Assets (Historic England Guidance)

$22.26 $49.99

Foundations of Justice: Alberta's Historic Courthouses

$39.95

Puzzles for Adults 1000 Pieces Jigsaw Steps Stairs Supreme Court Marble Building Entrance Architecture Clearance Big Large Difficult Cool Hard

$22.89

Puzzles for Adults 500 Pieces Jigsaw Steps Stairs Supreme Court Marble Building Entrance Architecture Clearance Big Large Difficult Cool Hard

$17.89

Timber, concrete, steel, glass and slate

Timber, concrete, steel, glass, and slate are common materials used in construction. While I cannot confirm that these exact materials were used in the construction of the Constitutional Court, I can provide you with some information on the construction of the court in Johannesburg, South Africa.

The Constitutional Court in Johannesburg was established in 1994 and spent its first few years in rented accommodation. An international architectural competition was held in 1997 to design a new building, with the winning design announced in 1998. The brief for the competition emphasized the importance of the court being rooted in the South African landscape, both physically and culturally, and being dignified yet welcoming and open.

The court is located on Constitution Hill, which was once the site of the Old Fort prison complex, a high-security prison with military capacity. The Old Fort was chosen as the site for the court due to its history, which includes being a center of repression and hope during the racist, authoritarian regime in South Africa. The court's design and location symbolize the transformation of South Africa from this oppressive past to a constitutional democracy.

The building has two layers: the outer layer includes the foyer, court chamber, auditorium, and exhibition space, while the inner layer houses the administration section, judges' conference and meeting rooms, and 14 judges' chambers. The judges' chambers are on three storeys and offer easy access to the court and the library. The foyer opens onto Constitution Square, an open-air hub, and the court chamber is constructed on the site of the former awaiting-trial block, with its bricks being reused in the walls of the chamber.

Bricks from the awaiting-trial block

The Constitutional Court in Johannesburg, South Africa, is a structure with a unique history. The site was carefully chosen to be the Old Fort prison complex, a place that was once a centre of repression, but one that would be transformed into a symbol of constitutional democracy.

The court building itself is constructed from bricks with a story of their own. When the court was built, the awaiting-trial block, constructed in 1928, was demolished with painstaking care, almost brick by brick. These bricks were then used to construct several features of the new court building.

The bricks from the awaiting-trial block were used to build a wall in the Constitutional Court foyer, a wall in the chamber directly behind the judges' chairs, and the Great African Steps, which lie between the court and Number Four. The use of these bricks in the new court building served as a commemoration of the important history of the site.

The process of carefully deconstructing the old building and incorporating its bricks into the new structure symbolises the transformation of South Africa from a racist, authoritarian society to a constitutional democracy. This act of repurposing the bricks from the awaiting-trial block represents the country's ability to convert the negative energy of its past into a positive and hopeful future.

The Constitutional Court, as South Africa's first major post-apartheid government building, was designed to embody the values of openness and transparency. The inclusive process of its creation resulted in a public building like no other, reflecting the country's diverse landscape and culture.

Justice under a tree concept

The concept of "Justice under a tree" is a unique and powerful idea that draws on a rich historical and cultural heritage. This concept of delivering justice in an open, natural setting has deep roots in many traditional societies and offers a compelling alternative to the conventional courtroom.

Under this tree of justice, the idea is to bring a sense of openness and accessibility to the legal process. By holding court sessions outdoors, often in a public space, the proceedings become visible and accessible to all members of the community. This approach aligns with the fundamental principle that justice should be served in full view of the public, fostering a sense of transparency and accountability.

The tree serves as a symbolic and functional centerpiece of this concept. Trees hold cultural and spiritual significance in many societies, often representing wisdom, strength, and resilience. Holding court under a tree establishes a connection to nature and can create a sense of calm and serenity, contributing to a more contemplative and reflective atmosphere for resolving disputes.

Additionally, the "Justice under a tree" concept can help bridge the gap between formal legal systems and traditional dispute resolution practices. In many indigenous and customary legal traditions, community elders or respected figures would gather under a prominent tree to discuss and resolve conflicts. This approach often emphasizes dialogue, consensus-building, and restorative justice, offering a more holistic approach to addressing wrongdoings and repairing harm.

By embracing the "Justice under a tree" concept, the Constitutional Court acknowledges and respects these traditional practices. It creates a space where diverse cultural perspectives can be integrated into the legal process, making justice more inclusive and culturally responsive. This approach can help increase community engagement and trust, particularly in areas where formal legal systems have been historically inaccessible or misunderstood.

Overall, the "Justice under a tree" concept embodies a vision of justice that is open, accessible, and deeply rooted in cultural traditions. It invites community participation, embraces diverse dispute resolution methods, and offers a unique setting that can transform the experience of seeking and delivering justice, fostering a deeper connection between the community and the legal system it serves.

