America's Constitutional Crisis: Democracy On The Brink

In early 2025, some politicians and commentators argued that the US was facing a constitutional crisis. This was attributed to the Trump administration's attempts to shut down agencies without congressional authorization, refusal to spend money as appropriated by Congress, and defiance of court orders. However, other legal experts cautioned against hastily employing the phrase constitutional crisis, suggesting that it requires a situation where the Constitution is not equipped to provide a resolution. While the US faces challenges to the rule of law and constitutional norms, it is important to carefully consider the specific circumstances and the potential for resolution within the existing democratic framework.

Explore related products

Constitutional Democracy in Crisis?

$46.81 $61

The Federalist Papers* and the Current Constitutional Crisis: *Abridged and Annotated for 21st Century Readers

$9.99 $9.99

Sedition: How America's Constitutional Order Emerged from Violent Crisis

$26.9 $32

The Legal Basis for a Moral Constitution: A Guide for Christians to Understand America's Constitutional Crisis

$5.99 $19.95

Constitutional Dictatorship - Crisis Government in the Modern Democracies

$9.99 $35.99

Crisis of the Two Constitutions: The Rise, Decline, and Recovery of American Greatness

$21.12 $34.99

Trump's second term

Some sources suggest that the US is in a constitutional crisis, or at least close to one, during Trump's second term. This is due to Trump's attempts to shut down agencies without congressional authorization, refusal to spend money as appropriated by Congress, and defiance of court orders. Trump's actions have been challenged in the courts, with federal judges blocking his attempts to rescind birthright citizenship.

IU Political Science professors predict that Trump will follow through on some of his promises during his second term, while others will remain unfulfilled. They predict that Trump's Department of Education will restrict academic freedom, and his Energy Department will prioritise the petroleum industry over concerns about global warming. They also predict that Trump's administration will be chaotic, with political opposition and legal challenges limiting or overturning some of his measures.

Despite these concerns, some experts argue that the US is not in a constitutional crisis, and that it will take the cooperation of all branches of government to prevent one. They caution against putting too much faith in the courts alone to resolve potential crises.

Looking forward, predictions for Trump's second term include the possibility of a severe constitutional crisis, a recession, and further attempts to reduce immigration and build a wall. While these predictions are probabilistic, they provide insight into potential risks and outcomes during Trump's second term.

Presidential power

The United States Constitution is supposed to provide a framework for resolving disputes through doctrines such as the separation of powers. A constitutional crisis occurs when the system of "checks and balances" breaks down without clear recourse, rendering the institutions incapable of resolving the dispute.

A constitutional crisis can lead to administrative paralysis and the eventual collapse of the government, the loss of political legitimacy, democratic backsliding, or civil war. Crises may arise from conflicts between different branches of government, conflicts between central and local governments, or conflicts among various factions within society.

In the course of government, a constitutional crisis results when one or more of the parties to a political dispute willfully chooses to violate a law of the constitution or to dispute the judicial interpretation of a constitutional law.

Some politicians and commentators have argued that actions taken by the administration of President Donald Trump have created a constitutional crisis, including attempts to shut down agencies such as USAID without congressional authorization, to refuse to spend money in ways appropriated by Congress, and to defy court orders. Trump has also threatened to impeach judges that go against his orders.

Trump's second term in office has seen a far more aggressive assault on American governance, with attempts to roll back birthright citizenship, freeze federal spending, and shut down government agencies. These actions have been challenged and blocked in courts, with judges calling them "blatantly unconstitutional".

However, some experts argue that the U.S. is not in a constitutional crisis, but rather that the phrase "constitutional crisis" is being used too casually, and that it will take the cooperation of all branches of government to avoid one.

Congress and the Supreme Court

While some commentators have argued that the United States is in a constitutional crisis, others disagree.

A constitutional crisis can lead to administrative paralysis, the collapse of the government, the loss of political legitimacy, democratic backsliding, or civil war. It occurs when the system of "checks and balances" breaks down, rendering institutions incapable of resolving a dispute.

Some sources point to the Trump administration's attempts to shut down agencies without congressional authorization, refusal to spend money as appropriated by Congress, and defiance of court orders as evidence of a constitutional crisis.

However, constitutional law scholar Jeannie Suk Gersen cautions against hastily declaring a constitutional crisis, arguing that doing so could foster confrontation. Gersen suggests that phrases like "constitutional crisis" should not be used without sufficient knowledge of the law and facts involved in various cases.

