
Changing a constitutional amendment is a complex and time-consuming process that varies across different countries and political systems. In the United States, for instance, the Constitution provides two methods for proposing amendments: firstly, a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or secondly, a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Once an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures or state ratifying conventions, as determined by Congress. This process is designed to be challenging, with the framers of the Constitution intending for amendments to have a significant impact on the country and its citizens. Other countries, such as Germany, Turkey, and Austria, have their own unique processes and requirements for amending their constitutions, often involving supermajority votes in parliament or approval by citizen referendums.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Amendment Process | Very difficult and time-consuming |
| Amendment Proposal | Two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate |
| Alternative Process | Two-thirds of the State legislatures call for a constitutional convention |
| Ratification | Ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 of 50 States) |
| Ratification Process | Administered by the Archivist of the United States |
| Amendment Type | Interwoven into relevant sections or appended as supplemental additions |
| Amendment Difficulty | Requires a special procedure more stringent than ordinary legislation |
| Special Procedures | Supermajorities in the legislature, direct approval by the electorate in a referendum, or a combination of both |
| Example: Turkey | Proposed in writing by at least one-third of the members of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey |
| Example: Turkey | Adopted by a three-fifths majority of the total number of members of the Assembly by secret ballot |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- The US Constitution's Article V outlines two methods for amending
- Amendments require a two-thirds majority vote in the House of Representatives
- Amendments are ratified by three-quarters of state legislatures
- Amendments can be appended to the Constitution without altering existing text
- Amendments are proposed by Congress in the form of a joint resolution

The US Constitution's Article V outlines two methods for amending
The US Constitution, drafted in 1787, has been amended only 27 times since. The authority to amend the Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution, which outlines two methods for amending the nation's frame of government.
The first method, which has been the only method used thus far, authorises Congress to propose amendments whenever two-thirds of both Houses deem it necessary. This requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the amendment is then proposed in the form of a joint resolution. This joint resolution does not require presidential approval before it is sent out to the states for ratification.
The second method requires Congress to call a convention for proposing amendments upon the application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the states (34 as of 1959). This method has yet to be used, and a new Constitutional Convention has never happened.
Once an amendment has been proposed, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) to become an operative part of the Constitution. Congress determines the mode of ratification, which can be through the state legislatures or state ratifying conventions. The Archivist of the United States is responsible for administering the ratification process, and the Director of the Federal Register examines ratification documents for facial legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. When the required number of authenticated ratification documents is received, a formal proclamation is drafted for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution.
Understanding the First Amendment: Freedom's Safeguard
You may want to see also

Amendments require a two-thirds majority vote in the House of Representatives
The process of amending the US Constitution is a difficult and time-consuming endeavour. The authority to amend the Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution. This article outlines two methods for proposing amendments.
The first method, which has been used for all 33 proposed amendments, requires a two-thirds majority vote in the House of Representatives and the Senate. This means that two-thirds of the Members present in both chambers must vote in favour of the proposed amendment. It is important to note that this vote does not require the approval or signature of the President, unlike regular federal legislation. Once an amendment is approved by Congress, it is forwarded to the Office of the Federal Register for processing and publication.
The second method, which has never been used, involves a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. This method allows state legislatures to have a direct say in proposing amendments without going through Congress first.
After an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified to become an operative part of the Constitution. Ratification can occur through the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states) or by conventions in three-fourths of the states, as determined by Congress. The Archivist of the United States administers the ratification process, and once the required number of authenticated ratification documents is reached, a formal proclamation is drafted to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution.
The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately challenging, as Chief Justice John Marshall noted that it was written "to endure for ages to come." The difficulty in amending the Constitution ensures that any changes made are significant and have a lasting impact on the nation.
Constitutional Amendment Act: India's Landmark Law
You may want to see also