Explore related products

Puzzles for Adults 1000 Pieces Jigsaw Steps Stairs Supreme Court Marble Building Entrance Architecture Clearance Big Large Difficult Cool Hard

$22.89

Puzzles for Adults 500 Pieces Jigsaw Steps Stairs Supreme Court Marble Building Entrance Architecture Clearance Big Large Difficult Cool Hard

$17.89

The Architecture of Constitutional Amendments: History, Law, Politics

$54.85 $60.95

Syria, the Strength of an Idea: The Constitutional Architectures of Its Political Regimes

$34.32 $50

The U.S. Supreme Court's Democratic Spaces (Studies in American Constitutional Heritage Book 5)

$34.95

Constitutional Modernism: Architecture and Civil Society in Cuba, 1933-1959

$35

National Artwork Competitions

The Constitutional Court in Johannesburg, South Africa, is a unique public building with a remarkable history. The site chosen for the court was once a prison complex known as the Old Fort, or Number Four—a place of intense historical significance, having been a site of repression and resistance during the apartheid regime. The prison was closed in 1983, leaving a scar on Johannesburg's landscape. The court's judges deliberately chose this site for its history, intending to transform it from a place of negativity into a symbol of constitutional democracy.

The building process was inclusive, with an international architectural competition held in 1997 to select a design rooted in the South African landscape, physically and culturally. The winning design was chosen by an international panel of judges from 185 formal entries, including 40 from foreign countries. The brief for the competition emphasised the importance of creating a dignified yet welcoming structure, open to the public, and embodying the values of openness and transparency called for by the Constitution.

The construction of the court building involved the demolition of the former prison's awaiting-trial block, with its bricks being reused in the construction of the court's foyer, chamber walls, and the Great African Steps. The bricks from the old prison buildings were also used in the construction of the court, with about 150,000 bricks incorporated into the structure. The new building also preserved four of the central stairwells of the awaiting-trial block, serving as a reminder of South Africa's journey towards democracy and freedom.

The Constitutional Court, inaugurated in 2004, has become a symbol of transformation and a leader in architectural excellence. It stands as a testament to South Africa's creative potential and the regeneration of Johannesburg, converting negative energy into a positive force for the nation's present and future.

To commemorate the significance of the Constitutional Court and its role in South Africa's history, a series of National Artwork Competitions could be organised with themes reflecting on the values of democracy, freedom, and justice. These competitions could invite artists from across the nation to submit their interpretations of these themes, with the winning entries being displayed in a special exhibition within the court's premises or other prominent cultural venues in the country.

The first of these competitions could focus on the theme of "Overcoming Oppression," inviting artists to explore the dark days of South Africa's past and the journey towards breaking free from the chains of apartheid. This could include artistic representations of historical events, personal stories of resilience, or symbolic depictions of the nation's struggle for equality and human rights.

The second competition could be themed "A Celebration of Diversity," encouraging artists to showcase the richness and beauty of South Africa's diverse cultural landscape. This could include artworks celebrating the country's diverse racial, ethnic, and cultural groups, highlighting the unity and harmony that can be achieved through embracing diversity and moving beyond past divisions.

The third competition, titled "Vision for the Future," could invite artists to envision a future South Africa that is inclusive, prosperous, and socially just. This competition could encourage submissions that depict a nation that has healed from its past wounds, with a focus on the role of the Constitution and the court in shaping a brighter future for all its citizens.

The final competition in the series could be a collaborative art project titled "Uniting Our Voices." This could bring together artists from different backgrounds and communities to create artworks that symbolically represent the power of unity and the strength that comes from diverse perspectives coming together. The artworks could be created through cross-community collaborations, with the creative process itself becoming a means of fostering dialogue, understanding, and collective healing.

These National Artwork Competitions would not only showcase the artistic talent within South Africa but also provide a platform for meaningful dialogue and reflection on the nation's past, present, and future. They would contribute to the cultural and artistic landscape of the country, enriching the understanding and appreciation of the values embodied by the Constitutional Court and the journey it represents.

Transparent and welcoming design

The Constitutional Court in Johannesburg, South Africa, is a symbol of the country's transformation from a "racist, authoritarian society" into a constitutional democracy. The building's design reflects the values of openness and transparency, with a focus on welcoming the public and offering a sense of protection and safety to all who enter.

The court is located on the site of the former Old Fort prison complex, a place once associated with repression and colonial oppression. The judges of the Constitutional Court deliberately chose this site because of its history, aiming to convert its negative energy into a positive symbol of hope and transformation. The prison was closed in 1983, and the court was established in 1994, spending its early years in rented accommodation.

The design of the new building was chosen through an international architectural competition in 1997, with a brief emphasising the importance of being rooted in the South African landscape and culture. The winning design, selected by an international panel of judges, was announced in 1998. The construction contract was awarded to Rainbow Construction and WBHO, with Chris Jiyane, one of the few black architects trained during apartheid, as the CEO of Rainbow Construction.

The building has two layers. The outer layer includes the foyer, court chamber, auditorium, and exhibition space, opening onto the Great African Steps. The inner layer consists of administrative sections, judges' conference and meeting rooms, and 14 judges' chambers. The judges' chambers are on three storeys, with open spaces and ponds at ground level, providing easy access to the court and the library. The foyer opens onto Constitution Square, an open-air hub.

The court chamber and Constitution Square are constructed on the site of the former awaiting-trial block, which was demolished to make way for the Court. The architects commemorated this history by retaining four central stairwells and using the bricks from the awaiting-trial block in the walls of the chamber, the foyer, and the Great African Steps. Approximately 150,000 bricks from the old prison buildings were used in the construction of the Court.

Frequently asked questions