Where Do Excess Political Campaign Contributions Go?

Campaign financing in the United States is a big business, with candidates for the 2020 presidential cycle drawing in a staggering $4.1 billion in donations. With such large sums of money involved, the question of what happens to excess political campaign contributions is an important one. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has rules in place to control how this money is spent and has outlined permitted uses, which include charitable donations, donations to other candidates, and saving it for future campaigns. However, personal use of these funds is prohibited, and there are limits on how much can be donated to specific candidates or parties. With the cost of campaigns rising faster than inflation, understanding the lifecycle of political contributions is crucial for maintaining transparency and accountability in the democratic process.

Explore related products

Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®

$12.77 $16.95

The Campaign Finance Cases: Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$20.67 $29.99

The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook

$31.83

Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values)

$19.84 $32

Campaign Finance & American Democracy: What the Public Really Thinks and Why It Matters

$2.99 $32

Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail

$29.95

Excess funds can be used for charitable donations

Excess political campaign contributions can be used for charitable donations, but there are rules in place that dictate how money can be spent after a campaign concludes. Firstly, it is important to note that a campaign is prohibited from retaining contributions that exceed the limits. In the event that a campaign receives excessive contributions, it must follow special procedures for handling such funds.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has rules in place to control how money raised by candidate campaign committees is spent after a candidate bows out, or after an election is officially over. The FEC strongly recommends that campaigns encourage contributors to designate their contributions for specific elections. Designated contributions ensure that the contributor’s intent is conveyed to the candidate’s campaign and promote consistency in reporting, thereby avoiding the possible appearance of excessive contributions on reports.

When it comes to charitable donations, permitted uses include donations to charities as long as the candidate does not receive any compensation from the organizations before it is spent and the donation is not used by the charity to benefit the candidate. The FEC also allows for a donation of a maximum of $2,000 to another federal candidate, and donations to state or local candidates subject to state law.

Additionally, candidates are not allowed to use any remaining funds for personal use after all campaign-related debts are settled. Personal use is defined as “a commitment, obligation or expense of any person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s campaign or responsibilities as a federal officeholder”.

Donations to other candidates are allowed

Political campaigns can be costly affairs, with candidates for the 2020 US presidential cycle drawing in $4.1 billion in donations. Once a campaign is over, there are rules in place that dictate how any leftover money can be spent.

One permitted use of excess campaign funds is to donate to other candidates. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules allow for a maximum donation of $2,000 to another federal candidate, and donations to state or local candidates are subject to state law. These donations can be made to a leadership PAC to back other candidates. However, critics argue that these PACs can be used as slush funds due to the few restrictions on their spending.

Designated contributions are those that are earmarked by the donor for a specific election. These count against the donor's contribution limits for that election. Undesignated contributions count against the donor's contribution limits for the candidate's next election. The FEC recommends that campaigns encourage contributors to designate their contributions for specific elections to ensure the donor's intent is clear.

In addition to donating to other candidates, excess campaign funds can be used for charitable donations, saving for a future campaign, or any other lawful purpose, as long as it is not for personal use. Personal use is defined as an expense that would exist for the individual irrespective of their role as a candidate or federal officeholder.

Saving for future campaigns is permitted

Political campaigns can be costly affairs, with candidates for the 2020 US presidential cycle drawing in $4.1 billion in donations. This money is often sourced from individual donors, corporations, political action committees (PACs), and sometimes the government. With such large sums of money involved, it is inevitable that there will be leftover funds after a campaign concludes.

In the case of excess political campaign contributions, there are rules in place that dictate how this money can be spent. One permitted use is saving it for future campaigns. This is a common practice, as it allows candidates to build a substantial war chest that can be utilized for subsequent electoral runs. However, it is important to note that there are regulations surrounding this practice. For example, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has guidelines that prohibit campaigns from retaining contributions that exceed certain limits. In the event that a campaign receives excessive contributions, they must follow special procedures to handle these funds appropriately.

