The Preamble: What's Missing And Why It Matters

what is not mentioned in the preamble of our constitution

The Preamble to the Constitution of India is a concise and comprehensive introduction that outlines the philosophy and objectives of the Constitution. It is a reflection of the nation's identity, its democratic ethos, and its foundational principles. The Preamble was adopted on 26 November 1949 by the Constituent Assembly of India and came into effect on 26 January 1950. It has been amended only once through the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976, which added the terms ''socialist', 'secular', and 'integrity' and replaced 'unity of the nation' with 'unity and integrity of the nation'. Notably, the Preamble does not mention the names of 'God' and 'Gandhi', despite debates during the Constituent Assembly. The Preamble is considered an integral part of the Constitution and plays a crucial role in interpreting its statutes and provisions, but it is not directly enforceable in a court of law.

Characteristics Values
God Not mentioned due to opposition
Gandhi Not mentioned due to opposition
Enforceable in a court of law No

cycivic

The preamble is not enforceable in a court of law

The preamble to a constitution is an introductory statement that communicates the intentions and purpose of the document. While it sets the stage for the constitution, it is not considered a source of power or a grantor of rights. Instead, it is an aspirational statement that outlines the goals and responsibilities of the government.

In the context of the Indian Constitution, the preamble has been the subject of several Supreme Court cases, including the Berubari Case and the Kesavananda Bharati Case. In the Berubari Case, the Court stated that the preamble "is the key to open the mind of the makers" but cannot be considered a part of the Constitution and is therefore not enforceable in a court of law. However, in the Kesavananda Bharati Case, the Court held that the preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and can be amended under Article 368. Despite this, it was affirmed that the basic structure of the preamble, including its core principles, cannot be altered.

The preamble to the Indian Constitution has undergone one amendment, the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976, which added the terms 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity'. The inclusion of these terms reflects the country's established form of government, the election of the head of state, and the promotion of unity and integrity among citizens.

While the preamble to the Indian Constitution is recognised as an integral part of the document, it is not directly enforceable in a court of law. This means that while it provides important context and interpretation for understanding the Constitution, it does not confer substantive powers or rights that can be legally enforced.

In summary, the preamble to a constitution, including the Indian Constitution, serves as an introductory statement of aspirations and intentions. While it holds significant value, it is not considered a source of power or a grantor of enforceable rights. The preamble to the Indian Constitution, in particular, has been the subject of legal debate, ultimately concluding that it is an integral part of the Constitution but not directly enforceable by the courts.

Florida Real Estate: Defining a Bedroom

You may want to see also

cycivic

The term 'Socialist' was added in 1976

The preamble to the Constitution of India is a powerful statement that outlines the nation's identity, democratic ethos, and foundational principles. Amended only once on December 18, 1976, during the Forty-second Amendment of the Constitution, the addition of the term "socialist" has been a significant point of discussion.

During the Indian Emergency, the Indira Gandhi government introduced several changes, including inserting the words “socialist” and “secular" between “Sovereign” and “Democratic." This change reflected a commitment to a welfare state, ensuring equality of opportunity without mandating specific economic policies. The amendment also changed “unity of the Nation” to “unity and integrity of the Nation," emphasizing India's nature as a “Union of States."

The inclusion of "socialist" in the preamble has been contested by some. Petitioners argued that the addition of ideological terms during the Emergency period lacked genuine public consultation and fundamentally altered the philosophical framework envisioned by the framers. They claimed that the term restricted economic policy choices for democratically elected governments. However, the Supreme Court clarified that "socialist" reflected a commitment to equality of opportunity and that the Constitution is a living document that evolves to suit the country's needs.

The debate over the term "socialist" in the preamble highlights the dynamic nature of constitutional interpretation. While some argued for a strict interpretation, others emphasized the evolving nature of constitutional values. The Supreme Court's ruling stressed that ideas like socialism and secularism are well-accepted by the people, demonstrating the ongoing dialogue between India's founding principles and the evolving societal context.

In conclusion, the addition of the term "socialist" to the preamble of India's constitution in 1976 was a significant event that reflected the country's commitment to equality and welfare. While it sparked debates about procedural propriety and philosophical shifts, the Supreme Court upheld the inclusion, recognizing the evolving nature of constitutional interpretation and the need to adapt to contemporary challenges.

cycivic

The preamble does not mention 'God'

The preamble to the US Constitution does not mention God. This is notable because references to God are common in the preambles of other nations' constitutions. These references are called invocationes dei ('invocation of God') if the text is proclaimed in the name of a deity, and nominationes dei ('naming of God') if the reference is in another context.

The omission of God from the US Constitution's preamble is especially interesting when compared to the Declaration of Independence, which mentions God and justifies a rebellion to secure God-given rights. The Constitution, on the other hand, is a secular document that promotes no particular sect and takes no theological position. This is in keeping with the view of religion as a matter of individual choice that was common in eighteenth-century America.

