Congress's Delegated Powers: Understanding Constitutional Authority

The delegation of powers to Congress by the US Constitution is a complex and multifaceted topic, with a range of factors influencing the extent and limits of their legislative authority. The first article of the Constitution outlines the legislative powers vested in Congress, including the authority to make laws and regulate taxation. However, the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the US government is a key principle that constrains Congress's ability to delegate its powers. While Congress generally cannot delegate its powers to other branches, there are exceptions, such as in foreign affairs and when granting authority to administrative agencies. The Supreme Court has played a significant role in interpreting and shaping the boundaries of Congress's delegated powers, with cases like J. W. Hampton, Jr. & Co. v. United States and Loving v. United States providing important insights into the application and limitations of these powers.

Explore related products

The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumeration and Federal Power

$42.83 $49.95

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

Contested Ground: How to Understand the Limits of Presidential Power

$26.49 $26.95

Trajectory of Power: The Rise of the Strongman Presidency

$35 $35

Enforcing the Equal Protection Clause: Congressional Power, Judicial Doctrine, and Constitutional Law

$65 $72

The Constitution of Conflict: How the Supreme Court Undermines the Separation of Powers (Constitutional Thinking)

$52.24 $54.99

Separation of powers

The US Constitution's first article outlines the delegated powers granted to Congress. It consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives, with the latter being composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the various states. The Constitution grants Congress the authority to make laws necessary for executing the powers vested in the US government. This includes the power to regulate taxation, such as imposing taxes on the importation of persons or goods.

The Constitution also addresses the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the US government. This principle prevents the lawmaking branch from entirely divesting itself of power and transferring it to another branch. However, it does not prohibit the conferral of significant authority on the executive branch. The Supreme Court has affirmed that the legislative branch can, in certain situations, delegate some of its power to administrative agencies.

The delegation of powers has been a subject of debate in various court cases. In J.W. Hampton, Jr. & Co. v. United States, Chief Justice Taft discussed the ability of Congress to delegate power, emphasising the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. In Loving v. United States, the Court distinguished between its usual separation-of-powers doctrine and the delegation doctrine, which focuses on the provision of standards rather than power arrogation and impairment.

The delegation of powers in foreign affairs has also been addressed in cases such as United States v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation. The Court upheld Congress's joint resolution prohibiting the sale of arms to certain warring countries based on the President's findings. This highlighted a distinction in the standard of delegation applied when the President shares power in areas of foreign relations.

In summary, the US Constitution grants Congress legislative powers while upholding the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The delegation of powers by Congress has been a subject of judicial interpretation, with a focus on maintaining the balance of power between the branches and providing clear standards for the exercise of delegated authority.

Due process

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law". This was ratified in 1868, and it echoes the Fifth Amendment, which applies only to the federal government. The Fourteenth Amendment was adopted after the Civil War to protect individual rights from interference by the states.

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to impose on the states many of the Bill of Rights' limitations. This is known as incorporation against the states through the Due Process Clause. The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause guarantees procedural due process, meaning that government actors must follow certain procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property.

The Supreme Court has also interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause to protect substantive due process, holding that there are certain fundamental rights that the government cannot infringe upon, even if it provides procedural protections. For example, the Court has applied the Clause to protect the right to marry, the right to use contraception, and the right to abortion.

The concept of due process is also relevant to the delegation of powers. Under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, Congress can only delegate its powers in certain circumstances. The separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the U.S. government is a founding principle, and generally, the different branches cannot delegate their powers to each other. However, the Supreme Court has held that in some situations, the legislative branch can grant some of its power to administrative agencies.

The Supreme Court has also distinguished between its usual separation-of-powers doctrine and the delegation doctrine, which is informed by the provision of standards rather than the arrogation and impairment analyses. The delegation doctrine is unmoored from traditional separation-of-powers principles. Due process is one of the constitutional requirements of delegation, which can be fulfilled through the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Congressional standards

The US Constitution's first article outlines the legislative powers vested in Congress, which consists of a Senate and House of Representatives. The Constitution grants Congress the authority to make laws necessary for executing its powers and those vested in the US government. This includes the power to regulate interstate commerce, levy taxes, and impeach officials.

Congress's ability to delegate its powers is constrained by the Constitution and court interpretations. The separation of powers and due process are two key principles that guide this process. While a rigid interpretation of separation of powers prevents Congress from transferring its legislative authority to other branches, it doesn't preclude significant authority delegation to the executive branch.

