The Elastic Clause: Understanding The Us Constitution's Flexibility

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. The clause grants Congress the legislative power to make all laws that are deemed necessary and proper to execute the powers vested in the government of the United States. The Elastic Clause has been a subject of debate and interpretation, with the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) establishing that it grants implied powers to Congress in addition to its enumerated powers. The clause has been invoked in various contexts, including the creation of a national bank, healthcare debates, and the legalization of marijuana, and continues to be a significant factor in shaping federal laws and policies.

Explore related products

Flexibility in Constitutions: Forms of Closer Cooperation in Federal and Non-Federal Settings (2) (Hogendorp Papers)

$15.99 $54

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Overcoming Necessity: Emergency, Constraint, and the Meanings of American Constitutionalism

$14.46 $72

Constitutional Paradigms and the Stability of States

$52.43 $59.95

Federalism: A Very Short Introduction

$11 $12.99

The Federalist Papers: The Ideas that Forged the American Constitution (Arcturus Ornate Classics)

$12.99

The Elastic Clause is also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It grants Congress the power to make laws that are "necessary and proper" to execute the powers vested in the government by the Constitution. The clause is an enlargement of the powers expressly granted to Congress and gives Congress implied powers in addition to its enumerated powers.

The specific term "Necessary and Proper Clause" was coined in 1926 by Associate Justice Louis Brandeis, but the clause itself has been a part of the Constitution since 1787. The first Supreme Court case involving the clause was in 1819, McCulloch v. Maryland, which tested Congress's power to establish a national bank. In this case, the Court ruled that the Necessary and Proper Clause granted Congress implied powers, including the power to establish a bank, as it was a proper and suitable instrument to aid in carrying out its express powers.

The Elastic Clause has been interpreted to give Congress the flexibility to achieve the other 17 enumerated powers granted to it by the Constitution. For example, the clause has been used to justify the creation of a national bank, the regulation of production and consumption, and federal actions requiring integration in the states. It has also been invoked in more recent debates, such as those surrounding Obamacare, legalizing marijuana, and collective bargaining.

The interpretation of the Elastic Clause has been a source of contention between political parties, with arguments centering on the extent of the implied powers it grants to Congress. This debate is likely to continue for many years, as the clause provides a broad interpretation of congressional power that allows for significant legislative flexibility.

The Clause grants implied powers to Congress

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. The Clause grants implied powers to Congress, allowing it to make laws necessary for executing its express powers. This means that Congress can use all appropriate means to carry out its enumerated powers.

The specific term "Necessary and Proper Clause" was coined in 1926 by Associate Justice Louis Brandeis, though historically it was often called the Sweeping Clause. Other names for this clause include the Elastic Clause, the Basket Clause, and the Coefficient Clause.

The Clause was included in the Constitution to address the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, which had limited federal power to only those powers expressly delegated to the United States. The Elastic Clause grants Congress the authority to use all means "necessary and proper" to execute its powers, including implied and incidental powers that are conducive to the beneficial exercise of an enumerated power.

The first Supreme Court case involving the Clause was in 1819, when Maryland objected to Alexander Hamilton's formation of a National Bank. The Court ruled against Maryland, stating that while the Constitution did not explicitly permit the creation of a federal bank, it conferred upon Congress an implied power to do so under the Necessary and Proper Clause. This allowed Congress to realise its express taxing and spending powers.

The Necessary and Proper Clause has been used in various cases since, including challenges related to Obamacare, legalising marijuana, and collective bargaining. It has also been paired with the Commerce Clause to provide the constitutional basis for a wide range of federal laws, such as reforms under the New Deal.

The Clause was included in the Constitution in 1787

The Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. The Clause was included in the Constitution in 1787, in response to the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, which had limited federal power to only those powers expressly delegated to the United States. The Clause was intended to address this issue by granting incidental powers to Congress and providing a more flexible framework for governance.

The Elastic Clause states that Congress has the legislative power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." In other words, it gives Congress the authority to use all means "necessary and proper" to execute the powers granted to them by the Constitution.

The inclusion of the Elastic Clause in the Constitution was controversial at the time. Anti-Federalists expressed concern that the Clause would grant the federal government unlimited power and potentially threaten individual liberty. On the other hand, Federalists like Alexander Hamilton argued that the Clause was necessary to allow Congress to effectively carry out its duties and that it only permitted the execution of powers granted by the Constitution.

The first significant test of the Elastic Clause came in 1791, when Hamilton used it to defend the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States. This set a precedent for interpreting the Clause as granting implied powers to Congress beyond those explicitly enumerated in the Constitution. The landmark Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) further solidified this interpretation, ruling that Congress had the implied power to establish a national bank under the Elastic Clause.

Since then, the Elastic Clause has been invoked in various contexts to justify federal laws and actions, often in conjunction with other clauses like the Commerce Clause. It has been interpreted as granting Congress broad authority to enact legislation necessary for governing and fulfilling the objectives of the federal government.

Explore related products

Progressive States' Rights: The Forgotten History of Federalism (Constitutional Thinking)

$37.79 $44.99

The Federalist Papers, Extended Edition: An Essential Collection of The Original, Unabridged Text (1787–88) With Detailed Commentary on Each Essay to Guide you Through America's Founding Ideas

$24.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

FEDERALISM: How Decentralization Can Save America

$24.99

Freedom and Federalism

$17.99

Federalism and the Making of America

$30.77 $64.99

The first Supreme Court case against the Clause was in 1819

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a provision in the U.S. Constitution that grants Congress the power to pass laws deemed necessary for executing its enumerated powers. Interpretation of the clause has been a significant point of contention, particularly during debates over the establishment of a national bank in the late 18th century.

This ruling significantly expanded the scope of federal power and established a precedent for the government's ability to adapt and respond to changing needs. Chief Justice Marshall's opinion set a standard that continues to reverberate today. The McCulloch v. Maryland case reaffirmed Alexander Hamilton's view that legislation reasonably related to express powers was constitutional. Hamilton had previously argued for a broad interpretation of the Elastic Clause, asserting that the government should have the flexibility to enact laws that facilitate its constitutional responsibilities.

The McCulloch v. Maryland case also had a significant influence on American jurisprudence, shaping future cases that involved the Commerce Clause. For example, in Wickard v. Filburn (1942), the Supreme Court upheld a federal statute making it a crime for a farmer to produce more wheat than was allowed, even for personal consumption. The Necessary and Proper Clause was used to justify the regulation of production and consumption.

The Clause has been used in cases involving Obamacare, marijuana, and collective bargaining

The Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It grants Congress the power:

> To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

The Elastic Clause has been used to justify federal actions in a variety of cases, including those involving Obamacare, marijuana, and collective bargaining.

Obamacare

The Elastic Clause has been invoked in the debate over the federal government's role in creating a nationwide healthcare system, with some arguing that it provides the constitutional basis for Obamacare.

Marijuana

The federal government considers marijuana a Schedule 1 drug and therefore illegal. However, as of late 2018, the federal government has chosen not to enforce its current drug policy, allowing states to legalise the growth and distribution of marijuana. In 2005, the Supreme Court rejected California's challenge to federal drug laws banning marijuana in Gonzales v. Raich.

Collective Bargaining

In 1935, a case for creating and enforcing a collective bargaining provision in the National Labor Relations Act was the focus of a Congressional finding that refusal to bargain collectively leads to worker strikes, which burden and obstruct interstate commerce. The Elastic Clause has been used to argue that the federal government has the power to regulate interstate commerce, even in cases where the impact on interstate commerce may not be direct.

Frequently asked questions