Death Penalty: Unconstitutional And Unjust

The constitutionality of the death penalty in America has been the subject of much debate and numerous Supreme Court cases. The Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, is often cited in these cases, as are the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause and the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Furman v. Georgia, a landmark case from 1972, is particularly notable as it resulted in a temporary suspension of the death penalty nationwide due to the arbitrary and capricious nature of sentencing. The Supreme Court has also addressed issues of discrimination in the administration of the death penalty, such as in McCleskey v. Kemp, and has excluded certain classes of people from capital punishment, including juveniles and the mentally handicapped. While some argue that the death penalty violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection, others defend it as serving the social purposes of retribution and deterrence.

Explore related products

Against the Death Penalty

$14.95 $16

Capital Punishment on Trial: Furman v. Georgia and the Death Penalty in Modern America (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$24.99 $29.99

The Death Penalty: Constitutional Issues, Commentaries, and Case Briefs

$43.92 $82.99

Arbitrary Death: A Prosecutor's Perspective on the Death Penalty

$9.99 $12.95

Cruel and Unusual

$24.99 $35

The Death Penalty (Concepts and Insights)

$45 $60

The death penalty violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection

The death penalty has been a contentious issue in the United States, with a long history of legal challenges and evolving legislation. One of the key constitutional issues with the death penalty is the violation of the guarantee of equal protection.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) argues that the death penalty inherently violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law. The death penalty is applied randomly and discriminatorily, disproportionately impacting people of colour, the poor, and those in certain geographic regions. In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Supreme Court invalidated existing death penalty laws, finding that they resulted in arbitrary and discriminatory sentencing, particularly against impoverished and minority communities. The Court set a standard that a punishment would be “cruel and unusual” if it was too severe for the crime, arbitrary, offensive to society's sense of justice, or less effective than a less severe penalty. This decision sparked a reevaluation of the death penalty and prompted legislative action to address systemic issues of discrimination.

The case of McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) further highlighted racial disparities in the administration of the death penalty. Evidence presented in this case demonstrated that defendants charged with killing white victims were more likely to receive the death penalty than those whose victims were Black, indicating racial bias in the system. This case centred on an African American man convicted of murder in Georgia, bringing to light the racial disparities in the imposition of the death penalty in that state.

The Supreme Court has also addressed issues related to the role of jurors and their discretion in capital cases, such as in Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968) and Crampton v. Ohio and McGautha v. California (1971). These cases dealt with the disqualification of jurors based on their attitudes towards capital punishment and the argument that unrestricted juror discretion resulted in arbitrary sentencing. The Court has "fine-tuned" the administration of the death penalty over time, considering factors such as the discretion given to prosecutors and juries in capital cases.

While the Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not inherently violate the Constitution, it has placed important limitations and guidelines on its use. The Eighth Amendment shapes procedural aspects regarding when a jury may impose the death penalty and how it must be carried out, and courts must consider evolving standards of decency in evaluating the constitutionality of punishments. However, critics argue that the death penalty is inherently cruel and unusual, wasting limited resources and failing as a viable form of crime control. The debate around the death penalty continues, with ongoing legal challenges and evolving interpretations of constitutional protections.

The death penalty is applied randomly and discriminatorily

The death penalty has been a contentious issue in the United States, with the Supreme Court playing a pivotal role in shaping its application. The constitutionality of capital punishment has been challenged on various grounds, including the arbitrary and discriminatory manner in which it is imposed. The landmark case of Furman v. Georgia in 1972 significantly influenced the trajectory of the death penalty in America.

In Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of arbitrariness in death penalty sentencing. The case involved William Henry Furman, an African American man convicted of murder during a botched burglary in Georgia. The Court held that the death penalty statutes in Georgia, which gave juries complete sentencing discretion, could result in arbitrary and capricious sentencing. This decision effectively suspended the death penalty nationwide and prompted states to reform their capital punishment laws.

The Furman decision highlighted systemic issues of discrimination in the administration of the death penalty. The Court found that the laws resulted in a disproportionate application, specifically discriminating against impoverished and minority communities. This sparked a wave of legislative action aimed at addressing these concerns, with states enacting new death penalty statutes to eliminate arbitrariness.

Another notable case addressing discrimination in the death penalty is McCleskey v. Kemp (1987). Warren McCleskey, an African American man convicted of murder in Georgia, presented evidence demonstrating racial disparities in the state's death penalty system. The Baldus study, a groundbreaking analysis of Georgia murder cases, found that defendants charged with killing white victims were more likely to receive the death penalty than those whose victims were Black. McCleskey's legal team argued that these disparities violated his constitutional rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

The death penalty has been criticized for its disproportionate impact on people of color, particularly when the victims are white. Additionally, it has been imposed randomly on the poor, uneducated, and individuals from certain geographic regions. These disparities have led to claims of a violation of the constitutional guarantee of equal protection.

While the Supreme Court has not categorically abolished the death penalty, it has placed restrictions on its application. The Court has excluded certain classes of people, such as juveniles and the mentally handicapped, from capital punishment. Additionally, it has clarified that the death penalty is unavailable for cases of child rape where the victim survives. These rulings reflect the Court's ongoing efforts to address the constitutional issues surrounding the death penalty and ensure fair and impartial sentencing.

The death penalty is disproportionately imposed on those with white victims

The death penalty has long been a contentious issue in the United States, with concerns about racial bias in sentencing. The race of the victim has been shown to play a significant role in determining whether the death penalty is imposed. Studies have found that a defendant is more likely to receive the death penalty if the victim is white, a phenomenon known as the "white victim effect".

In Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court invalidated existing death penalty laws, finding that they resulted in a disproportionate application of the death penalty and discriminated against minorities. This case set a precedent for evaluating the constitutionality of the death penalty and prompted states to reform their capital punishment laws. Despite these efforts, racial disparities persist in death penalty sentencing.

A 2007 study by Yale University School of Law found that African American defendants received the death penalty at three times the rate of white defendants when the victims were white. Similarly, a 2017 study in Oklahoma revealed that cases with white victims were significantly more likely to result in death sentences than cases with non-white victims. These findings are supported by other studies conducted in North Carolina and Louisiana, indicating a consistent pattern of racial bias in sentencing.

The racial bias in death penalty sentencing is influenced by several factors, including the composition of juries and the discretion of prosecutors. All-white or predominantly white juries are still common in many localities, and the presence of racial biases among jurors can impact sentencing decisions. Additionally, prosecutors have significant discretion in deciding which cases become capital cases, and their decisions may be influenced by implicit or explicit biases.

The issue of racial bias in the death penalty is not just a statistical disparity but a violation of constitutional rights. The Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, and the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees due process, have been invoked in legal challenges to address these disparities. Despite some progress, the death penalty continues to be imposed disproportionately based on the race of the victim, highlighting the need for further reforms to ensure a fair and impartial justice system.

Explore related products

Mandatory Justice: Eighteen Reforms to the Death Penalty (The Constitution Project)

$10

Reflections on Life, Death, and the Constitution

$19 $20

Race, Rape, and Injustice: Documenting and Challenging Death Penalty Cases in the Civil Rights Era

$39.95 $34

Arbitrary and Capricious: The Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the Death Penalty

$67.5 $75

The death penalty in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Reflection on the fate of death row inmates after the promulgation of the constitution on 18/02/2006.

$64.52

Beyond Repair?: America's Death Penalty (Constitutional Conflicts)

$19.22 $34.95

The death penalty is imposed disproportionately on people of colour

The death penalty has long been a controversial issue in the United States, with a range of constitutional issues arising from its use. One of the most significant and pressing concerns is the disproportionate imposition of the death penalty on people of colour. This issue has been the subject of much scrutiny and debate, with evidence suggesting that racial bias plays a significant role in who receives a death sentence.

Studies have consistently shown that defendants in death penalty cases are more likely to be people of colour, particularly if the victim is white. This disparity is deeply rooted in the history of racial discrimination and bias in the US criminal justice system. Numerous factors contribute to this disparity, including racial prejudice among jurors, prosecutors, and judges, as well as the overrepresentation of people of colour in the criminal justice system due to broader societal issues and discriminatory policing practices.

The racial bias in death penalty sentencing is evident when examining the demographics of death row inmates. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, as of April 1, 2020, people of colour accounted for 55% of those executed since 1976, despite making up less than 15% of the US population. Additionally, a 2017 study by the US Government Accountability Office found that, in the federal system, “prosecutors were more than three times as likely to seek the death penalty for black defendants as for defendants of other races or ethnicities.”

The racial disparities in death penalty sentencing have led to numerous legal challenges and constitutional issues. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law regardless of race. However, the disproportionate imposition of the death penalty on people of colour suggests that this right is not being upheld. Legal challenges have argued that racial bias in sentencing violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, as well as the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

To address these constitutional issues, some states have taken steps to eliminate the death penalty, while others have implemented reforms to reduce racial disparities. For example, the Supreme Court's ruling in Batson v. Kentucky (1986) attempted to address racial discrimination in jury selection by allowing defendants to challenge prosecutors' use of peremptory strikes on the basis of race. However, despite these efforts,

The death penalty is imposed disproportionately on the poor and uneducated

The death penalty has long been a contentious issue in the United States, with constitutional challenges dating back to the late 1960s. The Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, has been central to many of these challenges. While the Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty itself does not violate this amendment, it has placed important limitations on when and how it can be used.

One of the key constitutional issues with the death penalty is its disproportionate impact on the poor and uneducated. This issue was highlighted in Furman v. Georgia (1972), where the Supreme Court invalidated existing death penalty laws as they resulted in arbitrary and discriminatory sentencing, disproportionately affecting impoverished and minority communities. The Court's decision sparked a wave of legislative action to address these disparities, with many states reforming their capital punishment laws.

The inadequacy of legal representation for defendants who cannot afford private lawyers is a significant factor contributing to the disproportionate impact of the death penalty on the poor. As noted by Justice William O. Douglas in Furman, "One searches our chronicles in vain for the execution of any member of the affluent strata in this society". Inadequate legal assistance can result in wrongful convictions and unfair sentencing, disproportionately affecting those who cannot afford competent counsel.

Racial disparities in the imposition of the death penalty have also been well-documented, with African Americans making up a disproportionately large population of death row inmates relative to their percentage of the total population. This is evidenced by the fact that between 1930 and 1976, 405 out of 455 men executed for rape were black. Furthermore, racial bias and prosecutorial indifference to innocence have also been cited as factors contributing to the disproportionate impact of the death penalty on minorities and the poor.

The death penalty has also been criticised for its arbitrary nature, with sentencing discretion often resulting in unfair and inconsistent outcomes. This was addressed in U.S. v. Jackson (1968), where the Supreme Court held that requiring a jury recommendation for the death penalty was unconstitutional as it encouraged defendants to waive their right to a jury trial. The Court has continued to refine the requirements for imposing the death penalty, emphasising the need for an individualized sentencing process that considers the particular circumstances of the criminal.

Frequently asked questions