Amendments are ratified by three-quarters of state legislatures
The process of amending the US Constitution is a difficult and time-consuming endeavour. The authority to amend the Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution, which outlines two methods for proposing amendments and two methods for states to ratify them.
The first method of proposing an amendment requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This is the only method that has been used thus far, with 33 amendments proposed by Congress and submitted to the states for ratification. The second method is a convention option that has never been used. It requires a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures.
Once an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified. The first method of ratification requires three-quarters of state legislatures (38 out of 50 states) to approve the amendment. This is the most common method, with 27 amendments ratified by the states. The second method, which has only been used once, involves state conventions called for ratification votes instead of state legislatures.
The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately challenging, as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote that the Constitution was "to endure for ages to come". The difficulty of the process ensures that amendments are reserved for significant issues that impact all Americans or secure the rights of citizens.
Republicans' Constitutional Amendments: A Radical Trio
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Amendments can be appended to the Constitution without altering existing text
Amendments to a constitution are modifications that can be directly interwoven into the relevant sections of an existing constitution, thus altering the text. However, it is also possible to append amendments to the constitution as supplemental additions or codicils. This approach changes the frame of government without altering the existing text of the foundational document. Most constitutions require that amendments be enacted through a special procedure that is typically more stringent than the process for passing ordinary legislation.
For example, in the United States, the Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, indicating the difficulty of the amendment process. Article V of the US Constitution outlines two methods for amending the nation's frame of government. The first method, as per Article V, authorises Congress to propose amendments whenever two-thirds of both houses deem it necessary. This proposal takes the form of a joint resolution, which does not require the President's signature or approval. Once approved by Congress, the proposed amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) to become an operative part of the Constitution.
The second method, also outlined in Article V, requires Congress to call a convention for proposing amendments upon the application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the states (34 as of 1959). This method recognises the role of state legislatures or state conventions in the amendment process. Interestingly, none of the 27 amendments to the US Constitution have been proposed by a constitutional convention, despite the option being available.
While the US Constitution requires a supermajority in the legislature to propose amendments, other countries have different requirements. For instance, the Constitution of Ethiopia can only be modified by a two-thirds majority of the country's regions and a two-thirds majority of a joint session of the Federal Parliamentary Assembly. In contrast, the Constitution of Austria is considered unusually liberal, allowing any piece of parliamentary legislation to be designated as "constitutional law" if the required supermajority and other formalities are met.
In summary, while amending a constitution is generally a challenging process, it is possible to append amendments without altering the existing text. The specific requirements for doing so vary across different constitutions and countries, with some requiring supermajorities in the legislature, direct approval by citizens in a referendum, or a combination of special procedures.
Executive and Legislative Powers: War and Amendments
You may want to see also

Amendments are proposed by Congress in the form of a joint resolution
The process of amending the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. Amendments are proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This is done in the form of a joint resolution, which is then forwarded directly to the National Archives and Records Administration's (NARA) Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishes it in slip law format. This process skips the President, who does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, and the joint resolution does not require their signature or approval.
The original document is then sent to the states for ratification, with Congress determining the method by which the states must ratify the amendment. The two methods for ratification are through the state legislatures or state ratifying conventions. For an amendment to become part of the Constitution, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50). Once an amendment is ratified by the required number of states, it becomes an operative part of the Constitution, and no further action is required.
The process of amending the Constitution is intentionally difficult and time-consuming. The framers of the Constitution made it challenging to ensure its longevity. As a result, there have only been 27 successful amendments since the Constitution was drafted in 1787. Amendments should be reserved for significant changes that impact all Americans or secure the rights of citizens.
The US Constitution: Unamended, Why?
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
A constitutional amendment is a modification of the constitution of a polity, organization, or other type of entity. Amendments are often interwoven into the relevant sections of an existing constitution, directly altering the text.
The authority to amend the US Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution. A proposed amendment must be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states).
The Constitution of Turkey states that an amendment to the Constitution shall be proposed in writing by at least one-third of the total number of members of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey. The adoption of a bill for an amendment shall require a three-fifths majority of the total number of members of the Assembly by secret ballot.
The Constitution of Austria is liberal in terms of constitutional amendments. Any piece of parliamentary legislation can be designated as "constitutional law" if the required supermajority and other formalities for an amendment are met. An amendment may take the form of a change of the Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, a change to another constitutional act, a new constitutional act, or a section of constitutional law in a non-constitutional act.
The Constitution of Ethiopia can only be modified by a two-thirds majority of the country's regions and a two-thirds majority of a joint session of the Federal Parliamentary Assembly in accordance with Article 105.






















![The Concept of Due Process of Law in 1866 and Its Influence on the Fourteenth Amendment / by Herbert Thompson Leyland 1922 [Leather Bound]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/617DLHXyzlL._AC_UY218_.jpg)


