Compromise: The Constitution's Cornerstone

The U.S. Constitution, ratified by all 13 states in 1789, is often referred to as a bundle of compromises. This is because delegates from each state had differing interests and views, and compromise was necessary to create a government charter acceptable to all. One of the most significant compromises was the Great Compromise, or Connecticut Compromise, which addressed the issue of congressional representation. Another was the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved Africans as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes. The issue of slavery was a contentious topic, with delegates compromising to delay the abolition of the slave trade until 1808. Other compromises included the creation of the Electoral College and the vote now, amend later compromise in Massachusetts.

Explore related products

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

The Taming of Free Speech: America’s Civil Liberties Compromise

$53 $53

Justice Robert H. Jackson's Unpublished Opinion in Brown v. Board: Conflict, Compromise, and Constitutional Interpretation

$49.99 $54.99

Constitutional Law (Aspen Casebook)

$121.6 $269

The Union As It Is: Constitutional Unionism and Sectional Compromise, 1787-1861

$63.31 $50

Constitutional Convention of 1787, The: A Reference Guide (Guides to Historic Events in America)

$15.23 $29.95

The Great Compromise

The drafting of the U.S. Constitution, also known as the "bundle of compromises", involved several key compromises that were essential to creating a government charter acceptable to each of the 13 states. One of the most significant compromises was the Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise.

Another critical compromise was reached over the issue of slavery and the slave trade. Delegates from Northern states, where the economy was not heavily dependent on slavery, opposed counting enslaved people towards representation. In contrast, Southern states fought for enslaved individuals to be included in representation calculations. The Three-Fifths Compromise was reached, where every five enslaved people were counted as three individuals for purposes of congressional representation and taxation. Additionally, the delegates agreed to delay the abolition of the slave trade until 1808, despite efforts by some to include an immediate ban in the Constitution.

Overall, compromise was an essential tool in drafting the U.S. Constitution. The delegates' ability to find common ground on divisive issues, such as state representation and slavery, allowed them to create a government that balanced the interests of all the states and laid the foundation for the modern U.S. political system.

The Three-Fifths Compromise

While the Three-Fifths Compromise was a necessary concession to forge a unified Constitution, it ultimately failed to resolve the deep-seated tensions between the North and the South over slavery. The issue of slavery continued to be a volatile topic, and despite the compromise, the Union would eventually be torn apart by the Civil War.

In conclusion, the Three-Fifths Compromise was a critical yet temporary solution during the drafting of the U.S. Constitution. It addressed the conflicting interests between the Northern and Southern states regarding slavery and representation. While it managed to hold the Union together at that time, it did not provide a permanent resolution to the issue of slavery, which would continue to plague the nation in the years to come.

The Electoral College

> "Men chosen by the people for the special purpose [of selecting the president] will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations."

Explore related products

Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution

$17.61 $20

Noble Undertaking: Volume 1: The Continental Congress and the American Revolution, 1774–78

$12.1 $39.95

Backlash Presidents: From Transformative to Reactionary Leaders in American History (Princeton Studies in American Politics)

$29.95 $29.95

A Hell of a Storm: The Battle for Kansas, the End of Compromise, and the Coming of the Civil War

$17.65 $32

A Fire Bell in the Past: The Missouri Crisis at 200, Volume I, Western Slavery, National Impasse (Studies in Constitutional Democracy Book 1)

$42.75 $45

Blueprint for Revolution: How to Use Rice Pudding, Lego Men, and Other Nonviolent Techniques to Galvanize Communities, Overthrow Dictators, or Simply Change the World

$16 $19

The slave trade

The issue of slavery was a highly contentious topic during the drafting of the US Constitution. Of the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention, about 25 owned slaves, and many had moral qualms about the practice. The word "slave" does not appear in the Constitution, with the framers consciously avoiding the word, recognising that it would sully the document. Instead, the framers used vague wording such as "importation of such persons" or "all other persons".

The Three-Fifths Compromise, also known as the Constitutional Compromise of 1787, was an agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention over the inclusion of slaves in counting a state's total population. This count would determine the number of seats in the House of Representatives, the number of electoral votes each state would be allocated, and how much money the states would pay in taxes. The compromise counted three-fifths of each state's slave population toward that state's total population for the purpose of apportioning the House of Representatives, effectively giving the Southern states more power in the House relative to the North. This compromise was unsustainable and ultimately led to the Civil War.

Another compromise related to the slave trade was the agreement to ban any restrictions on the Atlantic slave trade for 20 years in exchange for the removal of a clause restricting the national government's power to enact laws requiring goods to be shipped on American vessels. This agreement was reached on August 25, 1787, and was known as the Slavery Compromise. The delegates agreed to permit Congress to prohibit the slave trade in 1808, with the final version of the Constitution permitting Congress to discourage the trade by taxation in the meantime.

The framers of the Constitution believed that concessions on slavery were necessary to gain the support of southern delegates for a strong central government. They were convinced that if the Constitution restricted the slave trade, states like South Carolina and Georgia would refuse to join the Union. By sidestepping the issue of slavery, the framers left the seeds for future conflict.

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists

The Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, believed in the creation of a centralised national government with broad executive powers. They argued that a stronger federal government would provide a solid foundation for growth and prosperity, particularly in urban areas. The Federalists also wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation, which they saw as too weak.

The Anti-Federalists, led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, opposed the concentration of power in a central government. They feared that a powerful presidency would evolve into a monarchy and that the national government would become unresponsive to local needs. The Anti-Federalists wanted to preserve the autonomy of the states and protect individual rights, particularly in rural areas and for farmers. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of liberties and an erosion of state sovereignty.

The debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were passionate and sometimes violent. In 1787 and 1788, as the country debated the ratification of the Constitution, both sides held meetings and marches that occasionally escalated into brawls. Despite their opposition, the Anti-Federalists influenced the addition of a Bill of Rights to the Constitution, ensuring the protection of specific liberties.

Frequently asked questions