Controversial Constitution: Founding Fathers' Contentious Issues

The Constitution of the United States, drafted in 1787, is considered one of the most important documents in American history. However, its creation was marked by significant controversy and debate. One of the major points of contention was the issue of representation, with smaller states concerned about being overshadowed by larger states in the legislative branch, leading to the creation of the Great Compromise, which established a bicameral legislature with equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives. Another controversial issue was the balance of power between the federal government and the states, with delegates fearing that a strong federal government could oppress citizens, resulting in a compromise that allotted specific responsibilities to the federal government while delegating other functions to the states. Additionally, the absence of a clear statement protecting individual rights in the original Constitution sparked opposition, prompting the addition of a Bill of Rights, which included protections for freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. The institution of slavery was also a contentious issue, with Southern states seeking to preserve its legality to protect their economic interests, while Northern states raised moral and ethical concerns.

Explore related products

HIDDEN HISTORY AND CONTROVERSY OF BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: The 14th Amendment: A Riveting Journey Through America's Deepest Legal and Political Debate

$7.99 $15.99

A Century of Controversy: Constitutional Reform in Alabama

$24.95

Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy

$20.99 $41.99

Roe v. Wade: The Abortion Rights Controversy in American History (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$29.95

Hate Speech: The History of an American Controversy

$11.25 $15.95

Gun Control and the Constitution: The Courts, Congress, and the Second Amendment

$38.32 $58.99

The balance of power between federal government and states

The balance of power between the federal government and the states was a highly contentious issue during the drafting of the US Constitution. The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, had established a weak central government with limited authority over the states. This had resulted in economic chaos, with states competing against each other, issuing their own currencies, and imposing taxes on goods from other states.

Delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, including Washington, Madison, and Hamilton, sought to address these issues by creating a stronger central government. They believed that consolidating power in a federal government would promote interstate commerce and make America an economic powerhouse. However, this proposal faced significant opposition from those who feared that a powerful central government would infringe on states' rights and oppress their citizens.

The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the Constitution, argued that a strong central government resembled the one they had recently overthrown. They wanted to maintain the sovereignty of the states and prevent the federal government from overruling state laws. On the other hand, the Federalists believed that a robust national government was necessary to address the nation's challenges effectively.

To strike a balance, the Constitution's framers devised a system of checks and balances, dividing federal authority among the legislative, judicial, and executive branches. They also established a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives favouring large states and the Senate providing equal representation for small states. This compromise ensured that both populations and individual states were fairly represented in Congress.

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention had to navigate complex political dynamics and conflicting interests to reach a consensus on the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Ultimately, their efforts resulted in a constitution that has endured and been emulated worldwide.

The protection of individual rights

One of the key concerns was the issue of slavery. While the word "slavery" is absent from the Constitution, it was central to debates over commerce and representation. The "Three-Fifths Compromise" counted three-fifths of each state's enslaved population towards congressional representation, increasing southern states' seats. Delegates also debated whether the federal government could ban the importation of enslaved people, ultimately agreeing to allow Congress to do so after 20 years.

Another issue was the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Large and small states disagreed over representation in Congress, with the former favouring representation by population and the latter arguing for equal representation. The "Great Compromise" resolved this by establishing the House of Representatives, apportioned by population, and the Senate, which represented states equally.

Additionally, there were disputes over state versus federal powers. Some delegates believed the federal government should be able to overrule state laws, while others feared this would lead to citizen oppression. The Constitution addressed this through a system of checks and balances, dividing federal authority among the legislative, judicial, and executive branches.

The issue of representation

One of the key debates centred around representation in Congress. Large states advocated for representation based on population, while small states favoured equal representation for each state. This dispute was resolved through the "Great Compromise," which established the House of Representatives, apportioned by population, and the Senate, where each state had equal representation. This compromise addressed the concerns of both sides and ensured that both large and small states had a voice in the legislative process.

Slavery and the representation of enslaved people in Congress was another contentious issue. The "Three-Fifths Compromise" was reached, wherein three-fifths of the enslaved population in each state was counted towards congressional representation. This compromise disproportionately benefited the Southern states, increasing their representation in Congress. Additionally, the delegates debated the federal government's authority to ban the importation of enslaved people, ultimately granting Congress the power to do so after a period of 20 years.

