Constitution Supremacy: Understanding The Ultimate Law Of The Land

The Supremacy Clause, or constitutional supremacy, is a concept that establishes the constitution as the supreme law of the land, with federal laws taking precedence over state laws in the event of a conflict. This principle, found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, ensures that the constitution and federal laws are supreme over state laws and constitutions, shaping the law of the United States for over 200 years. The Supremacy Clause was introduced to address the lack of a similar provision in the Articles of Confederation, which governed the United States from 1781 to 1789, and to prevent conflicts between federal and state laws. It is considered a cornerstone of the US federal political structure, playing a significant role in managing the nation's affairs and shaping its legal system.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$237.39 $359

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.38 $126.95

The Supremacy Clause

The inclusion of the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution was not a highly contentious issue during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. However, it sparked intense controversy during debates over the Constitution's ratification, with advocates of federal supremacy ultimately prevailing. The Supremacy Clause played a significant role in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, as the Supreme Court relied on it to establish a robust role for the federal government in managing the nation's affairs.

Federal preemption

The Supremacy Clause, or constitutional supremacy, is a clause in the US Constitution that establishes the Constitution, federal statutes, and US treaties as the "supreme law of the land". This means that in the event of a conflict between federal and state law, the federal law will prevail and state judges are required to follow it, regardless of what the state law or state constitution declares. The Supremacy Clause was included in the Constitution to address the lack of a similar provision in the Articles of Confederation, which governed the United States from 1781 to 1789. The absence of such a clause in the Articles meant that federal statutes did not bind state courts in the absence of state legislation implementing them.

The doctrine of preemption is used to determine whether a federal law and a state law are in conflict. If a federal law exists in an area where the Constitution grants authority to Congress under its enumerated powers, that federal law prevents any conflicting state law from taking effect. However, it is important to note that federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution and cannot violate constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, which allows it to invalidate statutes that violate the Constitution.

The Supremacy Clause and the concept of federal preemption have been important in shaping the law of the United States and ensuring national union. They provide a framework for resolving conflicts between federal and state laws and establish the priority of federal authority within the boundaries of the Constitution.

Conflict-of-laws

The Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under the authority of the United States, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land". This means that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties take precedence over any conflicting state laws. The Supremacy Clause is essentially a conflict-of-laws rule, ensuring that federal acts supersede state acts in cases of conflict.

The Supremacy Clause provides that state courts are bound by, and state constitutions are subordinate to, the supreme law. This means that state courts cannot rely on state laws that conflict with federal laws or statutes. The Supremacy Clause also includes the Constitution's most explicit references to "judicial review", empowering the US Supreme Court to exercise the power of judicial review by invalidating a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution.

While the Supremacy Clause establishes the priority of federal law over state law, it is important to note that federal statutes and treaties must still operate within the parameters of the Constitution. They must be pursuant to the federal government's enumerated powers and not violate constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights. The Tenth Amendment, for example, states that the federal government only has the powers delegated to it by the Constitution.

The interpretation and application of the Supremacy Clause have been the subject of numerous court cases over the years. For instance, in California v. ARC America Corp. (1989), the Supreme Court held that if Congress expressly intended to act in an area, it would trigger the enforcement of the Supremacy Clause and nullify the conflicting state action. In another case, Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council (2000), the Court found that even when a state law is not in direct conflict with a federal law, it could still be found unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause if it hinders Congress's objectives.

In conclusion, the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution is a fundamental principle that resolves conflict-of-laws issues between federal and state laws by establishing the supremacy of the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties as the "supreme Law of the Land". This clause ensures that federal acts take precedence over conflicting state acts, providing clarity and finality in legal disputes.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$75.91 $345

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights (Examples & Explanations Series)

$76.95 $76.95

Judicial review

The Supremacy Clause, or Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, establishes the supremacy of the Constitution, federal statutes, and US treaties as the "supreme law of the land". This means that in the event of a conflict between federal and state law, federal law prevails and takes precedence over state law. The Supremacy Clause is a cornerstone of the US federal political structure, ensuring national union and preventing constant power struggles between the states and the federal government.

