The Mcculloch V. Maryland Constitutional Clause Reference

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of Federal power and commerce. The case involved the power of Congress to charter a bank, sparking a broader issue of the division of powers between state and Federal Government. The case referenced the Necessary and Proper Clause, which gave Congress the power to establish a national bank, and the Supremacy Clause, which makes federal laws supreme to state laws. The case also presented the question of whether the Federal Government holds sovereign power over states.

Explore related products

The Contract Clause: A Constitutional History

$31.04 $59.99

The U.S. Constitution: Explained--Clause by Clause--for Every American Today

$9.97 $12

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$241.98 $359

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

The Establishment Clause: Religion and the First Amendment

$29.99

Great Cases in Constitutional Law

$44 $47

Necessary and Proper Clause

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a landmark US Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of Federal power and commerce. The case involved the power of Congress to charter a bank, which sparked the broader issue of the division of powers between states and the Federal Government.

The case centred on the Second Bank of the United States, established by Congress in 1816. In 1818, the State of Maryland approved legislation to impose taxes on the bank, which was chartered by Congress. James W. McCulloch, a federal cashier at the Baltimore branch, refused to pay the taxes imposed by the state, resulting in a lawsuit. The state argued that the Second Bank was unconstitutional because the Constitution did not provide a textual commitment for the federal government to charter a bank.

The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled in favour of McCulloch and the Federal Government. The Court held that Congress had the authority to create a national bank and that the states did not have the power to tax or otherwise interfere with any constitutional means by which the federal government exercised its authority. This decision was based on the interpretation of express congressional powers taken together with the Necessary and Proper Clause.

The Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, is found in Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution. It grants Congress the authority to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution" the work of the Federal Government. In other words, it allows Congress to pass all laws necessary to effectively pursue its specified ends.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Court rejected a narrow interpretation of "necessary" as limiting Congress's powers to those absolutely necessary for the exercise of an enumerated federal power. Instead, it was argued that the word "necessary" should be interpreted as "needful", "requisite", "essential", or "conducive to", allowing for a broader range of powers. This interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause was pivotal in the Court's decision, as it affirmed the supremacy of federal power over state law.

Implied powers

McCulloch v. Maryland >(1819) is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of federal power and commerce. It is one of the first and most important cases on federal power, involving the power of Congress to charter a bank and sparking the broader issue of the division of powers between states and the federal government.

The case centred on the Second Bank of the United States, established by Congress in 1816. A year later, the Bank opened a branch in Baltimore, Maryland, where it carried out normal banking operations. In 1818, the Maryland legislature voted to impose a tax on all banks within the state that were not chartered by the state legislature. The Second Bank refused to comply, resulting in a lawsuit against its head, James William McCulloch.

The state of Maryland successfully argued on appeal that the Second Bank was unconstitutional because the Constitution did not explicitly grant the federal government the power to charter a bank. Maryland asserted its sovereign power to tax any business within its borders.

However, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled in favour of the federal government. Marshall's decision affirmed that Congress had implied powers derived from those listed in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. The "Necessary and Proper" Clause, also known as the "elastic clause", granted Congress the authority to "`make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution`" the work of the federal government.

The Court held that the federal government had the right and power to establish a national bank and that states did not have the authority to tax or otherwise interfere with constitutional means by which the federal government exercised its powers. Marshall famously concluded, "the power to tax involves the power to destroy."

The McCulloch v. Maryland case set a significant precedent regarding the expansion of federal power and the interpretation of implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause.

Federal power

The McCulloch v. Maryland case of 1819 is considered a landmark Supreme Court case that significantly expanded federal power. It addressed the issue of federal power and commerce, specifically concerning the power of Congress to charter a bank. This case sparked an even broader issue of the division of powers between states and the federal government.

The case centred around the Second Bank of the United States, established by Congress in 1816. In 1817, the bank opened a branch in Baltimore, Maryland, carrying out normal banking operations. However, in 1818, the Maryland legislature voted to impose a tax on all banks within the state that were not chartered by the state legislature. The Second Bank of the United States refused to comply, resulting in a lawsuit against its head, James William McCulloch.