The FEC also enforces laws that regulate campaign donations, spending, and public funding. These laws ensure that excess funds are not misused and that campaigns adhere to designated contribution limits for specific elections. This helps maintain transparency and fairness in the campaign financing process.

It is worth noting that the rules regarding excess campaign contributions can vary depending on the jurisdiction. For example, in New York City, the Campaign Finance Act stipulates that contribution and expenditure limits be adjusted every four years based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. This ensures that the regulations remain relevant and applicable over time.

By allowing candidates to save for future campaigns, they can better plan their electoral strategies and ensure they have the necessary financial resources to run competitive campaigns. This practice also encourages candidates to be prudent in their financial management, carefully allocating funds across multiple electoral cycles.

Explore related products

Buying the Vote: A History of Campaign Finance Reform

$23.87 $51

Analysis of Federal and state campaign finance law, summaries, and quick-reference charts

$25.99

Campaign Finance Reform Proposals of 1996: Hearings Before the Committee on Rules and Administration, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth ... of Senate Election Campaigns, S. 46, S. 1219

$50.5 $45.72

Campaign Finance Reform Proposals of 1996: Hearings Before the Committee on Rules and Administration, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congres

$28.4

When Money Speaks: The McCutcheon Decision, Campaign Finance Laws, and the First Amendment

$6.99 $19.99

Campaigns, Congress, and Courts: The Making of Federal Campaign Finance Law

$95

Personal use of excess funds is prohibited

Personal use of excess campaign funds is prohibited. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has rules in place to control how money is spent by campaign committees after a candidate bows out or an election is over. These rules apply to all types of contributions, except those made from a candidate's personal funds.

The FEC provides an irrespective test to differentiate between legitimate campaign expenses and personal expenses. According to this test, personal use is defined as "any use of campaign funds in a campaign account of a candidate (or former candidate) to fulfill a commitment, obligation, or expense of any person that would exist irrespective of the candidate's campaign or responsibilities as a federal officeholder."

Some examples of expenses that are considered personal use include salary payments to the candidate's family unless they provide a bona fide service to the campaign, and the payment reflects the market value of the service. Additionally, campaigns are prohibited from retaining contributions that exceed the limits set by the FEC. If a campaign receives excessive contributions, it must follow special procedures for handling such funds.

It is important to note that campaigns are also prohibited from accepting contributions from certain types of organizations and individuals, including corporations, labor organizations, and national banks. However, they can accept contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs) established by these entities. These PACs are subject to federal laws and regulations, and they must disclose the sources of their funds.

Excess funds can be used for moving expenses

Political campaigns can raise millions, if not billions, of dollars through personal and business donations. This money is used to pay for travel, administration, salaries, and other campaign-related expenses. However, once a campaign is over, there are often excess funds left over. So, what happens to these excess political campaign contributions?

There are rules in place that dictate how money can be spent after a campaign concludes. In the US, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has guidelines that control how money raised by candidate campaign committees is spent after a candidate bows out or after an election is officially over. Candidates are not allowed to use any remaining funds for personal use after all campaign-related debts are settled. Personal use is defined as "a commitment, obligation, or expense of any person that would exist irrespective of the candidate's campaign or responsibilities as a federal officeholder."

One permissible use of excess campaign funds is for moving expenses. A retiring federal officeholder may use campaign funds to pay for the expenses of moving office and personal furnishings from their congressional office in Washington, DC, back to their home state. While the costs of transporting an officeholder's personal household effects and furnishings from Washington, DC, to the officeholder's home state are not considered "winding down costs," such costs are considered a permissible use of campaign funds as "ordinary and necessary expenses" incurred in connection with ending their duties as a federal officeholder. All such moving expenses should be reported as "other disbursements" by the officeholder's committee, with specific payees and purposes noted.

In addition to moving expenses, other permissible uses of excess campaign funds include charitable donations, donations to other candidates, and saving it for a future campaign. Candidates may also choose to refund contributions to donors for moral, ethical, or legal reasons.

Frequently asked questions