The inclusion of the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution was a response to the lack of a similar provision in the Articles of Confederation, which governed the United States from 1781 to 1789. The absence of such a clause in the Articles resulted in federal statutes not binding state courts unless there was state legislation implementing them. The Supremacy Clause was introduced during the Philadelphia Convention in May 1787, also known as the Federal Convention, and was unanimously passed.

The Supremacy Clause has been interpreted as a conflict-of-laws rule, prioritising certain federal acts over conflicting state acts. This interpretation is supported by the text of the Supremacy Clause, which states that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties made under the authority of the United States are the supreme law of the land, binding judges in every state. This interpretation is further reinforced by the doctrine of preemption, which holds that federal law preempts state law when there is a conflict between the two.

The power of judicial review is an important aspect of the Supremacy Clause. Judicial review refers to the ability of the judiciary, specifically the Supreme Court, to review and invalidate statutes, laws, or actions of the executive branch that are deemed unconstitutional. This power ensures that federal policies and laws comply with the Constitution and do not exceed the federal government's enumerated powers. Judicial review also extends to treaties, where the Supremacy Clause allows treaties to directly establish rules of decision for American courts, provided they do not violate other constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights.

The concept of constitutional supremacy, as discussed by Paolo Sandro in "The Making of Constitutional Democracy", highlights the ability of the constitution to establish a hierarchical primacy within the legal system. This means that in cases of conflict, the constitution takes precedence over any other norm or legislation, and it conditions the interpretation of other norms to ensure consistency with constitutional imperatives. This implies the subordination of the legislature to the constitution and, by extension, to the judiciary, which has the power to interpret and enforce the constitution.

Doctrine of dual federalism

The Supremacy Clause is a cornerstone of the United States' federal political structure. It is a constitutional provision that identifies the supremacy of federal law, assuming the underlying priority of federal authority. The Supremacy Clause was introduced as part of the New Jersey Plan during the Federal Convention of 1787. It was ratified in 1788, and it asserts that the Constitution and the laws of the United States made under its authority are the supreme law of the land. This means that federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution and that judges in every state are bound by this law, regardless of state laws to the contrary.

The Supremacy Clause was a response to the problems with the Articles of Confederation, which lacked a provision declaring federal law superior to state law. The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, established a weak federal government with limited powers, leading to a backlash and calls for a stronger central government. This resulted in the Constitutional Convention and the creation of the Supremacy Clause, which established federal supremacy and addressed conflicts between federal and state laws.

The Doctrine of Dual Federalism, also known as layer-cake federalism or divided sovereignty, is a political arrangement that emerged from the Supremacy Clause. It lasted until around the New Deal era during Franklin Roosevelt's presidency in 1937. Under this doctrine, the federal and state governments were treated as "separate sovereigns, each preeminent in its own fields but lacking authority in the other's." Dual federalism is characterised by a clear division of power between the federal and state governments, with each exercising sovereignty within its respective sphere. This system contrasts with cooperative federalism or marble-cake federalism, where federal and state governments collaborate on policy.

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Supreme Court embraced the doctrine of dual federalism, minimising conflicts between federal and state authority. While federal supremacy was a background principle, the Court's bifurcation of authority limited the Supremacy Clause's role. The Court applied the basic principle of federal supremacy but within the framework of dual federalism, reinforcing the sharp division of federal and state powers.

Several seminal court cases during this era further clarified the scope of federal power under dual federalism. For example, in McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a federally chartered bank, interpreting the Constitution in favour of federal power. In other cases, such as Plessy v. Ferguson, the Court ruled in favour of states' rights, allowing them to enforce laws that infringed on individual rights, such as racially segregated accommodations. These decisions reflected a balance between states' rights and the protection of civil liberties within the dual federalism framework.

Frequently asked questions