Anti-Federalists' Constitution Ratification: Why Did They Support It?

The Anti-Federalists were a political movement that opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They were chiefly concerned with the concentration of power in the national government, arguing that it would threaten individual liberties. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, the Anti-Federalists included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. Their influence helped lead to the passage of the Bill of Rights, which protected Americans' civil liberties.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

Documents of Revolution: Common Sense, The Complete Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation, The Articles of Confederation, The U. S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights

$26.99 $26.99

The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Dispute: The Original Arguments For Each

$0.99 $25.13

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Anti-Federalists were concerned about the power of the national government

The Anti-Federalists were a diverse group of people who opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution. They were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of the states. They believed that the position of the president might evolve into a monarchy, threatening the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, and individuals. They also feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

The Anti-Federalists wanted a weak central government and strong state governments. They also wanted the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties. They believed that almost all the executive power should be left to the country's authorities.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. Their arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights, as the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped assuage its critics and ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified.

They wanted to protect individual liberties

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties. They were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of states. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. They wanted to protect individual liberties by ensuring strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. Their arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights. In response to the Anti-Federalists' demands, the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped assuage its critics and ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified.

James Madison, a Federalist at the time and the primary architect of the Constitution, introduced draft proposals of what would become the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution and advocated for their passage. In particular, the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution reinforced the reservation of the powers to the states or the people.

The Anti-Federalists also worried that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy.

They wanted to protect state governments

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they wanted to protect state governments. They were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of states. They feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. They wanted strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. Their influence helped lead to the passage of the Bill of Rights. The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution reinforced the reservation of the powers to the states or the people.

Explore related products

Mapping the Constitution: The Cartographic History of the Ratification of the Constitution

$25.07 $40

Original Intentions: On the Making and Ratification of the United States Constitution

$32.88

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

Slavery's Constitution: From Revolution to Ratification

$17.1 $19.99

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$79.05 $85

The Framing and Ratification of the Constitution

$69.99

They were against the position of president

The Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution. They were chiefly concerned with the position of the president, which was a novelty at the time, and feared that it might evolve into a monarchy. They were also worried that the new national government would be too powerful, threatening individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists were led by Patrick Henry of Virginia and included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. They wanted strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the ratification of the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights, which was designed to protect Americans' civil liberties. Their arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights, and the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped to assuage critics and ensure that the Constitution was successfully ratified.

The Anti-Federalists' concerns about the position of the president were not unfounded. The previous constitution, the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. However, the Federalists prevailed, and the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788 and went into effect in 1789.

They wanted to ensure the direct election of government officials

The Anti-Federalists were chiefly concerned with too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of states. They feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. They wanted to ensure the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The previous constitution, called the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, gave state governments more authority. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, Anti-Federalists worried, among other things, that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. The arguments of the Anti-Federalists influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights. As a response to the Anti-Federalists' demands of a bill of rights to guarantee specific liberties, the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped assuage its critics and ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified.

Frequently asked questions