Slavery's Concessions: The Constitution's Dark Legacy

The US Constitution was ratified in 1787, and while it did not contain the word slavery, it included several concessions to the slaveholding South. The Three-Fifths Compromise, for example, gave Southern states extra representation in Congress and votes in the Electoral College. The Constitution also prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for 20 years, and included a fugitive slave clause requiring the return of runaway slaves to their owners. These concessions were the price for the support of Southern delegates for a strong central government. The Constitution's complexity allowed it to be used to protect and promote slavery, as well as to forge compromises.

Explore related products

Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

$17.1 $19.99

A Slaveholders' Union: Slavery, Politics, and the Constitution in the Early American Republic

$32 $31.99

A Fire Bell in the Past: The Missouri Crisis at 200, Volume I, Western Slavery, National Impasse (Studies in Constitutional Democracy Book 1)

$42.75 $45

A Union Indivisible: Secession and the Politics of Slavery in the Border South (Civil War America)

$19.99 $39.95

A Fire Bell in the Past: The Missouri Crisis at 200, Volume II: “The Missouri Question” and Its Answers (Volume 2) (Studies in Constitutional Democracy)

$45 $45

The Counterrevolution of Slavery: Politics and Ideology in Antebellum South Carolina

$39.66 $42.5

The Three-Fifths Compromise gave extra representation to slave states

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a concession to slavery included in the US Constitution. This agreement, made between delegates from the Northern and Southern states at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, dictated that three-fifths of the enslaved population would be considered when determining representation in the House of Representatives and direct taxation. In other words, for every five enslaved people in a state, three would be counted as part of the state's total population for the purpose of determining the number of representatives that state could send to Congress. This gave Southern states with large enslaved populations extra representation in Congress, creating what became known as the "Slave Power" in the legislature.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a result of the delegates' differing views on slavery and the apportionment of legislative representation. While some delegates owned slaves and had moral qualms about slavery, others were outspoken advocates for abolition. The Southern delegates threatened to abandon the convention if enslaved individuals were not counted at all, while the Northern delegates were unwilling to grant this request. As a compromise, the framers agreed to count three-fifths of a state's enslaved population for representation and taxation purposes.

The Three-Fifths Compromise had significant implications for the political power dynamics between the Northern and Southern states. The additional seats in Congress gained by the Southern states due to the Compromise made it easier for bills favourable to the Southern region to pass. This led to frustration over regional political power imbalances, which resulted in future compromises such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was just one of several concessions to slavery included in the US Constitution. The Constitution also prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for 20 years and included a fugitive slave clause that required the return of runaway slaves to their owners. Additionally, it gave the federal government the power to put down domestic rebellions, including slave insurrections. These concessions were made to maintain the unity of the new nation and gain the support of Southern delegates for a strong central government.

The Constitution prohibited Congress from outlawing the slave trade for 20 years

The Constitution of the United States was drafted in 1787 and included several concessions to slavery. One of the most significant was the prohibition on Congress outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for 20 years. This concession was made to secure the support of southern delegates, particularly from Georgia and South Carolina, who threatened to withdraw from the Union if their demands were not met.

The Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted three-fifths of a state's slave population for representation purposes, gave southern states extra representation in Congress and the Electoral College. This compromise, along with the prohibition on outlawing the slave trade, were seen as critical to maintaining the unity of the newly formed United States. The framers of the Constitution believed that these concessions were necessary to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government.

The issue of slavery was a highly contentious topic during the Constitutional Convention. Many of the delegates, including some slave owners, had moral qualms about slavery and recognised that it contradicted the ideals of liberty and equality. However, they also understood that any attempt to abolish slavery would be strongly opposed by the powerful slave-holding class in the South. As a result, they chose to sidestep the issue, leaving it to the individual states to decide, which would have consequences in the future.

The Constitution also included a Fugitive Slave Clause, which required the return of runaway slaves to their owners, and gave the federal government the power to put down slave rebellions. These provisions further protected the institution of slavery and the rights of slave owners. While some criticised the Constitution for its concessions to slavery, others, like Frederick Douglass, argued that it laid the groundwork for future abolition.

In conclusion, the prohibition on Congress outlawing the slave trade for 20 years was a significant concession made in the Constitution to appease slave-holding states and maintain national unity. This concession, along with others, shaped the complex relationship between slavery and the United States government, leading to political struggles and, ultimately, the Civil War.

The Fugitive Slave Clause required the return of runaway slaves

The Fugitive Slave Clause, also known as Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3, was a provision in the US Constitution that required runaway slaves to be returned to their enslavers. This clause was agreed upon without dissent at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 and was designed to balance the competing interests of free and slave states. The Fugitive Slave Clause was first enforced through the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793, which clarified the processes by which enslavers could reclaim their "property".

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was a federal law that aimed to enforce the Fugitive Slave Clause by establishing procedures for the capture and return of runaway slaves. This Act contributed to the growing polarization of the country over slavery, as it required officials and citizens of free states to cooperate in returning escaped slaves to their enslavers. The Act was one of the factors that led to the founding of the Republican Party and the eventual outbreak of the American Civil War.

