Habeas Corpus: The Constitution's Freedom Provision

The writ of habeas corpus is a legal procedure that allows a prisoner or detainee to challenge the validity of their arrest, imprisonment, or detention. Habeas corpus, which first originated in 1215 through the 39th clause of the Magna Carta, is deeply rooted in Anglo-American jurisprudence and is available in various countries with common law systems. In the United States, the Constitution guarantees that the privilege of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it. Despite this guarantee, the writ has been suspended four times in U.S. history, most recently during the Civil War. The suspension of habeas corpus has been a controversial issue, with legal scholars debating its constitutionality and scope. This provision of the Constitution is essential for protecting individuals' rights and ensuring that unlawful detention or imprisonment does not occur.

Explore related products

Habeas Corpus in America: The Politics of Individual Rights (Constitutional Thinking)

$35.51 $59.99

Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus Manual: 28 U.S.C. 2254 Habeas Corpus Practice Manual, Case Law & Forms

$29.99

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus Under the Constitution

$24.95

Habeas Corpus: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

$3.99 $4.79

Winning Habeas Corpus & Post Conviction Relief, 9th Edition 2022

$89.5

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Habeas Corpus in the US Constitution

The writ of habeas corpus is a legal procedure that invokes the jurisdiction of a court to review the unlawful detention or imprisonment of an individual. It is used to bring a prisoner or other detainee before the court to determine if their imprisonment or detention is lawful. The writ of habeas corpus is one of the "extraordinary", "common law", or "prerogative writs", which were historically issued by English courts in the name of the monarch to control inferior courts and public authorities within the kingdom. The writ was a legal mechanism that allowed a court to exercise jurisdiction and guarantee the rights of all the Crown's subjects against arbitrary arrest.

The law of habeas corpus was adopted in the U.S. from English common law. It was first introduced at the 1787 Constitutional Convention with a series of propositions by Charles Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina. Habeas corpus was voted on substantively on August 28, 1787, and the following clause was added to the Constitution: "The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless where in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."

The writ of habeas corpus has been used in the United States to protect citizens from unlawful detention or imprisonment. For example, in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004), the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the right of every American citizen to access habeas corpus, even when declared an enemy combatant. The Court affirmed the basic principle that habeas corpus could not be revoked in the case of a citizen.

The writ of habeas corpus has also been used to challenge the lawfulness of restraint and seek release. In Boumediene v. Bush (2008), the Supreme Court expanded the territorial reach of habeas corpus, ruling that the Suspension Clause guaranteed the right to habeas review. This case involved a challenge by an alien detainee designated as an enemy combatant and held outside the United States, who sought to have their detention reviewed by a federal court. The Court's decision in this case extended the right to habeas corpus to a third category of detainees: noncitizens held outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

Habeas Corpus and the Suspension Clause

The writ of habeas corpus is a legal procedure that invokes the jurisdiction of a court to review the unlawful detention or imprisonment of an individual. It can be used to request the individual's custodian (usually a prison official) to bring the prisoner to court to determine whether their detention is lawful. The writ of habeas corpus is one of the "extraordinary", "common law", or "prerogative writs", historically issued by English courts in the name of the monarch to control inferior courts and public authorities within the kingdom. The writ was a legal mechanism that allowed a court to exercise jurisdiction and guarantee the rights of all the Crown's subjects against arbitrary arrest. Habeas corpus is generally enforced via writ and is referred to as a writ of habeas corpus.

The right of habeas corpus is not a right against unlawful arrest but a right to be released from imprisonment after such an arrest. It is deeply rooted in Anglo-American jurisprudence and was adopted in the U.S. as well. In the British colonies in North America, by the time of the American Revolution, the rights to writs of habeas corpus were regarded as basic protections of individual liberty. The U.S. Constitution guarantees that the privilege “shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it” (Article I, Section 9, paragraph 2).

The Suspension Clause, therefore, protects the writ of habeas corpus as it existed in 1789, i.e., as a writ that federal judges could issue in the exercise of their common-law authority. The Suspension Clause has been invoked to challenge provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) that restrict habeas jurisdiction and limit judicial review of removal orders.

The writ of habeas corpus has been suspended four times since the Constitution was ratified: throughout the entire country during the Civil War; in eleven South Carolina counties overrun by the Ku Klux Klan during Reconstruction; in two provinces of the Philippines during a 1905 insurrection; and in Hawaii after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

Habeas Corpus in other countries' constitutions

The principle of habeas corpus, or the right to challenge unlawful imprisonment, has been a cornerstone of the legal system in the UK, US, and other democratic countries for centuries. The writ of habeas corpus is a Latin term meaning "that you have the body", which allows a prisoner or detainee to appear before a court to determine the validity of their imprisonment or detention. This right is often enshrined in the constitutions of many countries, though it may go by different names.

In the United States, the right to habeas corpus is guaranteed by the Constitution, which states that the privilege "shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it". Despite this, there have been several instances in US history where the writ of habeas corpus has been suspended, including during the Civil War and Reconstruction periods, and in the aftermath of the Pearl Harbor bombing during World War II.

In the United Kingdom, the right to habeas corpus has a long history, dating back to the Magna Carta in 1215. By the time of the American Revolution, the rights to writs of habeas corpus were considered basic protections of individual liberty in the British colonies in North America.