Maryland argued that as a sovereign state, it had the power to tax any business within its borders. On the other hand, McCulloch's attorneys argued that establishing a national bank was "necessary and proper" for Congress to carry out its powers effectively. Chief Justice John Marshall played a pivotal role in the case, ruling in favour of the federal government. He asserted that Congress had the implied power to create a federal bank and that states did not have the authority to tax or interfere with the federal government's constitutional means of executing its powers.

The McCulloch v. Maryland case established several important principles regarding federal power. Firstly, it affirmed the concept of implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause (also known as the Elastic Clause), where Congress could make all laws "necessary and proper" for executing its powers. Secondly, it emphasised the supremacy of federal laws over state laws, as per the Supremacy Clause, prohibiting states from enacting laws contrary to federal legislation. This case set a precedent for the expansion of federal power and the interpretation of constitutional clauses in favour of broader federal authority.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$143.44 $180

Equal Citizenship, Civil Rights, and the Constitution: The Original Sense of the Privileges or Immunities Clause (Routledge Research in Constitutional Law)

$55.16 $72.99

The Odd Clauses: Understanding the Constitution Through Ten of Its Most Curious Provisions

$13.99 $18

The Supremacy Clause: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Reference Guides to the United States Constitution)

$95

Fighting Foreclosure: The Blaisdell Case, the Contract Clause, and the Great Depression (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$17.44 $29.99

The Presidential Pardon: The Short Clause with a Long, Troubled History

$22.95 $22.95

Sovereign power

The landmark Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) addressed the issue of federal power and commerce, specifically concerning the power of Congress to charter a bank. This case sparked the broader issue of the division of powers between states and the federal government, posing the question: does the Federal Government hold sovereign power over states?

The case involved James William McCulloch, a Federal cashier at the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States, which was established by Congress in 1816. In 1818, the State of Maryland approved legislation to impose a tax on this bank, which McCulloch refused to pay, resulting in a lawsuit against him. Maryland argued that as a sovereign state, it had the power to tax any business within its borders.

The Supreme Court, however, ruled in favor of McCulloch and the Federal Government, concluding that the Federal Government had the right and power to set up a Federal bank and that states did not have the power to tax the Federal Government. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote:

> "Although, among the enumerated powers of government, we do not find the word 'bank,' we find the great powers to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the constitution, are constitutional."

The Court held that the authority to create the bank was implied from Congress's Spending and Taxing power in conjunction with the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, § 8). This clause grants Congress the authority to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution” the work of the Federal Government. The Necessary and Proper Clause, therefore, enables Congress to pass all laws necessary to effectively pursue its specified ends.

The case McCulloch v. Maryland set an important precedent regarding the expansion of Federal power and the interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause.

Supremacy Clause

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the issue of federal power and commerce. It is considered one of the most important cases regarding the expansion of federal power. The case involved the power of Congress to charter a bank, specifically the Second Bank of the United States, and sparked broader questions about the division of powers between states and the federal government.

The case centred around the constitutionality of Maryland's decision to impose a tax on banks within the state that were not chartered by the state legislature. The Second Bank of the United States, established by Congress in 1816, refused to comply with the tax, resulting in a lawsuit against its head, James William McCulloch.

The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled in favour of McCulloch and the federal government. Marshall's ruling concluded that Congress had the authority to create a national bank and that states did not have the power to tax or interfere with constitutional means by which the federal government exercised its authority. This ruling set a precedent that federal laws are supreme to state laws and that states cannot enact laws contrary to federal laws.

The "Necessary and Proper" Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, played a significant role in the Court's decision. This clause grants Congress the power to "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution" the work of the federal government. The Court interpreted this clause as providing Congress with implied powers beyond those explicitly listed in the Constitution. In this case, the Court held that the authority to create a national bank was implied from Congress's spending and taxing powers in conjunction with the Necessary and Proper Clause.

The McCulloch v. Maryland case established important principles regarding the supremacy of federal law and the interpretation of the Necessary and Proper Clause. It continues to shape the understanding of federal power and the balance of power between the states and the federal government in the United States.

Frequently asked questions