The US Constitution's secular nature is also reflected in its preamble, which sets out wholly secular objectives: "to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty."

While the US Constitution does not mention God, it also does not demand a secular society. The Bill of Rights, for example, did not call for an end to religious tests. However, the current crisis over state interference in religion is seen as a departure from the "founding principles."

The inclusion of God in a constitution can serve several purposes. It can be used to legitimize governmental power by declaring it to be exercised according to God's will, express governmental support for a specific religion, or acknowledge the inherent limitations of human law and power. However, in modern democratic constitutions, references to God are no longer seen as expressing the divine right of kings.

cycivic

The preamble does not mention 'Gandhi'

The Indian Constitution's preamble, as amended up to July 2024, reads:

> WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC ... IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.

The preamble is based on the Objectives Resolution, which was moved in the Constituent Assembly by Jawaharlal Nehru on December 13, 1946, accepted on January 22, 1947, and adopted by the Constituent Assembly on November 26, 1949, coming into force on January 26, 1950.

The preamble does not mention Gandhi, despite his status as the Father of the Nation. During the Constituent Assembly's debate on the Preamble, there was a proposal to include Gandhi's name, but it was rejected by Brajeshwar Prasad, who argued that the Constitution was not a Gandhian one and therefore should not bear his name. Prasad stated:

> "I do not want that the name of Mahatma Gandhi should be incorporated in this Constitution, because it is not a Gandhian Constitution.... If we had a Gandhian Constitution, I would have been the first to offer my support. I do not want that the name of Mahatma Gandhi should be dragged in this rotten Constitution."

Shibban Lal Saxena also proposed that the Preamble begin with an invocation of God and Gandhi, suggesting:

> "In the name of God the Almighty, under whose inspiration and guidance, the Father of our Nation, Mahatma Gandhi, led the Nation from slavery into Freedom, by unique adherence to the eternal principles of Satya and Ahimsa, and who sustained the millions of our countrymen and the martyrs of the Nation in their heroic and unremitting struggle to regain the Complete Independence of our Motherland."

However, this proposal was also withdrawn due to concerns about including Gandhi's name in a document that could be "changed and reshaped at any time." As a result, the Indian Constitution was adopted without invoking any human or divine entity.

How to Be Social Media Active

You may want to see also

cycivic

The preamble is an integral part of the constitution

The preamble to a constitution is an introductory statement that outlines the intentions, principles, and goals of the document. It sets the tone and provides context for the constitution, highlighting the values that are important to the nation. While it is not a source of legal power or a definition of government powers and individual rights, it serves as a crucial interpretive guide for understanding the constitution as a whole.

In the United States, the Preamble to the Constitution begins with the famous words, "We the People of the United States," emphasizing the democratic nature of the nation. It goes on to state the purposes for which the Constitution was established, including establishing justice, ensuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and securing the blessings of liberty for all Americans. These objectives reflect the aspirations of the American people and set the stage for the rights and responsibilities outlined in the main body of the Constitution.

The Preamble to the Indian Constitution has also undergone amendments, with the terms 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' being added in 1976. The inclusion of these terms highlights the importance of maintaining society's integrity, promoting unity among citizens, and ensuring that the nation remains secular and democratic. The Indian Supreme Court has affirmed the integral nature of the preamble, stating that it plays a significant role in interpreting the statutes and provisions of the Constitution.

The preamble is often referred to as a "job description" by the people for their government, outlining the goals and responsibilities expected of those in power. It is a reminder to the government of the values and principles they should uphold and the aspirations of the citizens they represent. While the preamble may not be directly enforceable in a court of law, it provides a critical framework for interpreting and understanding constitutional law and the intentions of its framers.

In conclusion, the preamble is an integral part of a constitution as it communicates the fundamental values, aspirations, and purposes that underpin the nation's laws and governance. It serves as a constant reminder of the social contract between the people and their government, guiding the interpretation and application of constitutional principles in a manner that aligns with the nation's founding ideals.

Frequently asked questions

The preamble is an integral part of the Constitution, but it is not directly enforceable in a court of law. It acts as an introduction or preface, outlining the philosophy, objectives, and purpose of the Constitution.

The preamble is not the supreme power or a source of restriction, but it helps interpret ambiguous areas of the Constitution. It is considered the "Identity Card of the Constitution", reflecting the nation's identity and foundational principles.

The preamble emphasizes the sovereignty of the people and that the government's power flows from them. It reflects India's commitment to being a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic, promoting equality, liberty, and justice.

During the Constituent Assembly debates, proposals to rename India the "Union of Indian Socialistic Republics" and include the names of "God" and "Gandhi" were rejected. The inclusion of "God" was voted against to maintain freedom of faith, and Gandhi's name was excluded due to dissatisfaction with the Constitution's basis.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment