Moral Diplomacy's Declaration: A New Era Of Us Foreign Policy

Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was a foreign policy approach that promoted democracy, peace, and freedom. It was based on the principle of self-determination, where people had the moral right to choose their government and leaders through democratic elections. Wilson's vision, outlined in his Fourteen Points speech to Congress after World War I, marked a shift from isolationism to internationalism. This policy was in contrast to the imperialist policies of his predecessors and Roosevelt's big stick policy of military force. Wilson believed that the US had a duty to spread democracy and used moral diplomacy as a tool to intervene in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America.

Explore related products

The Moralist: Woodrow Wilson and the World He Made

$18.38 $21

Woodrow Wilson

$14.43 $26

The Wisdom of Woodrow Wilson: Being Selections from His Thoughts and Comments on Political, Social a

$28.99

The Presidency of Woodrow Wilson (American Presidency Series)

$54.52 $99.99

In Face of the Facts: Moral Inquiry in American Scholarship (Woodrow Wilson Center Press)

$71.2 $120

The Collected Works of Woodrow Wilson: A Comprehensive Journey Through Politics, War, and American Ideals

$1.99 $28.1

Opposition to imperialism

Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was a response to the imperialism of several nations, especially in Latin America. Wilson believed that the US had a duty to spread democracy and curb the growth of imperialism. This was in direct opposition to the dollar diplomacy of William Howard Taft, which prioritised economic support to improve bilateral ties between nations. Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on economic power, and he frequently intervened in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America.

The opposition to imperialism has a long history, with early use of the term "anti-imperialist" occurring in the context of the Spanish-American War in 1898. The Anti-Imperialist League, founded on June 15, 1898, in Boston, opposed the American annexation of the Philippines, believing that imperialism violated the fundamental principle of "'consent of the governed'. The league included prominent citizens such as Andrew Carnegie, Henry James, William James, and Mark Twain. They argued that American imperialism would lead to militarism and the abandonment of American ideals of self-government and non-intervention.

In the 20th century, the Soviet Union positioned itself as the foremost enemy of imperialism, providing political and financial support to Third World revolutionary organisations fighting for national independence. However, anarchists and other Marxist organisations have criticised Soviet foreign policy as imperialism, arguing that Marxism would not eliminate imperialism.

Anti-imperialism within Britain emerged in the 1890s, particularly from within the Liberal Party. Economists had long been hostile to imperialism, seeing it as a violation of the principles of free trade. The Second Boer War (1899-1902) also sparked opposition, with groups like the South African Conciliation Committee forming to oppose British actions during the conflict.

Women also played a role in anti-imperialist movements, particularly during the Spanish-American War and subsequent American occupations. While some women supported imperialism, others actively opposed expansionist policies and worked to improve public health conditions in occupied territories.

Spread of democracy

Woodrow Wilson's "moral diplomacy" was a foreign policy approach that aimed to spread democracy, peace, and freedom worldwide. Wilson believed that the United States had a unique mission and responsibility to promote these ideals, drawing on the concept of American Exceptionalism. This marked a shift from the imperialist policies of his predecessors, which he sought to curb, particularly in Latin America.

At its core, moral diplomacy was rooted in the principle of self-determination, which Wilson described as "the moral right of people to choose their form of government and leaders by democratic elections." He saw it as a way to empower developing nations to become self-sustaining and democratic, rather than as a tool to extend American power. This approach was in contrast to Roosevelt's "big stick" policy of military force and Taft's "dollar diplomacy," which relied on economic support to improve bilateral ties.

Wilson frequently intervened in the affairs of other countries, especially in Latin America, to promote his vision of democracy. For example, in Haiti, American troops forced the Haitian legislature to choose Wilson's selected candidate as the Haitian president. He also refused to recognize Victoriano Huerta's control of Mexico in 1913 because he had illegally seized power, despite pressure from Americans with economic interests in the country and foreign powers who supported Huerta's open policies toward foreign investment.

Wilson's commitment to spreading democracy extended to the United States' own territories. For instance, he signed the Jones Act, which granted Puerto Rican citizens US citizenship and gave the territory partial legal independence. The Act also promised the Philippines full independence once a democratic government was established, although this was not realized until the 1940s.

Wilson's Fourteen Points speech, delivered to Congress after World War I, outlined his idealistic vision for the world centered on moral diplomacy. While these points were not immediately enacted in US foreign policy, they laid the groundwork for democratic nations to collaborate internationally and work towards shared goals. Wilson's belief in the spread of democracy and his interventionist approach to foreign policy solidified the United States' role as a global actor in international affairs.

Self-determination

Woodrow Wilson's moral diplomacy was underpinned by the principle of self-determination. This principle holds that people have the moral right to choose their form of government and leaders through democratic elections. It was a central tenet of Wilson's foreign policy and represented a departure from the imperialist policies of his predecessors.

Wilson believed that moral diplomacy was a means to empower developing nations to become self-sustaining and democratic. He saw it as a way to curb the growth of imperialism and spread democracy, particularly in Latin America. In his view, moral diplomacy was not about extending American power but about fostering peace and liberty worldwide. This belief in America's global mission to spread democracy and liberty stems from the concept of American Exceptionalism, which holds that the United States is uniquely positioned to guide the world toward justice and peace.