The delegates also discussed the role of the Electoral College in selecting the president, holding over 60 votes before agreeing on this method. They trusted George Washington, who was expected to become the first president, to define the office.

The delegates' efforts resulted in a powerful central government and a constitution that has endured and been emulated worldwide.

Explore related products

The Detroit School Busing Case: Milliken v. Bradley and the Controversy over Desegregation (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$18.52 $29.99

The Second Amendment and Gun Control: Freedom, Fear, and the American Constitution (Controversies in American Constitutional Law)

$56.04 $58.99

The State and Federal Courts: A Complete Guide to History, Powers, and Controversy

$83.31 $115.2

The Constitutional Controversy in Rhode Island in 1841

$14.75

Uncivil Wars: The Controversy Over Reparations for Slavery

$30.5

Reconstructing the National Bank Controversy: Politics and Law in the Early American Republic

$26.97 $31.99

The morality and ethics of slavery

The Three-Fifths Clause, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes, gave Southern states with large slave populations greater representation in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College. This clause, along with the ban on Congress ending the slave trade for twenty years, the Fugitive Slave Clause, and the slave insurrections, were specific clauses in the Constitution that addressed slavery without explicitly mentioning it. The framers intentionally avoided using the word "slave" out of embarrassment and the belief that slavery was morally wrong, instead referring to slaves as "persons."

During the Constitutional Convention, there were strong objections to slavery on moral grounds. Luther Martin of Maryland, a slaveholder himself, argued that the slave trade was inconsistent with America's republican ideals and dishonored the American character. Thomas Jefferson, in his "Notes on the State of Virginia" (1785), attacked slavery as a "cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty." James Madison, in his "Notes on the Federal Convention" (1787), echoed these sentiments, stating that the slave trade continued "in defiance of the most sacred laws of humanity."

However, the need for compromise and the belief that slavery would eventually fade led to the inclusion of clauses that protected slavery. Many of the framers, including Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, had moral qualms about slavery and became members of anti-slavery societies. They knew that slavery violated the principles of equality and natural rights enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. Yet, they feared that if the Constitution restricted the slave trade, Southern states like South Carolina and Georgia would refuse to join the Union. This compromise, as Madison later acknowledged, highlighted the "real difference of interests" between the Northern and Southern states.

The Constitution's ambiguous stance on slavery set the stage for future conflicts and had lasting repercussions. As new states entered the union as either slaveholding or free states, the divide between the two blocs intensified, eventually leading to the Civil War. The Fugitive Slave Clause, in particular, implicated the federal government in the protection of people as property, a stark contradiction to the principles of liberty and equality. The legacy of slavery continues to impact various aspects of American society, including voting rights, fair housing, public safety, and employment.

The selection of the president

The initial proposal, put forward by Virginia delegate James Madison, was the Virginia Plan, which suggested a legislative body choose the president. This proposal reflected a fear of direct democracy and a belief in the need for checks and balances to prevent majority tyranny. The plan proposed an indirect election of the president by Congress, which would also have the power to remove the president. This system would ensure the president's dependence on the legislature and prevent the emergence of a powerful, independent executive.

However, this proposal faced strong opposition from those who favored a stronger executive and direct popular participation in the selection of the president. They argued that the president should be independent of the legislature to serve as an effective check on legislative power. Alexander Hamilton, a prominent supporter of a strong executive, proposed that the president be elected for life, emphasizing the need for a stable and powerful leader.

The final compromise, reached after lengthy debates, was the Electoral College system. This system, outlined in Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, is a complex blend of popular vote and indirect election. The Electoral College system was designed to balance the competing interests of small and large states, as well as address concerns about the potential for corruption or unqualified candidates in a direct popular vote.

In the Electoral College system, each state is allocated a number of electors equal to its representation in Congress (both senators and representatives). These electors then cast their votes for president. Most states have adopted a "winner-take-all" approach, where the candidate who wins the popular vote in a state receives all of that state's electoral votes. This process reflects a desire to ensure that the president has a mandate from the people while also addressing concerns about the potential shortcomings of a purely popular vote.

While the Electoral College system has been a longstanding feature of US democracy, it has also been a subject of criticism and calls for reform. Some argue that it undermines the principle of "one person, one vote" and can result in a president being elected without winning the popular vote. The selection of the president, a topic of intense debate during the drafting of the Constitution, continues to be a subject of discussion and reflection in American political discourse.

Frequently asked questions