Workplace Privacy: What Are Your Rights?

Privacy is a complex issue in the workplace, with employees' rights varying depending on their location and the nature of their job. In general, employees have the right to keep private facts about themselves confidential and to some degree of personal space. However, employers often have broad leeway to monitor their employees, especially when it comes to communications technology and the internet usage of their workers. While employees may have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their homes or with their personal information, this becomes less clear in public places, including the workplace. In the case of an invasion of privacy lawsuit, a court will consider the nature of the intrusion and its overall effect, with the invasion of privacy needing to be one that a reasonable person would not expect.

Explore related products

Understanding Employment Law (Understanding Series)

$53.82

Artificial Intelligence: Legal Issues, Policy, and Practical Strategies

$138 $149.95

The Visible Employee: Using Workplace Monitoring and Surveillance to Protect Information Assets—Without Compromising Employee Privacy or Trust

$19.95

Information Privacy Law: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook)

$115.89 $345

Workplace Privacy: Proceedings of the New York University 58th Annual Conference on Labor (Proceedings of New York University Annual Conference)

$195.68 $206

Reasonable Expectations of Privacy?: Eleven country reports on camera surveillance and workplace privacy (Information Technology and Law Series, 7)

$54.99

Surveillance and monitoring

While federal law does not generally prohibit workplace monitoring, there are certain situations where employees may have a reasonable expectation of privacy. For example, employees typically have a high expectation of privacy in restrooms and changing areas, and employers are prohibited from installing surveillance cameras in these areas. Additionally, employees have the right to keep private facts about themselves confidential and to maintain some degree of personal space.

In some states, such as California, there are stronger privacy protections for employees. For instance, employers in California cannot demote, suspend, or terminate employees for their off-duty conduct as long as it is not illegal and occurs away from the workplace. California has also enacted laws that limit employers from accessing employees' social media accounts and prohibit them from demanding login information or requiring employees to access their accounts in the employer's presence.

If employees believe their privacy rights have been violated, they may have legal recourse. This could include filing a lawsuit against the employer or negotiating a settlement with the help of an employment attorney. To prove an invasion of privacy case, employees must show that their reasonable expectation of privacy outweighs the employer's reason for conducting the search or surveillance. Concrete evidence and employer policies that indicate certain areas or actions were considered private can strengthen an employee's case.

It is worth noting that privacy protections in the workplace can be complex, and employees should consult with a lawyer to understand their specific rights and options.

Accessing personal devices

In the US, privacy is not a right that is well protected in the workplace. While some state constitutions specify a right to privacy, employers generally have broad leeway. However, employees have the right to keep private facts about themselves confidential and the right to some degree of personal space.

In terms of personal devices, an employer usually cannot access them, unless you are using their Wi-Fi network. Even if you are using your own personal device outside of work and work hours, this information may be available to your employers and lead to serious consequences. For example, an employer may be able to discipline you for comments made online, even outside of business hours.

It is important to note that if an employer finds that you violated a workplace policy regarding the confidentiality of information, you may be subject to discipline or discharge, depending on your state's laws, your employer's policies, and the nature of your job. For instance, if you work in law enforcement or national security and are arrested for discharging a firearm while intoxicated, this could be an issue for your job, regardless of when the incident occurred.

In California, there is special protection of privacy written into its constitution, which grants citizens certain inalienable rights, including "pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy." As a result, employers cannot demote, suspend, or terminate employees for participating in conduct that is not illegal during off-duty hours, as long as the behaviour occurs away from the workplace.

If you believe that your privacy has been invaded in the workplace, you may want to consult an employment attorney to negotiate a settlement with your employer or, if necessary, file a lawsuit.

Medical records

In the US, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) includes strict provisions about handling information obtained about a disabled employee. Employers covered by the ADA must keep medical records and related documentation confidential and separate from other personnel records. They should only be accessible by essential staff, such as first aid workers, the employee's supervisor when reasonable accommodations are needed, government officials, and insurance companies requiring a medical exam.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) also requires employers providing group health plans to honour certain privacy obligations. However, despite these laws, workplace monitoring and surveillance are common and not generally prohibited by federal law. Employees' privacy rights are quite limited, and employers have broad rights to monitor workplace communications and require drug testing for job applicants.

