Seidman's Constitutional Command: A Dynamic Interpretation

Louis Michael Seidman, a constitutional law scholar, has argued for the retention of certain constitutional commands that promote a functioning democracy. One of the most notable commands that Seidman believes should be kept is the right to freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. This right allows individuals to express their ideas and opinions without fear of censorship or punishment and is considered essential for a thriving democracy. Seidman also supports the structure of Congress being divided into two houses, the House of Representatives and the Senate, as it promotes checks and balances within the legislative process.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (Aspen Casebook)

$128 $269

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$241.98 $359

Constitutional Law + CasebookConnect (Aspen Casebook Series)

$75 $269

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$75.91 $345

Constitutional Law: Cases, Comments, and Questions (American Casebook Series)

$300

Constitutional Law: 2020 Supplement (Supplements)

$11.37 $53

Freedom of speech

Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center, is known for his contributions to critical legal studies and constitutional legal theory. In an article in the New York Times in 2012, Seidman argued that we should give up the constitution but keep some aspects of it, including freedom of speech.

Seidman believes that the constitutional command of freedom of speech, as stated in the First Amendment, should be kept. This right is essential for democracy, allowing individuals to express their ideas and opinions freely without fear of government censorship or punishment. The First Amendment states:

> "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This provision protects not only spoken words but also written expression, symbolic speech, and other forms of communication. Freedom of speech, also known as freedom of expression, is considered one of the basic rights of human beings. It entails that people should be able to express their opinions on issues freely without fear, as long as it is not libelous, seditious, or harmful to national security.

Seidman also supports the structure of Congress being divided into two houses (the House of Representatives and the Senate) as it promotes checks and balances within the legislative process.

Freedom of religion

Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center, is known for his contributions to critical legal studies and constitutional legal theory. Seidman believes that certain aspects of the Constitution, such as freedom of speech, equal protection under the law, and freedom of religion, are essential.

With regards to freedom of religion, Seidman argues that it is a fundamental right that individuals should have the liberty to follow any religion they choose without repression. This view aligns with the broader definition of a constitution, which includes guaranteeing the fundamental rights of citizens.

The right to freedom of religion is a crucial aspect of a democratic society, allowing individuals to freely express their religious beliefs and practices without fear of persecution or discrimination. This freedom also promotes religious tolerance, diversity, and mutual understanding in society.

While Seidman advocates for the preservation of certain constitutional commands, he also critiques other aspects of the Constitution. He supports structural elements that promote a functioning democracy, such as a bicameral legislature with two distinct chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. This system, as intended by the framers of the U.S. Constitution, ensures checks and balances, encourages collaboration and compromise among representatives, and provides diverse representation.

Congress divided into two houses

Louis Michael Seidman, a prominent constitutional law scholar, believes that Congress should be divided into two houses, namely the House of Representatives and the Senate. This bicameral system is crucial for a functioning democracy as it promotes checks and balances within the legislative process.

The House of Representatives and the Senate must both approve a bill before it becomes law. This process encourages collaboration, deliberation, and compromise among elected representatives, preventing hasty decisions that could arise from a single, unified legislative body. It also ensures diverse representation, allowing for representation by both population (in the House) and equality among states (in the Senate).

The framers of the U.S. Constitution, influenced by Enlightenment thinkers such as Montesquieu, intended for a legislative body that would allow for this balance. Seidman's support for this structure reflects his acknowledgment of the importance of maintaining certain foundational elements that promote a functioning democracy, even as he advocates for the reform of certain outdated constitutional commands.

While Seidman critiques various aspects of the Constitution, he recognises the value of a bicameral legislature in fostering a balanced government that can effectively respond to the needs of the populace. This division of Congress into two distinct chambers encourages a collaborative and thoughtful approach to law-making, contributing to a stable and representative democracy.

Explore related products

High Court Case Summaries on Constitutional Law (Keyed to Stone, Seidman, Sunstein, Tushnet, and Karlan)

$45.75

Constitutional Law: Principles and Practice

$129.99 $193.95

Constitutional Law 2022 Supplement

$22.43 $70

On Constitutional Disobedience (Inalienable Rights)

$47.99 $52

Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (Aspen Treatise)

$117.28

Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory

$44.95 $49

Checks and balances

Louis Michael Seidman, a prominent constitutional law scholar, believes that certain structural elements of the US Constitution should be kept to promote a functioning democracy. One of the key elements he advocates for is the division of Congress into two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. This bicameral system is crucial for maintaining checks and balances within the legislative process and ensuring diverse representation.

The idea of checks and balances is deeply rooted in the US Constitution and was influenced by Enlightenment thinkers such as Montesquieu. The framers of the Constitution intended to create a legislative body that would allow for both representation by population and equality among states. By dividing Congress into two houses, the system provides a check on the power of each branch, preventing tyranny and ensuring a balanced response to the needs of the populace.

The House of Representatives and the Senate must both approve a bill before it becomes a law. This process encourages collaboration, deliberation, and compromise among elected representatives. It prevents hasty decisions that could arise from a single, unified legislative body. The bicameral system acts as a check on the legislative power, ensuring that laws are carefully considered and represent the interests of both the people and the states.

Additionally, Seidman emphasizes the importance of certain fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Freedom of speech, as enshrined in the First Amendment, allows individuals to express their ideas and opinions without fear of government censorship or punishment. It encourages open discussion, promotes diverse viewpoints, and holds the government accountable. Similarly, freedom of religion guarantees the right for people to follow any religion they choose without repression. These rights provide checks on governmental power and protect the fundamental freedoms of citizens.

In summary, Seidman's views on checks and balances focus on maintaining a bicameral legislative system and preserving fundamental rights. The division of Congress into two houses ensures a system of checks and balances, diverse representation, and a balanced response to the populace's needs. Additionally, freedoms such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion act as checks on governmental power, safeguarding the rights and liberties of the people.

Right to assemble

Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center, is known for his contributions to critical legal studies and constitutional legal theory. Seidman argues that certain aspects of the Constitution should be retained, including freedom of speech, equal protection under the law, and freedom of religion.

One of the constitutional commands that Seidman believes should be kept is the right to freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Freedom of speech allows individuals to express their ideas and opinions without fear of government censorship or punishment. This right is considered fundamental for a thriving democracy as it encourages open discussion and debate. The First Amendment specifically states: "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The right to peaceably assemble, as mentioned in the First Amendment, is an essential part of freedom of speech. This right protects the ability of individuals to gather and assemble peacefully for various purposes, such as protests or demonstrations. It ensures that people can collectively express their views and engage in organized activities without interference or restriction from the government.

The right to assemble has been the subject of several landmark Supreme Court cases. For example, in Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), the Court upheld the right of students to wear armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War, demonstrating the importance of freedom of speech in educational institutions. Similarly, in Texas v. Johnson (1989), the Court protected the act of burning the American flag as a form of symbolic speech under the First Amendment.

Seidman emphasizes the significance of freedom of speech as a basic human right. He argues that individuals should be able to express their opinions and ideas freely, as long as they do not engage in libel, sedition, or harm national security. This right is crucial for democracy, enabling open dialogue, diverse viewpoints, and accountability of the government.

Frequently asked questions