Another perspective is that a constitutional crisis will only occur if all branches of the government fail to cooperate. So far, Congress has mostly acquiesced to the administration, and the courts have begun to weigh in.

The role of Congress and the Supreme Court is crucial in preventing a constitutional crisis. Congress, as the national legislative assembly, must function as a coequal branch of government for constitutional governance to work effectively. The Supreme Court, on the other hand, plays a vital role in ensuring adherence to the rule of law and interpreting constitutional laws.

In the context of the Trump administration, the Supreme Court has faced the challenge of navigating conflicts between the executive branch and other institutions. The Court's rulings on issues like birthright citizenship and presidential power have been pivotal in shaping the political landscape.

In conclusion, while the United States faces significant challenges and there are concerns about a potential constitutional crisis, the role of Congress and the Supreme Court is critical in maintaining the balance of power and upholding the Constitution. Their cooperation and adherence to constitutional principles are key to preventing a full-blown constitutional crisis.

Explore related products

POWERS OF THE PRESIDENT DURING CRISES: Constitutional Limits, Executive Decisions, and the Battle for Balance in Times of National Emergency

$22.99 $22.99

The United States of Dysfunction: A Constitutional History of America’s Present Crisis

$15.95 $15.95

Crisis and Command: A History of Executive Power from George Washington to George W. Bush

$38.97

Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism

$33.2 $34.95

Contesting the Constitution: Congress Debates the Missouri Crisis, 1819-1821 (Studies in Constitutional Democracy)

$43 $43

Religious Liberty in Crisis: Exercising Your Faith in an Age of Uncertainty

$4.16 $26.99

Civil war

The United States has faced several constitutional crises in its history, with some scholars arguing that the country is currently in the midst of another. While the definition of a constitutional crisis is contested, it generally refers to a situation where a political dispute cannot be resolved within the existing rules, norms, and procedures that govern society. This often occurs when there is a breakdown of the system of checks and balances, leading to administrative paralysis, democratic backsliding, or even civil war.

The American Civil War is often cited as a significant constitutional crisis in US history. The conflict was preceded by a long-brewing crisis over slavery and states' rights, which ultimately led to the secession of eleven southern slaveholding states from the federal union. The Nullification Crisis of 1828-1832, when South Carolina declared the Tariff of 1828 and 1832 unconstitutional and initiated military preparations to resist federal enforcement, is also viewed as a precursor to the Civil War.

The election of Abraham Lincoln, who intended to prohibit slavery in western territories, further escalated tensions. Lincoln refused to recognize the secessions and worked to restore the states to the union by force, ultimately concluding the Civil War. The conflict resulted in the loss of political legitimacy and a democratic backslide, as white supremacists in the South deprived African Americans of their civil and political rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments.

In addition to the Civil War, there have been other instances of constitutional crises in the US. For example, in 1832, President Andrew Jackson refused to follow the Supreme Court ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, which recognized Cherokee sovereignty above Georgia state law. More recently, during the Trump administration, there were concerns about potential constitutional crises due to Trump's policies, impeachment hearings, and his alleged campaign to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

While the full implications of the current situation are yet to be seen, the potential for a constitutional crisis in the US remains a concern for many scholars and observers.

Democracy

The concept of a constitutional crisis generally describes a situation in which a political dispute cannot be resolved within the system of rules, norms, and procedures that govern society. A crisis can range from minor to requiring a new constitution. Constitutional crises can arise from conflicts between different branches of government, conflicts between central and local governments, or conflicts among various factions within society.

In the United States, some have argued that a constitutional crisis is close or already underway, particularly in relation to the Trump administration. Trump has allegedly taken several actions that threaten democracy and the rule of law, including attempts to shut down agencies without congressional authorization, refusing to spend money as appropriated by Congress, defying court orders, and threatening to impeach judges that go against his orders. Trump has also sought to end birthright citizenship, which has been blocked by federal judges.

Some legal scholars and experts, however, caution against hastily declaring a constitutional crisis. They argue that the U.S. Constitution provides a framework for resolving disputes through doctrines such as the separation of powers and checks and balances. While there may be challenges and disagreements, the system is designed to handle conflicts and ensure democratic governance.

To prevent a full-blown constitutional crisis, it is crucial for all branches of the government to cooperate and uphold the rule of law. Elected representatives and individual citizens play a vital role in safeguarding democracy and ensuring that governmental institutions remain accountable.

Frequently asked questions