Stephen A. Douglas's Opposition To Lecompton Constitution

The Lecompton Constitution was a pro-slavery document drafted in 1857 in Lecompton, Kansas, by pro-slavery advocates. It was the second of four proposed state constitutions of Kansas. The constitution was endorsed by President James Buchanan, who was a vocal supporter of enslaver rights. However, it was opposed by Stephen A. Douglas, a Democrat from Illinois, who argued that it violated the principle of popular sovereignty. Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution caused a rift within the Democratic Party, with Southerners feeling betrayed by his actions. This opposition also led to a break between Douglas and President Buchanan, as Douglas joined forces with the Republicans to block the Kansas statehood bill.

Explore related products

Kansas--Lecompton Convention. Speech of Senator Douglas, of Illinois, on the President's Message

$22.95

Speech of Senator Douglas, of Illinois against the Admission of Kansas under the Lecompton Constitution : Delivered in the Senate of the United States, March 22, 1858 1858 Leather Bound

$11.99

Kansas-Lecompton Convention: Speech of Senator Douglas, of Illinois, on the President's Message, Delivered in the Senate of the United States, December 9, 1858 (Classic Reprint)

$18.57

Kansas-Lecompton Convention: Speech of Senator Douglas of Illinois on the President's Message, Delivered in the Senate of the United States, December 9, 1857.

$24.8

Speech of Hon. S.A. Douglas, of Illinois, Against the Admission of Kansas Under the Lecompton Constitution. Delivered in the Senate of the United States, March 22, 1858

$9.95 $10.65

The Caning: The Assault That Drove America to Civil War

$36.98 $28

Stephen A. Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution was rooted in his belief in popular sovereignty

Stephen A. Douglas, a Democratic senator from Illinois, was a leading advocate of popular sovereignty for territories. He opposed the Lecompton Constitution because it lacked true popular sovereignty. The Lecompton Constitution was drafted by pro-slavery advocates and included provisions to protect slavery in the state of Kansas and exclude free people of colour from its bill of rights. It prevented the legislature from emancipating enslaved people without their enslavers' consent and full compensation.

Douglas's belief in popular sovereignty was rooted in his passion for self-government and the right of the people directly affected by an issue to decide for themselves. In the case of the Lecompton Constitution, he argued that the voters of Kansas should have the right to decide whether any slaves could enter their territory, not just whether more slaves would enter. This stand cost him support among southerners, who believed he was siding with the Republicans in preventing another slave state from entering the Union.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, based on Douglas's notion of popular sovereignty, required people to decide on the issue of slavery through their vote for a constitution for any new territory that desired to become a state. This act led to a series of events in Kansas and Missouri, known as "Bleeding Kansas," which culminated in violence and became a prelude to the Civil War. The Lecompton Constitution was one of the most controversial events during this period, with pro-slavery advocates in Lecompton, Kansas, writing, voting on, and submitting it to Congress in 1857.

Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution was not without consequences. Southerners felt betrayed by his actions and blacklisted him, which contributed to the Democratic Party running two sectional candidates in the 1860 election. Despite these consequences, Douglas remained steadfast in his belief in popular sovereignty and his opposition to the Lecompton Constitution, even breaking with President James Buchanan, who demanded Congress approve it and admit Kansas as a slave state. Douglas's stance represented a growing trend among Northern Democrats in the late 1850s, as it became increasingly difficult to justify slavery to their constituents.

Douglas's stance against the pro-slavery constitution was influenced by his desire to remove slavery from national politics

The Lecompton Constitution was a pro-slavery document drafted in 1857 in Lecompton, Kansas, by pro-slavery advocates. It was the second of four proposed state constitutions of Kansas. The constitution was named after the city of Lecompton, where it was drafted. It aimed to protect slavery in the state and exclude free people of colour from its bill of rights. It prevented the legislature from emancipating enslaved people without their enslavers' consent and full compensation.

Stephen C. Douglas, a Democrat from Illinois, opposed the Lecompton Constitution. He was the leading advocate of "popular sovereignty" for the territories and believed in self-government and the right of the people directly affected to decide for themselves on the issue at hand. Douglas's stance against the pro-slavery constitution was influenced by his desire to remove slavery from national politics. He argued that the voters of Kansas should have the right to decide whether any slaves could enter their territory. He wanted to allow the settlers in the territories to decide the issue of slavery themselves, removing it from Congress, where it was a heated and divisive topic.

Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution had significant consequences. It further divided the Democratic Party and cost him support among Southerners, who felt betrayed by his actions. His stance against the pro-slavery constitution was also influenced by the growing trend among Northern Democrats in the late 1850s, who found it increasingly difficult to defend slavery to their constituents. The rejection of the Lecompton Constitution by Kansas voters and its subsequent admission as a free state in 1861 highlighted the fraudulent voting practices that had marked earlier efforts.

The Lecompton Constitution's impact on the Democratic Party, causing a split and damaging consequences

The Lecompton Constitution, drafted in 1857, was a pro-slavery document that sought to enshrine slavery in Kansas and protect the rights of slaveholders. It was strongly opposed by Stephen A. Douglas, a leading Democrat and the author of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, who believed it violated the principle of popular sovereignty. Douglas's opposition to the constitution caused a significant rift within the Democratic Party, as he broke with President James Buchanan, who endorsed it, and sided with the Republicans in trying to block the Kansas statehood bill.

Douglas's stance had far-reaching consequences for the Democratic Party. It highlighted the growing divide between Northern and Southern Democrats, with Southerners feeling betrayed by Douglas's actions and blacklisting him. This divide ultimately led to the Democrats running two sectional candidates in the 1860 election: Stephen Douglas as the Northern Democrat candidate and John C. Breckenridge as the Southern Democrat candidate. This split in votes made it impossible for the Democrats to prevent Abraham Lincoln's election, which served as the catalyst for the secession of the lower South states.

Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution was driven by his belief in popular sovereignty, which held that the people of a territory should have the right to decide on the issue of slavery for themselves. In the case of Kansas, Douglas argued that voters should have the right to decide whether any slaves could enter the territory, not just whether more slaves would be allowed, as the Lecompton Constitution proposed. This position was in direct opposition to that of President Buchanan, who demanded Congress approve the constitution and admit Kansas as a slave state, despite evidence of electoral fraud and the clear majority of Kansans opposing slavery.

The impact of the Lecompton Constitution on the Democratic Party extended beyond the 1860 election. The party's inability to unite and its association with slavery damaged its reputation and weakened its political power. The crisis over the Lecompton Constitution, following on from the Kansas-Nebraska Act and "Bleeding Kansas," further exposed the fractures within the party and built the Republican base. Douglas's break with the party, therefore, had significant and lasting consequences, shaping the political landscape in the lead-up to the Civil War.

Explore related products

Speech of Hon. S. A. Douglas, of Illinois, Against the Admission of Kansas Under the Lecompton Constitution (Classic Reprint)

$29.57

The Great Debate Between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas in 1858 (Classic Reprint)

$29.97

Bleeding Kansas: Contested Liberty in the Civil War Era

$30.14 $34.99

Year of Meteors: Stephen Douglas, Abraham Lincoln, and the Election that Brought on the Civil War

$10.77 $29

The Presidency of James Buchanan (American Presidency Series)

$54.98

The Democratic Collapse: How Gender Politics Broke a Party and a Nation, 1856-1861 (Civil War America)

$22.99 $27.95

Douglas's opposition led to him challenging President James Buchanan's power, alienating Southern Democrats

The Lecompton Constitution was drafted in 1857 in Lecompton, Kansas, by pro-slavery advocates. It was the second of four proposed state constitutions of Kansas and was strongly pro-slavery. It included provisions to protect slavery in the state and excluded free people of colour from its bill of rights. It prevented the legislature from emancipating enslaved people without their enslavers' consent and full compensation.

Stephen Douglas, a Democrat from Illinois, opposed the Lecompton Constitution. He was the leading advocate of "popular sovereignty" for the territories and believed in self-government—the right of the people directly affected to decide for themselves on the issue at hand. Douglas's intentions, however, backfired, and Congress was forced to take sides. He vehemently opposed the Lecompton Constitution because it lacked true popular sovereignty. He argued that the voters of Kansas should have the right to decide whether any slaves could enter their territory.

Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution led him to challenge President James Buchanan's power. Buchanan, a vocal supporter of enslaver rights, endorsed the Lecompton Constitution before Congress. He demanded that Congress approve it and admit Kansas as a slave state. Douglas broke with Buchanan and joined the Republicans in trying to block the Kansas statehood bill. Buchanan's unrelenting support for the constitution alienated many Democrats, including Douglas.

Douglas's actions had significant consequences. Southerners felt betrayed and blacklisted him. This was one of the reasons the Democrats ran two sectional candidates in the 1860 election: Stephen Douglas as the Northern Democrat candidate and John C. Breckenridge as the Southern Democrat candidate. This split in votes made it impossible for the Democratic Party to stop Lincoln's election, which served as the main catalyst for the secession of the lower South states.

The consequences of Douglas's actions, including his break with the Democratic Party and the impact on his re-election bid

The consequences of Stephen Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution were significant, particularly in terms of his political relationships and his future electoral prospects.

Douglas's break with the Democratic Party over the Lecompton Constitution had far-reaching implications. His decision to oppose the constitution, which was endorsed by President James Buchanan, alienated him from the southern Democrats and the president himself. This fracture within the Democratic Party was profound, and it further built the base of the opposing Republican Party. Douglas's stance was viewed as a betrayal by southerners, who felt he was siding with the Republicans in preventing another slave state from entering the Union. As a result, he was effectively blacklisted by southerners, losing their support and damaging his political standing. This reaction to his actions had a notable impact on his future political endeavours, including his re-election bid and subsequent presidential campaign.

Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution also set him on a collision course with President Buchanan. By challenging the president's power and influence, Douglas risked his relationships within the Democratic Party and his own political future. This conflict with the president and the southern Democrats ultimately contributed to a split within the party during the 1860 election. The Democrats ran two sectional candidates: Stephen Douglas as the Northern Democrat candidate and John C. Breckenridge as the Southern Democrat candidate. This division made it difficult for the party to present a unified front, ultimately impacting their ability to secure the presidency.

The consequences of Douglas's actions extended beyond his break with the Democratic Party and into his re-election bid for the Senate in 1858. Despite facing a relatively unknown opponent in Abraham Lincoln, a member of the emerging Republican Party, Douglas had to engage in head-to-head campaigning to secure victory. The two men debated across Illinois on controversial topics, including slavery, popular sovereignty, and race equality. Lincoln's performance in these debates gained him recognition as an articulate anti-slavery leader, enhancing his political profile. Although Douglas ultimately won re-election to the Senate, Lincoln's growing prominence would later impact their presidential contest in 1860.

Douglas's opposition to the Lecompton Constitution, driven by his commitment to popular sovereignty, had both immediate and long-term repercussions. In the short term, it cost him support, particularly among southerners, and damaged his relationships within the Democratic Party. In the long term, it contributed to the party's split during the 1860 election, making it challenging for Douglas to secure the presidency. Additionally, the emergence of Lincoln as a political force, partially facilitated by their debates during the 1858 Illinois senatorial race, would further complicate Douglas's political ambitions.

Frequently asked questions