In other countries, the writ of habeas corpus or its equivalent can be found in various forms. In France, safeguards against arbitrary detention are enshrined in the Constitution and regulated by the Penal Code, equivalent to the Habeas Corpus provisions in Germany, the United States, and several Commonwealth countries. In India, the Supreme Court and High Courts have the authority to issue writs of habeas corpus as granted by the Constitution of India. In South Africa, the right to challenge the lawfulness of detention is entrenched in the Bill of Rights, equivalent to the writ of habeas corpus. In Australia, habeas corpus is part of the country's common law inheritance, though there have been concerns about limitations placed on it by the Australian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2005.

Explore related products

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus Under the Constitution, Vol. 2 (Classic Reprint)

$29.97

SMITH'S GUIDE to State Habeas Corpus Relief for State Prisoners

$34.95

The Connecticut Habeas Corpus Guide

$19.99 $19.99

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus Under the Constitution of the United States: In what it Consists. How it is Allowed. How it is Suspended. It ... of an Exercise of Legislative Power

$8.54 $8.95

A Review of Mr. Binney's Pamphlet on "the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus Under the Constitution" (Classic Reprint)

$29.97

Constitution of the State of Illinois: 2025

$14.99

History of Habeas Corpus

The history of habeas corpus can be traced back to the Latin phrase "habeas corpus", which means "produce the body" or "that you have the body". It is a legal mechanism that allows a court to review the legality of a prisoner's detention and prevent the government from holding an individual indefinitely without bringing charges against them.

The concept of habeas corpus first originated in Roman law, predating the Magna Carta of 1215, which is often cited as its foundation. The Magna Carta, signed by King John, guaranteed all free men the right to immunity from illegal imprisonment, stating that "no man shall be arrested or imprisoned...except by the lawful judgment of his peers and by the law of the land."

In the Middle Ages, the writ of habeas corpus evolved in medieval English courts, where a sheriff could be served with the writ, and a court could order the release of a prisoner if they were being held without cause. The Habeas Corpus Act of 1640 further reinforced this right, overturning the notion that the command of the king was a sufficient answer to a petition for habeas corpus.

The modern understanding of habeas corpus as a protection of civil liberty emerged in the 17th century during the struggles between Parliament and the monarchy. The Petition of Right in 1628 charged that the king's jailers were illegally detaining English subjects by ignoring writs of habeas corpus. This led to the passage of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, which imposed strict deadlines for sheriffs and jailers to respond to the writ and applied to privileged jurisdictions.

In the United States, the writ of habeas corpus was specifically referenced in the Constitution, recognising its existence and stipulating the conditions under which it could be suspended. James Madison, in 1789, advocated for the inclusion of habeas corpus in the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court has affirmed the importance of habeas corpus as a safeguard against arbitrary state action, and Congress has expanded its application over time, including through the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). However, there have also been instances where the writ has been suspended, such as during the Civil War and in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.

Habeas Corpus in modern times

Habeas corpus is a legal procedure that invokes the jurisdiction of a court to review the unlawful detention or imprisonment of an individual. It is generally enforced via a writ, and accordingly referred to as a writ of habeas corpus. The writ of habeas corpus is one of the "extraordinary", "common law", or "prerogative writs", which were historically issued by the English courts in the name of the monarch to control inferior courts and public authorities within the kingdom. The writ allows a court to exercise jurisdiction and guarantee the rights of all the Crown's subjects against arbitrary arrest and detention.

The right of habeas corpus is not a right against unlawful arrest but a right to be released from imprisonment after such an arrest. It is a protection of civil liberty, allowing a person who has been detained the chance to challenge that detention in court. This, for example, prevents the government from holding an individual indefinitely without bringing charges against them.

In modern times, habeas corpus has been used in immigration or deportation cases, matters concerning military detentions, court proceedings before military commissions, and convictions in military court. In the United States, the writ of habeas corpus has been used to challenge the legality of detention at Guantanamo Bay. In 2001, a Presidential Military Order purported to give the President of the United States the power to detain non-citizens suspected of connection to terrorists or terrorism as enemy combatants, without charges, a court hearing, or legal counsel. This was contested by legal and constitutional scholars who cited habeas corpus and the United States Bill of Rights. In 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court re-confirmed the right of every American citizen to access habeas corpus even when declared an enemy combatant.

In 2005, the Detainee Treatment Act and the Military Commissions Act of 2006 further narrowed the scope of habeas relief, providing that prisoners held in Guantanamo Bay may not access federal courts through habeas corpus. Instead, they must go through the military commissions and then seek appeal in the D.C. Circuit Court. However, in 2008, the Supreme Court in Boumediene v. Bush expanded the territorial reach of habeas corpus, ruling that the Suspension Clause guaranteed the right to habeas review. Thus, alien detainees designated as enemy combatants who were held outside the United States had the constitutional right to habeas corpus.

Habeas corpus is also enshrined in the constitutions of several other countries. For example, in Portugal, Article 31 of the Constitution guarantees citizens against improper arrest, imprisonment, or detention. Similarly, in Malaysia, the federal constitution guarantees the remedy of habeas corpus, although not by name. Article 5(2) of the Constitution of Malaysia provides that "Where complaint is made to a High Court or any judge thereof that a person is being unlawfully detained the court shall inquire into the complaint and, unless satisfied that the detention is lawful, shall order him to be produced before the court and release him". In the Philippines, habeas corpus is guaranteed in terms almost identical to those used in the U.S. Constitution.

Frequently asked questions