In Australia, the Fair Work Act requires employers to keep certain personal information about employees in their records, such as personal and emergency contact details and terms and conditions of employment. While this information is not covered by the Australian Privacy Principles, the Principles do apply to personal information about unsuccessful job candidates, such as resumes, contact details, and academic transcripts.

In California, employees have specific privacy protections. They have the right to sue employers for violating reasonable expectations of privacy, as measured by widely accepted social norms. For example, an employer disclosing an employee's private medical information to their coworkers would likely violate these norms and constitute an invasion of privacy.

Overall, the protection of medical records in the workplace varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances. While there are laws in place to safeguard privacy, employees should be aware of their limited privacy rights and the potential for workplace monitoring and surveillance.

Explore related products

Privacy in the Workplace: A Guide for Human Resource Managers (Contributions in Librarianship and)

$112.28

Defining & Regulating Information Privacy in the American Workplace: A Proposal for Reform based on an Analysis of the Legal and Ethical Ramifications of Current Practices

$38

SuperVision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society

$17.53 $27.99

Drug Testing At Work: A Guide for Employers and Employees

$23.38 $24.95

Legal Guide to Social Media: Rights and Risks for Businesses and Entrepreneurs

$19.92 $19.95

Employment Law: A Guide to Hiring, Managing, and Firing for Employers and Employees [Connected eBook](Aspen Paralegal Series)

$129.96 $214.95

Social media snooping

Social media has become an integral part of our lives, and with it comes the concern for privacy. While some states have stronger privacy protections in the workplace than others, privacy is not a right that is well-protected in the workplace in general.

In the context of social media, employees generally do not want their employers snooping on their accounts. To address this issue, California enacted Labor Code Section 980 in 2013, which limits employers from accessing employee social media. This law prohibits employers from demanding that employees or job applicants provide their usernames or passwords to access their personal social media accounts. Employers also cannot require employees to access their social media accounts in their presence.

However, if an employer provides an employee with a work cellphone, they can access text messages, even if some are personal. Additionally, employers can monitor workplace communications, including email, telephone, and internet use, especially if it is through employer-owned technology.

To protect their privacy, employees should ensure that their privacy settings restrict access to their personal information on social media to only authorized individuals. If employees believe their reasonable expectations of privacy have been violated, they may consider contacting a labor attorney to discuss their options, which may include negotiating a settlement or filing a lawsuit.

Discrimination and harassment

Employees have the right to keep private facts about themselves confidential and the right to some degree of personal space. An employer who discloses private facts or lies about an employee may be held accountable in a civil action for invasion of privacy or defamation. Additionally, in most cases, employers are legally prohibited from videotaping employees in locker rooms and bathrooms.

Invasion of privacy in the workplace can lead to discrimination and harassment. For example, employers may gain access to information they are not legally permitted to use in the hiring process, such as age, race, or gender, through social media profiles. This can result in discrimination against individuals based on their membership in protected categories. Similarly, employers may use social media to discriminate based on an employee's off-duty activities, such as smoking during non-working hours, which is prohibited by "lifestyle discrimination" statutes in some states.

Another instance of privacy invasion that can lead to discrimination is unauthorized access to medical records. While employers generally cannot access medical records, certain exceptions exist for jobs in law enforcement and the military, which may have physical and mental health requirements.

Furthermore, drug testing is a privacy issue that can result in discrimination. While employers have broad rights to require drug testing for job applicants, most states have more restrictions on testing current employees. Discrimination may occur when drug testing is used selectively, such as requiring only African American applicants to undergo testing, which would violate federal and state discrimination laws.

In cases of discrimination or harassment resulting from privacy invasions, employees may seek legal recourse by contacting a labor attorney or discrimination lawyer to explore their options, including potential civil action.

Frequently asked questions