Amending The Constitution: Requirements And Process

A constitutional amendment is a modification of the constitution of a polity, organization, or other type of entity. Most constitutions require that amendments be enacted through a special procedure that is more stringent than the process for passing ordinary legislation. In the United States, for example, amendments to the Constitution may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Amendments must then be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) to become part of the Constitution. Other countries, such as Ireland and Australia, require amendments to be passed by the legislature before being submitted to a referendum for approval by the people. The requirements for a constitutional amendment can vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction and the specific procedures and requirements outlined in their constitution.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Legal Guide for Police: Constitutional Issues

$31.85 $54.95

The United States Constitution: with Amendments (XXVII)

$0.99 $3.99

War and Responsibility: Constitutional Lessons of Vietnam and Its Aftermath

$58 $58

The Law Officer’s Pocket Manual, 2023 Edition

$21.98 $42.99

The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the United States (Bantam Classic)

$5.53 $5.95

Amendments must be of major impact and affect all citizens

The requirements for amending a constitution vary across jurisdictions. In the United States, for example, a proposed amendment must be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress and then ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50). This process underscores the importance of ensuring that amendments have a significant impact on the nation as a whole and protect the rights of all citizens.

The process of amending a constitution is deliberately challenging and time-consuming, as it is meant to prevent hasty or impulsive changes to the foundational document of a nation. To pass, an amendment must address issues that are of national significance and have a broad impact on the lives of citizens. This threshold helps to ensure that the amendment process is reserved for matters that truly warrant such a substantial change.

For instance, in the history of the United States, amendments have been used to grant women the right to vote, abolish poll taxes, and lower the minimum voting age. These amendments had a profound impact on the lives of citizens and helped secure their fundamental rights. Similarly, in South Africa, while the Constitution can be amended by an Act of Parliament, special procedures and requirements apply to ensure that any changes are carefully considered and have a significant impact on the nation.

In some countries, the amendment process may involve a referendum, where the proposed changes are put directly to the voters. For example, in Ireland, a simple majority of voters is required for an amendment to pass, while in Australia, a majority of voters in a majority of states is needed. This direct involvement of citizens in the amendment process ensures that any changes made to the constitution reflect the will of the people and have their support.

Additionally, some states in the United States, such as Tennessee, require amendments to their state constitutions to be approved by a majority of voters in the entire election. This further highlights the importance of ensuring that amendments have a broad impact and are not solely driven by the interests of a small group or region. By requiring widespread support, the amendment process becomes a tool for reinforcing national unity and shared values.

Amendments proposed by Congress require a two-thirds majority vote

The process of amending the Constitution varies across different jurisdictions. In the United States, the Constitution grants Congress the authority to propose amendments with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This process, outlined in Article V of the Constitution, is the only method that has been used thus far. It is important to note that the President does not have a constitutional role in this process, and their signature or approval is not required.

The two-thirds majority vote in each house is calculated based on the members present, assuming a quorum is met, rather than the entire membership. This means that at least two-thirds of the members present in both the House and the Senate must vote in favour of the proposed amendment for it to pass. This process highlights the importance of ensuring a significant level of support for any changes made to the Constitution.

While Congress has the power to propose amendments, the ratification process can occur through two methods as determined by Congress. The first method requires the approval of three-fourths of the state legislatures, while the second method involves gaining approval from three-fourths of state ratifying conventions. This flexibility in the ratification process allows for broader representation and input from different states during the amendment process.

The United States is not alone in its stringent amendment processes. Other countries, such as Ireland, Australia, and Estonia, also have specific procedures for amending their constitutions. For example, in Ireland and Australia, amendments are drafted as Acts of Parliament but must also be approved in a referendum to become law. These examples demonstrate the importance placed on careful consideration and broad support when making changes to a nation's fundamental governing document.

The two-thirds majority vote requirement for Congress to propose constitutional amendments in the United States is a crucial step in the amendment process. It ensures that any changes to the nation's foundational document reflect the consensus of a supermajority in both chambers of Congress, solidifying the amendment's legitimacy and importance. This process reinforces the stability and longevity of the Constitution while allowing for necessary amendments to be made over time.

Amendments can be appended to the constitution without altering existing text

The process of amending a constitution varies across jurisdictions. In the United States, the authority to amend the Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution. Amendments are typically proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This proposal takes the form of a joint resolution, which does not require the President's signature or approval. Once proposed, an amendment becomes part of the Constitution when it is ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 out of 50).

