Open Vs. Secret Diplomacy: Understanding The Differences

Open diplomacy and secret diplomacy are two contrasting approaches to international negotiations. Open diplomacy, also known as public diplomacy, is a diplomatic approach that seeks to engage with the public and other non-state actors to promote mutual understanding, build relationships, and achieve diplomatic goals. It involves using various forms of communication, such as social media, public speaking, and cultural exchanges, to reach out to foreign publics and promote a positive image of a country or its policies. On the other hand, secret diplomacy involves conducting international negotiations without public scrutiny, often behind closed doors by government officials. While open diplomacy fosters transparency and trust, secret diplomacy may generate suspicion and distrust between nations. Open diplomacy aims to assist official actors in managing and resolving disputes by incorporating public opinion, while secret diplomacy faces the ethical dilemma of choosing between the ''dirty hand problem'' of deception and avoiding a greater evil, such as potential military conflict.

Explore related products

Essentials of International Relations

$78.92 $96.25

International Relations: A Very Short Introduction

$12.08 $12.99

Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives, Connections and Enduring Questions

$39.07 $49.45

The Oxford Handbook of International Relations

$47.44 $68

Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail

$19.39 $35

International Relations

$102.96

Open diplomacy is nongovernmental, informal, and involves unofficial interactions between private citizens or groups

Open diplomacy is a concept that has been shaped by the advancements in communication media, which has encouraged public dialogue on sensitive topics. It is a nongovernmental, informal process involving unofficial interactions between private citizens or groups, also known as non-state actors. Open diplomacy is not intended to replace traditional diplomacy but instead works alongside it to assist official actors in dispute resolution.

Open diplomacy is a direct and inclusive process, which aims to involve a wide range of participants to resolve global issues. It is characterised by meetings and consultations that are open to observers and the public, without arousing animosity. This type of diplomacy is particularly useful when traditional diplomacy fails, as it provides an opportunity for civil society and decision-makers to meet in unofficial environments to share ideas and start discussions.

The aim of open diplomacy is to assist official actors in managing and resolving disputes by discussing potential alternatives extracted from public opinion. It does not require substantive agreement or negotiating for advantage and can lead to more successful outcomes due to its collaborative and inclusive nature. Open diplomacy is particularly relevant in the modern social climate, where direct and feasible solutions are needed to address global problems such as pandemics and wars.

While open diplomacy has its advantages, it is important to note that it also has its dangers. The open and public nature of this type of diplomacy can sometimes contribute to the halt of negotiations between parties. This is because, while traditional diplomacy allows for more controlled and private dialogues, open diplomacy involves public influence, which can be a double-edged sword.

Traditional diplomacy is formal, governmental, and conducted across official government channels

One key aspect of traditional diplomacy is its formality. It follows established protocols, procedures, and etiquette, ensuring that interactions between nations are conducted in a structured and respectful manner. This formality helps maintain a sense of order and decorum in international relations.

Traditional diplomacy is also characterised by its governmental nature. It involves official government representatives, such as ambassadors, ministers, and heads of state, who are authorised to represent and negotiate on behalf of their respective countries. These representatives engage in bilateral or multilateral discussions, often following established agendas and procedures.

Furthermore, traditional diplomacy is conducted through official government channels. This means that communications and negotiations take place through recognised diplomatic pathways, such as embassies, consulates, and foreign ministries. These channels provide a structured framework for interactions between nations, ensuring that the appropriate protocols are followed.

While traditional diplomacy has been the predominant approach to international relations, it has also faced criticism. Some argue that traditional diplomacy can be slow and cumbersome, with a focus on formalities and procedures that may hinder swift resolution of pressing global issues. Additionally, traditional diplomacy is often conducted behind closed doors, leading to a lack of transparency and public involvement in decision-making processes that can affect their lives.

In contrast to traditional diplomacy, open diplomacy has emerged as a complementary approach. Open diplomacy is nongovernmental, informal, and involves unofficial interactions between private citizens or groups, known as non-state actors. It aims to assist official actors in resolving disputes by incorporating public opinion and seeking alternatives without the need for substantive agreement. Open diplomacy thrives due to advancements in communication technology, allowing for more public dialogue on sensitive topics.

Secret diplomacy involves agreements between sovereign states that are concealed from other states and the general public

Open diplomacy is nongovernmental, informal, and involves unofficial interactions and activities between private citizens or groups of individuals, also known as non-state actors. It differs from traditional diplomacy, which is formal, governmental diplomacy conducted across official government channels. Open diplomacy is not intended to be a substitute for traditional diplomacy, but rather, it assists official actors in managing and resolving disputes by discussing potential alternatives extracted from public opinion and without the need for substantive agreement or negotiating for advantage.

Open diplomacy, especially in the current modern social climate, performs better because of its inclusion, and the long-term options achieved through active collaboration. The role of open diplomacy in modern global governance is an open-ended method of looking at and navigating the environment, with a high degree of inclusivity in terms of who and what is involved in its process and strategy. Global governance seeks to provide services, especially peace and stability, justice and dispute resolution processes, working economies, and unified norms for trade and industry.

