
Richard Jewell was an American security guard and law enforcement officer who, in 1996, discovered a backpack containing three pipe bombs in Atlanta's Centennial Olympic Park and helped evacuate the area before the bomb exploded, saving many people from injury or death. Jewell was initially lauded as a hero by the media, but three days later, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution revealed that the FBI was treating him as a possible suspect. For the next several weeks, the news media focused aggressively on Jewell as the presumed culprit. Jewell was never charged, but he experienced a trial by media, which took a toll on his personal and professional life. He eventually sued several news outlets, including ABC, CNN, NBC, the New York Post, and Cox Enterprises, the owner of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Did Richard Jewell sue the Atlanta Journal-Constitution? | No, but he did sue several news outlets, including ABC, CNN, NBC, the New York Post, and Cox Enterprises, the owner of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. |
| Reason for suing Cox Enterprises | Richard Jewell sued Cox Enterprises for its media coverage of the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing and his involvement, where he was initially portrayed as a hero but later became a suspect under FBI investigation. |
| Outcome of the case against Cox Enterprises | The case was settled out of court. |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

Richard Jewell sued several news outlets
Jewell's lawsuits focused on vindicating his reputation rather than financial gain. He argued that he had been defamed and challenged a trial court decision labelling him as a limited-purpose public figure. The media outlets, in turn, contested the trial court's denial of motions for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution specifically faced legal challenges in disclosing confidential sources related to their coverage of Jewell. Jewell sought the identities of the newspaper's confidential sources, but the newspaper refused, arguing that these communications were privileged and protected by the First Amendment. The Court of Appeals of Georgia vacated the trial court's orders requiring disclosure of the confidential sources and remanded the case for further proceedings. The court affirmed that Jewell was a limited-purpose public figure due to his voluntary engagement with the media and public discourse following the bombing, which required him to prove actual malice in his defamation claim.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution also played a significant role in the initial media coverage of the Olympic Park bombing, portraying Jewell as a hero for his role in discovering the bomb and evacuating bystanders. However, when the FBI focused its investigation on Jewell, the media coverage shifted, and he became a suspect. The newspaper published an extra edition with the headline "FBI Suspects 'Hero' May Have Planted Bomb," which was based on a tip from an FBI source.
Who Leads the Legislative Branch?
You may want to see also

Jewell's lawsuit against the Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Richard Jewell was an American security guard and law enforcement officer who, during the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia, discovered a backpack containing bombs in Centennial Olympic Park. He helped evacuate the area before the bomb exploded, saving many people from injury or death. Initially hailed as a hero by the media, Jewell was soon considered a suspect by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) based on psychological profiling. Though never charged, Jewell experienced a "trial by media", which took a toll on his personal and professional life.
In the media coverage that followed, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) revealed that the FBI was treating Jewell as a possible suspect, describing him as a "person of interest" and a "failed law enforcement officer". The newspaper also reported that Jewell fitted the "lone bomber" profile and could have planted the bomb so he could "find" it and be a hero.
Jewell filed a defamation lawsuit against the AJC, arguing that the newspaper had a duty to investigate whether the information it received from law enforcement was true. He sought the identities of the AJC's confidential sources, which the newspaper argued were privileged and protected by the First Amendment. The trial court attempted to balance Jewell's need for the information against the AJC's desire to maintain the confidentiality of its informants. However, the Court of Appeals of Georgia vacated the trial court's orders requiring disclosure of the confidential sources, affirming that Jewell was a limited-purpose public figure due to his voluntary engagement with the media and public discourse following the bombing. This required him to prove actual malice in his defamation claim.
The AJC faced legal challenges in disclosing confidential sources related to their coverage of Jewell, and the newspaper, in turn, contested the trial court's denial of motions for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment. The appellate court affirmed Jewell's status as a public figure and dismissed the newspaper's appeal on their motions due to the lack of a trial court ruling.
Celebrating Constitution Day: Understanding America's Historical Foundation
You may want to see also

Jewell's status as a limited-purpose public figure
Richard Jewell was deemed a limited-purpose public figure by the Court of Appeals of Georgia, which had a significant impact on his defamation lawsuit against the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. This designation was based on Jewell's voluntary engagement with the media and public discourse following the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing.
Jewell, an American security guard and law enforcement officer, played a crucial role in the bombing incident by alerting the police and facilitating the evacuation of the area before the bomb exploded, saving numerous lives. Initially hailed as a hero by the media, Jewell's image took a drastic turn as he soon became a suspect in the eyes of the FBI and the public.
The determination of Jewell's status as a limited-purpose public figure carried significant legal implications. This classification meant that Jewell had to meet a higher threshold of proof in his defamation claim against the newspaper. Specifically, he had to demonstrate "actual malice," indicating that the newspaper knowingly published false information or displayed a reckless disregard for the truth. This burden of proof is substantially more challenging than that faced by a private figure in similar circumstances.
The court's decision to classify Jewell as a limited-purpose public figure was influenced by his active participation in the public discourse surrounding the bombing. Jewell granted 11 interviews in the four days following the incident, before he was identified as a suspect. By engaging with the media, Jewell voluntarily entered a public controversy and, as a result, the court determined that he should have anticipated scrutiny and the potential for misstatements by the press.
The distinction between a general public figure and a limited-purpose public figure is important to note. A limited-purpose public figure is an individual who becomes prominent within a specific context or area of controversy. In Jewell's case, his prominence was directly linked to his involvement in the Centennial Olympic Park bombing and the subsequent media coverage. This classification had a direct impact on the legal standards and burden of proof required for his defamation claim against the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Hamilton's Influence: Shaping the US Constitution
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$17.79 $21