While amendments commonly interweave with existing constitutional text, directly altering it, they can also be appended as supplemental additions, or codicils. This method of amending the constitution without altering its existing text is particularly relevant when the existing text is challenging to amend. For example, the constitution's Chapter Three, which outlines Human and democratic rights, and Articles 104 and 105, are almost unamendable as they require total consensus from federal regional states and a two-thirds majority in each house of Parliament. In such cases, appending amendments as supplemental additions ensures that the existing text remains intact while allowing for necessary changes to be made.

The process of appending amendments without altering the existing text can be especially useful when addressing specific issues or concerns. For instance, in the United States, amendments have been proposed to outlaw flag burning, protect crime victims' rights, allow voluntary school prayer, establish English as the official language, and abolish the Electoral College. These amendments can be seen as additions that build upon the existing framework of rights and governance without directly changing the existing constitutional text.

Some jurisdictions have specific requirements for amending their constitutions. For example, Australia and Ireland require that amendments be passed by the legislature before being submitted to the people for approval. In Ireland, a simple majority of voters is sufficient, while Australia requires a majority of voters in a majority of states. Similarly, four states in the United States—Hawaii, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Wyoming—mandate that amendments receive approval from a majority of voters in the entire election. These procedures ensure that any changes to the constitution reflect the will of the people and are not solely decided by legislative bodies.

The process of appending amendments without altering the text allows for flexibility and responsiveness to the needs and desires of the populace while maintaining the integrity of the existing constitution. It provides a mechanism for implementing changes that may not fit within the existing framework without requiring a complete overhaul of the document. This approach can help strike a balance between stability and adaptability in governance.

Explore related products

Constitutional Diplomacy

$88.35 $93

Constitutional Bricolage: The Art of the Do-it-Yourself Handyman Who Must Solve Problems Given Only Limited Tools and His Own Ingenuity

$39

The Constitution of the United States of America and Other Writings of the Founding Fathers (Volume 7) (Timeless Classics, 7)

$28

Rule of Law: Why and How We Must Amend the Constitution

$6.99 $14.95

Land Use and the Constitution: Principles for Planning Practice (AICP Handbook)

$82.99 $190

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual: 2020 Edition

$32.87 $42.95

Amendments must be approved by three-fourths of state legislatures

The requirements for amending a constitution vary across jurisdictions. In the United States, for instance, a constitutional amendment originates as a special joint resolution of Congress that does not require the President's signature or approval. Amendments can be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures.

Once an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified. There are two methods for states to ratify amendments: through the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) or by conventions in three-fourths of the states. Congress decides which method the states must follow for a proposed amendment to become effective. The Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for administering the ratification process.

Some states, such as Hawaii, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Wyoming, require amendments to be approved by a majority of voters in the entire election. In contrast, Illinois allows amendments to be approved by either three-fifths of voters on the amendment or a majority of voters in the entire election. Florida is unique in that it has two separate commissions that can place amendments directly on the ballot for voter approval: the Constitution Revision Commission and the Taxation and Budget Reform Commission.

Other countries, such as Ireland, Estonia, and Australia, have different procedures for amending their constitutions. For example, in Ireland and Australia, amendments are drafted as Acts of Parliament but must also be approved in a referendum. In Ethiopia, each regional state has the right to veto amendments to certain articles of the constitution. The Constitution of South Africa can be amended by an Act of Parliament, but special procedures and requirements apply.

Some amendments require approval by a majority of voters in an election

The process of amending a constitution varies across different jurisdictions. Some countries, like Ireland, Estonia, and Australia, require amendments to be passed by the legislature before being submitted to the people for approval in a referendum. In the United States, a proposed amendment originates as a joint resolution of Congress, which does not require the President's signature or approval. Amendments to the US Constitution are proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Some states in the US, like Tennessee, require amendments to be approved by a majority of voters in an election. This process involves the Tennessee General Assembly passing a resolution with the proposed amendment's wording, which must pass three separate readings on three separate days with an absolute majority. After the legislative election, the proposed amendment undergoes the same procedure before being put on the ballot as a referendum in the gubernatorial election. This legislative method ensures that the amendment is approved by a majority of voters before implementation.

Hawaii, Minnesota, and Wyoming are other states that require amendments to be approved by a majority of voters in the entire election. In these states, abstaining from voting on an amendment is considered a "no" vote. Illinois offers a variation, allowing amendments to be approved by either three-fifths of voters on the amendment or a majority of voters in the entire election.

While the process of amending a constitution can vary, the common theme is the requirement for a majority vote, whether by legislators or citizens, to approve proposed amendments. This ensures that any changes to the fundamental laws governing a polity, organization, or entity reflect the will of the people and are not easily reversible.

Frequently asked questions