Secret diplomacy, on the other hand, involves agreements between sovereign states that are concealed from other states and the general public. This type of diplomacy poses interesting puzzles for students of diplomacy, as it involves strategic secrecy and can have significant impacts on international relations. For example, secret alliances formed before and during World War I were heavily criticized, and secret treaties promising territorial gains caused a great shock when they were revealed.

While open diplomacy brings more successful outcomes due to its inclusivity and public influence, it can also contribute to the halt of negotiations between parties. Traditional diplomacy, in contrast, allows for less open and public dialogues but facilitates the creation of multilateral policies through informed and international debates.

Explore related products

The Hundred-Year Marathon: China's Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower

$11.49 $19.99

Essentials of International Relations

$74.75 $83.75

The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics and International Relations (Oxford Quick Reference)

$18.8 $21.99

International Relations - For People Who Hate Politics: An Introduction to the Causes of Conflict and Cooperation Between States.

$13.99

Tactical Geopolitics: Master Global Affairs, Economic Warfare, and International Relations to Gain a Competitive Edge in Business, Investment, and Policy

$11.99

International Relations (11th Edition)

$109.99 $179.99

Open diplomacy brings more successful outcomes due to its inclusive nature and long-term options through active collaboration

Open diplomacy is a nongovernmental and informal process that involves unofficial interactions between private citizens or groups, also known as non-state actors. It is not intended to replace traditional diplomacy but rather to assist official actors in managing and resolving disputes by discussing potential alternatives informed by public opinion. Open diplomacy meetings are typically open to potential observers and members of the public, and they aim to resolve issues without creating animosity.

Open diplomacy brings more successful outcomes due to its inclusive nature and the long-term options it provides through active collaboration. Firstly, open diplomacy encourages the inclusion of diverse perspectives and stakeholders, such as civil society, legislators, and governments, working together to achieve mutual goals. This inclusivity fosters a collaborative environment, allowing for the exploration of a wide range of potential alternatives and increasing the chances of finding feasible solutions.

Secondly, open diplomacy provides long-term benefits through active collaboration. By involving a broad spectrum of participants, open diplomacy creates a network of support and mutual understanding. This collaborative approach ensures that even if official diplomatic talks fail, there is a backup system in place. Civil society and decision-makers can meet informally, share ideas, and initiate discussions to reach a consensus. This aspect of open diplomacy is particularly valuable in modern global governance, which requires flexibility and adaptability in addressing complex global challenges.

Moreover, open diplomacy has been significantly enhanced by advancements in communication technologies. The rise of modern media and communication platforms has facilitated numerous opportunities for public dialogue on sensitive topics. This shift in the language of interactions within governments has encouraged more transparent and inclusive discussions, which can lead to more effective and accountable decision-making.

However, it is important to acknowledge the potential challenges of open diplomacy. While it promotes transparency and inclusivity, the very nature of open discussions and public influence can sometimes hinder negotiations between parties. Traditional diplomacy, with its more closed and controlled approach, may be preferred in certain sensitive situations. Nevertheless, open diplomacy's ability to engage a diverse range of participants and its focus on long-term collaboration make it a powerful tool for achieving successful outcomes, especially in addressing pressing global issues.

Global governance 1.5 can be applied to open diplomacy by bringing together civil society, legislators, and governments to work towards mutual goals

Open diplomacy is nongovernmental, informal, and involves unofficial interactions and activities between private citizens or groups of individuals, also known as non-state actors. It differs from traditional diplomacy, which is formal, governmental, and conducted across official channels. Open diplomacy is not intended to be a substitute for traditional diplomacy but rather to assist official actors in managing and resolving disputes by discussing potential alternatives extracted from public opinion.

Secret diplomacy, on the other hand, refers to agreements between sovereign states that are concealed from other states and the general public. An example of this is the secret alliances that European great powers entered into before and during World War I, which caused a great shock when they were revealed.

Global governance refers to the complex of formal and informal institutions, mechanisms, relationships, and processes between and among states, markets, citizens, and organizations, both inter- and non-governmental, through which collective interests on the global plane are articulated, rights and obligations are established, and differences are mediated. It involves cooperative problem-solving arrangements that can take the form of laws or formally constituted institutions, such as state authorities, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), private sector entities, and civil society actors.

Global governance 1.5, as proposed by authors like Isabelle Vladoiu, suggests that global governance can be applied to open diplomacy by bringing together civil society, legislators, and governments to work towards mutual goals. Civil society is a complex community consisting of organizations with different profiles, such as advocacy groups, grassroots communities, technical communities, academic and research communities, think tanks, capacity-building institutions, and new media outlets. By engaging with civil society, legislators, and governments, global governance 1.5 can facilitate the formation of a backup system where these networks support and uplift each other. In the event of a failure in government diplomatic talks, civil society and decision-makers can meet in unofficial environments to share ideas and initiate discussions to reach a mutual understanding. This approach can be particularly effective in modern times due to the numerous opportunities for public dialogue on sensitive topics and the shift towards more inclusive practices.

Frequently asked questions