Wilson frequently intervened in the affairs of other countries to promote his vision of moral diplomacy. For example, in Haiti, American troops forced the Haitian legislature to choose Wilson's selected candidate as Haitian President. Similarly, in Nicaragua, the U.S. maintained troops throughout Wilson's administration and used them to influence the selection of the country's president. Wilson also refused to recognise Victoriano Huerta, who had illegally seized power in Mexico in 1913, despite pressure from American businesses with interests in the country.

Wilson's commitment to self-determination and moral diplomacy had a lasting impact on U.S. foreign policy. His Fourteen Points speech, delivered to Congress after World War I, outlined his vision for a world centred on moral diplomacy and the spread of democracy. While these points were not immediately enacted, they shifted U.S. foreign policy from isolationism to internationalism. Wilson's ideals eventually led to the United States joining the United Nations after World War II, solidifying its role as a global actor in international affairs with a belief in promoting democracy and liberty worldwide.

Explore related products

Woodrow Wilson and Harry Truman: Mission and Power in American Foreign Policy

$59.99 $95

Woodrow Wilson (1858 –1924). Evolution statt Revolution: Religiöse Moral, Liberalismus, idealistischer Internationalismus, Sachzwänge und Realpolitik (German Edition)

$17.35 $44.5

The New Freedom: A Call For the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People

$4.95 $9.99

Princeton for the Nation'S Service: an Address Delivered on the Occasion of His Inauguration as President of Princeton University on October Twenty-Fifth, Mcmii, by Woodrow (1903) [Leather Bound]

$11.45

Inside a U.S. Embassy: Diplomacy at Work, All-New Third Edition of the Essential Guide to the Foreign Service

$12.4 $22.95

America in the World: A History of U.S. Diplomacy and Foreign Policy

$16.96 $35

Internationalism

Woodrow Wilson's "moral diplomacy" was a significant shift from the previous administration's "dollar diplomacy", which emphasised economic support as a means to improve bilateral ties. Wilson's approach, in contrast, was based on economic power and the principle of self-determination, which held that people had the moral right to choose their own form of government and leaders through democratic elections. This marked a move from isolationism to internationalism.

Wilson's vision for moral diplomacy was deeply rooted in American exceptionalism, the belief that the United States had a unique mission to spread liberty and democracy worldwide. This idea can be traced back to Alexis de Tocqueville, who first described the United States as "exceptional" in the 19th century. Wilson's commitment to this ideology was evident in his 1914 address on "The Meaning of Liberty," where he positioned the United States as a beacon of liberty, justice, and peace for all mankind.

In practice, Wilson frequently intervened in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America. He believed that the United States had a duty to spread democracy and used aggressive moral diplomacy to achieve this goal. For example, in Haiti, American troops forced the Haitian legislature to choose Wilson's selected candidate as the Haitian president. Similarly, in Nicaragua, the United States maintained troops throughout Wilson's administration and used them to influence the selection of the country's president.

Wilson's moral diplomacy also extended to his foreign policy towards Mexico. When Victoriano Huerta gained control of Mexico in 1913 through illegal means, Wilson refused to recognise him, despite pressure from American citizens with economic interests in the country and support for Huerta from foreign powers. Wilson's stance on Mexico demonstrated his commitment to moral diplomacy and his opposition to recognising leaders who had not come to power through democratic processes.

The impact of Wilson's moral diplomacy was far-reaching. It laid the groundwork for democratic nations to collaborate and work towards common goals, eventually leading to the United States' participation in international organisations like the United Nations following World War II. While critics viewed Wilson's project as the pinnacle of American Exceptionalism, his ideas cemented the United States as a significant player in global affairs, with a belief in American morality as its driving force.

Human rights

Woodrow Wilson's "moral diplomacy" was a foreign policy approach that focused on promoting democratic ideals and moral principles in international relations. Wilson's moral diplomacy was based on the belief that the United States should only intervene in foreign affairs when a moral imperative justified such actions. This represented a shift from the imperialist policies of his predecessors, which were driven by selfish materialism and national interests.

At the core of Wilson's moral diplomacy was the principle of self-determination, which he described as "the moral right of people to choose their form of government and leaders by democratic elections". This principle was applied to nations such as the Philippines, which was under the control of the United States at the time. Wilson signed the Jones Act, granting Puerto Rican citizens US citizenship and partial legal independence, and promising full independence to the Philippines once a democratic government was established.

In his 1914 address on "The Meaning of Liberty", Wilson alluded to America's potential to be a guiding light for future generations, leading the way towards justice, liberty, and peace. He frequently intervened in the affairs of other countries, particularly in Latin America, to spread democracy and uphold his moral values. This included interventions in Mexico, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Cuba, and Panama.

However, Wilson's moral diplomacy had its shortcomings. It led to increased direct military action in many countries and manipulation of situations in non-democratic countries or those with values that Wilson considered morally corrupt. Additionally, while Wilson advocated for human rights and non-interference in the internal affairs of other nations, his actions in Haiti, where he forced the Haitian legislature to choose his selected candidate as president, contradict these ideals.

In the context of World War I, Wilson initially maintained neutrality, but shifted his stance due to Germany's aggressive actions, such as submarine warfare that threatened American trade and lives. He framed US involvement in the war as a moral necessity, emphasizing the goal of ending militarism and making the world "safe for democracy". Wilson's Fourteen Points and advocacy for the League of Nations, an international organization aimed at preventing future conflicts, further demonstrated his commitment to moral diplomacy in the post-war era.

Frequently asked questions