The Supreme Court has affirmed that the legislative branch can, in certain situations, delegate some of its powers to administrative agencies. This delegation is permissible when Congress provides clear standards and guidelines for the agencies to follow. For example, Congress can delegate authority to the President in foreign affairs, as seen in the United States v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation case, where Congress made it unlawful to sell arms to certain warring countries based on the President's findings.

Explore related products

Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the President

$24.99 $34.99

War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority

$28.99 $31

Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial: Congressional Lawsuits and the Separation of Powers

$24.99 $36.95

Requiring Individuals to Obtain Health Insurance: A Constitutional Analysis: Congressional Research Service, April 6, 2012

$9.99 $9.99

The Power of Separation

$53.58 $55

Congress’s Power Over Appropriations: Constitutional and Statutory Provisions

$9.1

Administrative agencies

The US Constitution's separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches is a founding principle of the nation's government. Generally, the different branches cannot delegate their powers to each other. However, the Supreme Court has ruled that the legislative branch can, in some cases, grant some of its power to administrative agencies.

The judicial branch, for instance, includes agencies that assist the federal courts in carrying out their duties. The Federal Judicial Center, established by Congress in the 1960s, serves as the federal courts' education and research arm. The Administrative Office of the US Courts, which handles the non-judicial administrative work of the federal courts, such as maintaining statistics and managing budgets, is another example.

Congress may also establish legislative agencies to help it carry out its responsibilities more effectively. These agencies are part of the legislative branch and have a wide range of functions, from providing advice and resources to Congress to maintaining its physical facilities and protecting the safety and rights of legislative branch employees. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), for example, is in charge of producing independent economic and budgetary analyses to help Congress. The CBO offers objective, non-partisan economic support, including cost estimates for legislators to incorporate into proposed bills and to forecast funding availability for existing programs in future years. Other key legislative agencies include the Government Publishing Office (GPO), the Architect of the Capitol, and the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights.

The Library of Congress, the US government's oldest cultural institution, is another well-known legislative agency. It acts as Congress's primary research hub and houses the world's most extensive library, with millions of photographs, books, maps, manuscripts, and recordings.

The executive branch also includes several independent agencies. The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), for example, is an independent federal agency dedicated to improving federal agency administrative processes and procedures. The US Agency for International Development (USAID) is the principal US agency for providing assistance to countries recovering from disasters, fighting poverty, and implementing democratic reforms. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) protects people from harmful chemical exposures.

Foreign affairs

The US Constitution contains ambiguities regarding the roles of Congress and the President in making foreign policy. The debate over foreign policy powers arises from the language of the Constitution, which gives the President the power to make treaties, nominate ambassadors and executive department leaders, and appoint public ministers and consuls, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The President also acts as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and has the duty to receive foreign ambassadors and other public ministers.

However, Congress also has foreign relations powers, including the power to approve treaties. The Senate's role in the ratification of treaties and approval of ambassadorial nominations and high-ranking executive branch officials is explicitly outlined in the Constitution. Other sources of congressional power in foreign policymaking include the responsibility for appropriating all government monies, including foreign assistance; the power to declare war under Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution; and the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations.

Congress has used these powers to claim the right to limit or guide the President's foreign policy and, on occasion, has tried to initiate its own policies. For example, in the case of the Trump administration's curtailment of the US Agency of International Development (USAID)'s funding, the Justice Department asserted that such actions fall under the foreign affairs powers granted to the President by the Constitution. In contrast, the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Commission argued that the funding decisions were an "unconstitutional exercise of presidential power."

The scope of the President's foreign affairs powers has been a topic of debate since the 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, where delegates discussed the nature of the executive branch. While the President's powers are outlined in Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has also played a role in interpreting and defining these powers. In the 1936 case United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation, the Court upheld a joint resolution of Congress making it unlawful to sell arms to certain warring countries upon certain findings by the President. However, Justice Sutherland proclaimed that the President has more flexibility in foreign affairs and can make decisions not specifically authorized by Congress.

In summary, while the US Constitution grants foreign affairs powers to both Congress and the President, there is ambiguity regarding their respective roles in making foreign policy. Congress has certain explicit powers, such as the ratification of treaties and the appropriation of government monies, while the President has the power to make treaties and appoint ambassadors, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Supreme Court has also played a role in interpreting and defining the scope of the President's foreign affairs powers.

Frequently asked questions