Scotus Ruling: Obergefell V. Hodges And The Constitutional Right To Marry

The landmark case of Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) saw the U.S. Supreme Court rule that state bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional, infringing on the fundamental right to marry, which is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling required all 50 states to perform and recognize same-sex marriages, marking a significant moment in the expansion of rights for America's LGBTQ+ community. The case centred on Jim Obergefell, who sued for recognition of his same-sex marriage, which was legal in the state where it took place but not in his home state. This marriage question and the recognition question formed the constitutional issues at the heart of the case, with the Court ultimately concluding that the right to marry cannot be limited to heterosexual couples.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$237.39 $359

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.38 $126.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The right to marry is fundamental

In Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. This ruling established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories, requiring all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Insular Areas to perform and recognize same-sex marriages on equal terms as opposite-sex marriages.

The Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges was based on the interpretation of the Constitution and the identification of fundamental rights. The Court has long held that marriage is a fundamental right, and in this case, it was argued that this right applies equally to same-sex couples. The denial of marriage to same-sex couples impedes legal rights and privileges in areas such as adoption, parental rights, and property transfer.

The Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges was guided by four principles and traditions. Firstly, the right to personal choice regarding marriage is inherent in individual autonomy, similar to decisions concerning family relationships and procreation. Secondly, the right to marry is fundamental as it supports a unique two-person union of great importance. Thirdly, the nature of injustice in history has taught us that the extent of freedom cannot always be known, and future generations may interpret rights differently. Finally, the Court's ruling was influenced by its own precedent in cases like Romer v. Evans, Lawrence v. Texas, and U.S. v. Windsor, which gradually expanded LGBTQ+ rights.

The ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges was a landmark decision that ended decades of controversy and debate surrounding same-sex marriage. While some states had already lifted bans and recognized same-sex marriage, this ruling ensured uniformity across the nation. The decision sparked mixed reactions, with some celebrating it as a victory for civil rights and others criticizing it as an act of will rather than legal judgment. Despite the differing opinions, Obergefell v. Hodges marked a significant step towards marriage equality in the United States.

The right to personal choice

The Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges upheld the right to personal choice in marriage, recognising it as a fundamental aspect of individual autonomy. The Court acknowledged that decisions concerning marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can make, on par with choices related to family relationships, procreation, and childrearing. This recognition underscored the importance of respecting an individual's autonomy and privacy in matters of the heart.

Prior to the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, same-sex marriage was already legal in 36 states, the District of Columbia, and Guam. However, the remaining 13 states had bans in place, creating a disparate situation across the country. The Supreme Court's decision ensured that same-sex couples were granted equal dignity in the eyes of the law, no matter where they resided. This ruling sent a powerful message that personal choice in marriage is a fundamental right that cannot be limited or restricted based on sexual orientation.

Additionally, the Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges built upon previous legal precedents that expanded the rights of the LGBTQ+ community. Cases such as Romer v. Evans (1996), Lawrence v. Texas (2003), and United States v. Windsor (2013) had already established important protections for sexual orientation and same-sex relationships. Obergefell v. Hodges further solidified these gains and extended them to the institution of marriage, ensuring that personal choice in this realm could not be denied on the basis of sexual identity.

In conclusion, the right to personal choice was a central tenet of the Obergefell v. Hodges case, which had far-reaching implications for marriage equality in the United States. By recognising the fundamental nature of marriage as a personal choice, the Supreme Court affirmed the rights of individuals to make intimate decisions about their lives, free from state interference. This ruling marked a significant step forward in ensuring that all Americans, regardless of sexual orientation, could enjoy the same freedoms and protections under the law.

The Fourteenth Amendment

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees that individuals cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. In the context of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Court found that the fundamental right to marry, which includes the liberty to enter into a marriage with the person of one's choice, is protected by the Due Process Clause. This liberty was previously recognised in cases such as Lawrence v. Texas, which established a broad constitutional right to sexual privacy.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to provide equal protection under the law, ensuring that similar individuals are treated similarly by the law. In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Court held that denying same-sex couples the right to marry violated the Equal Protection Clause. The Court found that marriage is a fundamental right that must be extended to same-sex couples, as the reasons for its fundamental nature apply equally to them. This decision built upon previous rulings, such as U.S. v. Windsor, which held that the federal government could not restrict its definition of marriage to heterosexual relationships.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights (Examples & Explanations Series)

$76.95 $76.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$75.91 $345

Due process and equal protection

In Obergefell v. Hodges, the US Supreme Court ruled that state bans on same-sex marriage and the refusal to recognise same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions were unconstitutional. The ruling was based on the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees certain procedures before a person is deprived of life, liberty, or property. In the context of Obergefell v. Hodges, the denial of marriage to same-sex couples impeded many legal rights and privileges, such as adoptions, parental rights, and property transfer. The Court held that the right to marry is a fundamental right that cannot be limited to heterosexual couples and falls under the protection of the Due Process Clause.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to treat all people similarly situated under the law alike. In the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Court found that same-sex couples were being denied the right to marry, which is a fundamental right. The Court ruled that the denial of this right to same-sex couples violated the Equal Protection Clause, as it treated them unequally compared to heterosexual couples.

The ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges was a landmark decision that established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories. It was the culmination of a 20-year trajectory in which the Court expanded the rights of the LGBTQ+ community, including the legalisation of same-sex sexual intercourse and the prohibition on the federal government restricting its definition of marriage to heterosexual relationships.

The decision in Obergefell v. Hodges was not without controversy. Some argued that the Court's ruling was an act of will, not legal judgment, and that it had no basis in the Constitution. However, the majority opinion, authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, concluded that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to all couples, regardless of sexual orientation. The Court's ruling ensured that same-sex couples were granted equal dignity in the eyes of the law, as guaranteed by the Constitution.

Same-sex marriage bans

In Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court held that the fundamental right to marry, which includes the personal choice regarding marriage, is guaranteed to same-sex couples by the Constitution. This decision marked the culmination of a 20-year trajectory of expanding rights for America's LGBTQ+ community.

Prior to the ruling, same-sex marriage had already been legalised in 36 states, the District of Columbia, and Guam. However, only 13 states maintained bans. The Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories. The ruling required all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognise same-sex marriages on equal terms as opposite-sex marriages.

The case was brought by Jim Obergefell and others, who sued for recognition of their same-sex marriages, which were legal in the states where they were married but not in others. The denial of marriage recognition impeded important legal rights and privileges, such as adoption, parental rights, and property transfer. The Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges ensured that same-sex couples could no longer be barred from marriage by individual states and that their marriages would be recognised across the nation.

The decision in Obergefell v. Hodges was not without controversy. Some argued that the ruling constituted an act of will, not a legal judgment, and that it had no basis in the Constitution. The Supreme Court, however, held that the fundamental right to marry, as protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, applies equally to same-sex couples. This decision built upon previous rulings, such as Lawrence v. Texas, which enshrined a broad constitutional right to sexual privacy, and U.S. v. Windsor, which stated that the federal government may not restrict its definition of marriage to heterosexual relationships.

Frequently asked questions