The newspaper's refusal to disclose confidential sources
Richard Jewell was an American security guard and law enforcement officer who, in 1996, discovered a backpack containing pipe bombs in Atlanta's Centennial Olympic Park. He helped evacuate the area, saving many people from injury or death. Jewell was initially hailed as a hero by the media, but soon the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) considered him a suspect based on psychological profiling. Jewell was never charged, but the media frenzy took a toll on his personal and professional life.
Jewell sued several news outlets, including ABC, CNN, NBC, the New York Post, and Cox Enterprises, the owner of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC). He claimed that these outlets had defamed him by portraying him as guilty of the bombing and by describing him as a "badge-wearing zealot" and a "person of interest" with a "bizarre employment history". All of these cases were settled out of court, with NBC settling for $500,000, and Jewell also receiving settlements from CNN and ABC.
The AJC fought back against Jewell's lawsuit and refused to retract their story. The newspaper argued that its communications with confidential sources were privileged and protected by the First Amendment. The case, "Atlanta Journal-Constitution v. Jewell", centred on whether the AJC was required to disclose its confidential sources and whether Jewell was a limited-purpose public figure in his defamation action.
The Court of Appeals of Georgia vacated the trial court's orders requiring disclosure of the confidential sources, finding that the trial court had not properly balanced the interests involved. The court affirmed that Jewell was a limited-purpose public figure due to his voluntary engagement with the media and public discourse following the bombing. This required him to prove actual malice in his defamation claim. The court also dismissed the newspaper's appeal on their motions due to a lack of a trial court ruling.
The refusal of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution to disclose its confidential sources highlights the complex legal issues surrounding journalistic confidentiality and the protection of sources. While there is no constitutional or statutory privilege protecting the sources in this case, the court recognised the strong public policy considerations in favour of allowing journalists to protect their sources. This case underscores the importance of balancing the interests of individuals, like Jewell, seeking redress for defamation, and the public interest in maintaining journalistic confidentiality.
Understanding California's Hostile Work Environment Laws
You may want to see also

Jewell's portrayal as a wannabe cop and lone bomber
Richard Jewell was an American security guard and law enforcement officer who, during the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia, discovered a backpack containing three pipe bombs in Centennial Olympic Park. He alerted the authorities and helped to evacuate the area before the bomb exploded, saving many people from injury or death.
Jewell was initially hailed as a hero by the media, but three days later, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution revealed that the FBI was treating him as a possible suspect, based largely on a "lone bomber" criminal profile. For the next several weeks, the news media focused aggressively on him as the presumed culprit, describing him as a "person of interest". The media described Jewell as a failed law enforcement officer who might have planted the bomb so he could "find" it and be a hero. The New York Times reported in October 1996, when he was cleared as a suspect, that "a number of law-enforcement officials had said privately for months that they thought Mr. Jewell had been involved in the bombing, even though there was no evidence against him and some evidence seemed to rule him out".
Jewell was never charged, but he experienced what was described as a "trial by media", which took a toll on his personal and professional life. He was accused of overstepping his authority in law enforcement and security jobs and was described as a "wannabe cop" and a "badge-wearing zealot" who "would write epic police reports for minor infractions". In 2006, Jewell stated that the lawsuits he filed were focused on vindicating his reputation rather than financial gain.
The 2019 film "Richard Jewell", directed by Clint Eastwood, depicts the events surrounding the case and shows how the FBI zeroed in on Jewell because they felt he fit the profile of a police wannabe craving hero status. The film's screenwriter, Billy Ray, accused the Atlanta Journal-Constitution of using a disputed scene to cloak its role in ruining Jewell's life. Ray said, "They profiled Richard Jewell as a wannabe cop and lone bomber, but they did so in the 'voice of God,' without quoting anyone—thereby stating their assumptions as facts".
Mexico's Constitutional Reform: Post-Spanish Revolution Era
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Yes, Richard Jewell sued the Atlanta Journal-Constitution for defamation, arguing that the newspaper libelled him in a series of false and defamatory articles.
The case was settled out of court.
The main issues were whether the Atlanta Journal-Constitution was required to disclose its confidential sources and whether Richard Jewell was a limited-purpose public figure.
The case highlighted the importance of responsible and accurate reporting, especially when dealing with sensitive information that can impact an individual's reputation and life.
Yes, Richard Jewell also sued several other news outlets, including ABC, CNN, NBC, the New York Post, and Cox Enterprises, the owner of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.








![Libel [Remaster] by Olivia De Havilland](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51c+x95mOML._AC_UY218_.jpg)
![Libel [Remaster] by MGM](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51Xv6OSejyL._AC_UY218_.jpg)





![Sued for Libel [ NON-USA FORMAT, PAL, Reg.0 Import - Spain ]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41skWUqBvhL._AC_UY218_.jpg)