The Fugitive Slave Clause and the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 set a precedent for the legal right of enslavers to reclaim their "property" from other states and jurisdictions. This right was further enforced through the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which established harsh penalties for anyone who assisted runaway slaves or hindered their recapture. The Act also authorized federal commissioners to issue warrants for the arrest of fugitive slaves and empowered federal marshals to enforce those warrants in free states.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 faced significant opposition and resistance, with abolitionists working to defend fugitive slaves in trials and pay for their freedom. In 1855, the Wisconsin Supreme Court declared the Act unconstitutional, marking a pivotal moment in the growing resistance to slavery. However, it was only in 1864, during the Civil War, that the Fugitive Slave Act was formally repealed.

The Fugitive Slave Clause and the subsequent Fugitive Slave Acts reflected the complex political landscape surrounding slavery in the United States. While some delegates at the Constitutional Convention expressed moral objections to slavery, the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause demonstrates the concessions made to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government. The enforcement of these laws also highlights the ongoing struggle between free and slave states, which ultimately contributed to the polarization of the country and the outbreak of the Civil War.

Explore related products

A Hell of a Storm: The Battle for Kansas, the End of Compromise, and the Coming of the Civil War

$17.65 $32

Murder on the Mississippi: The Shocking Crimes That Shaped Abraham Lincoln

$29.99 $14.95

No Compromise with Slavery: An Address Delivered to the Broadway Tabernacle, New York

$1.99 $9.99

Contesting the Constitution: Congress Debates the Missouri Crisis, 1819-1821 (Studies in Constitutional Democracy)

$43 $43

Apostle of Union: A Political Biography of Edward Everett (Civil War America)

$9.99 $19.99

To Save Us All from Slavery's Power: Republican Alarms, Southern Terrors, and the Plunge into Civil War (A Nation Divided)

$32.5 $120

The federal government was empowered to put down slave rebellions

The Constitution of the United States included several concessions to slavery, including the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted three-fifths of a state's slave population when apportioning representation, thereby giving the South extra representation in the House of Representatives and extra votes in the Electoral College. The Constitution also prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for twenty years and included a fugitive slave clause that required the return of runaway slaves to their owners.

One of the key concessions to slavery in the Constitution was the empowerment of the federal government to put down slave rebellions. This was known as the Slave Insurrection Clause in Article I, Section 8. The framers of the Constitution believed that this concession was necessary to address the fear of slave uprisings among white people in slave-holding states, which increased in the early 19th century. The inclusion of this clause in the Constitution gave the federal government the authority to send troops to suppress slave insurrections and prevent enslaved people from seeking freedom through violent means.

The debate over the inclusion of the Slave Insurrection Clause in the Constitution reflected the complex nature of the slavery debate in the United States. On the one hand, some delegates, such as Luther Martin of Maryland, argued that the federal government should have a role in regulating the slave trade and suppressing slave revolts. He believed that slavery was inconsistent with America's republican ideals and the principles of the Revolution. However, delegates from southern states, such as John Rutledge of South Carolina, strongly opposed federal interference in the slave trade, threatening to secede from the Union if it was regulated by the federal government.

The compromise reached in the Constitution reflected the desire to maintain unity and avoid secession. By empowering the federal government to put down slave rebellions, the framers of the Constitution believed they were addressing the concerns of southern states while also recognising that slavery was a moral and ethical issue. However, this concession also meant that the federal government had a role in maintaining slavery and preventing enslaved people from taking violent action to seek their freedom.

Overall, the inclusion of the Slave Insurrection Clause in the Constitution was a significant concession to slavery, reflecting the complex political and social landscape of the time and the ongoing struggle between the ideals of liberty and the reality of slavery in the United States.

Slaveholders were the most powerful class in the US

The concessions to slavery in the US Constitution highlight the power of slaveholders in the country at the time. The Constitution included several provisions that protected the institution of slavery and granted power to slaveholders. One of the most notable concessions was the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted three-fifths of a state's slave population when apportioning representation. This gave Southern states with large slave populations greater representation in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College, thus increasing their political power.

The Constitution also included a fugitive slave clause, which required the return of runaway slaves to their owners, and it prohibited Congress from outlawing the Atlantic slave trade for 20 years. Additionally, it gave the federal government the power to put down domestic rebellions, including slave insurrections, which was a significant concern for slaveholders.

The framers of the Constitution, many of whom were slaveholders themselves, recognized the moral dilemma of slavery but ultimately chose to sidestep the issue to maintain unity between the Northern and Southern states. This decision laid the foundation for future conflicts, as the power of slaveholders continued to grow. The term "Slave Power" or "Slavocracy" referred to the political power held by slaveholders in the federal government during the Antebellum period. This power was perceived as a threat by anti-slavery campaigners, who believed that slaveholders were illegitimately expanding and protecting slavery.

The Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were also examples of concessions to slavery, as they were seen by many Northerners as giving in to the demands of the South and the slaveholding class. The Supreme Court's Dred Scott v. Sanford decision in 1857 further entrenched the power of slaveholders, as it upheld the idea that African Americans had no rights that white people were bound to respect. It took the Civil War and the end of the Union to finally break the domination of the "Slave Power", bringing an end to seventy-two years of slaveholder domination.

Frequently asked questions