Jefferson's Stance: National Bank Constitutionality

The debate over the establishment of a national bank in the United States during the late 18th century pitted Thomas Jefferson and James Madison against Alexander Hamilton and George Washington. Jefferson and Madison, ardent nationalists, argued that the creation of a national bank was unconstitutional, as it was not a power granted under the enumerated powers nor was it necessary and proper. Hamilton, on the other hand, took a more liberal reading of the necessary and proper clause, asserting that Congress should do whatever it deemed necessary to fulfil national duties. This debate reflected the broader ideological divide between Jefferson and Hamilton, with the former arguing that a strong federal government would lead to tyranny, while the latter believed in a strong federal government.

Explore related products

All Honor to Jefferson?: The Virginia Slavery Debates and the Positive Good Thesis

$73.7 $136

Great American Eclipse

$2.99

Guns of the Vietnam War

$2.99

The Federal reserve act, the National-bank act and all other federal laws relating to banking: with complete indexes and references

$15.99

First National Bank Of Dad Shirt National Bank Of Dad Tee T-Shirt

$15.99

Reconstructing the National Bank Controversy: Politics and Law in the Early American Republic

$26.97 $31.99

Jefferson believed a national bank was unconstitutional

Thomas Jefferson believed that the establishment of a national bank was unconstitutional. In 1791, Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, proposed the creation of a national bank, modelled on Great Britain's national bank, to address the United States' Revolutionary War debt, establish a single national currency, and stimulate the economy. Jefferson, a Republican, fundamentally disagreed with this proposal, arguing that it exceeded the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution.

Jefferson's opinion on the constitutionality of a national bank was influenced by his interpretation of the necessary and proper clause, which was part of Article I of the Constitution. This clause allowed Congress to make laws and provisions beyond the enumerated powers. Hamilton interpreted this clause liberally, believing that Congress should take any action necessary to fulfil national responsibilities. In contrast, Jefferson advocated for a stricter interpretation, contending that Congress should only act when absolutely necessary.

Jefferson presented several specific arguments against the constitutionality of a national bank. Firstly, he asserted that the power to erect a bank was not among the enumerated powers granted to Congress. He believed that establishing a bank was distinct from regulating commerce, and that the power to regulate commerce did not extend to internal commerce within a state. Jefferson also questioned the necessity of a national bank, suggesting that the world could "go on very well without it". He emphasised that convenience was not a valid justification for breaking down fundamental state laws.

Furthermore, Jefferson disagreed with the idea of a national bank on ideological grounds. He favoured states' rights and believed that a national bank would unfairly favour wealthy businessmen in urban areas over farmers in rural regions. Jefferson's opposition to Hamilton's proposal was well-known, and their debate marked a significant moment in the early political history of the United States, shaping the ongoing discussion about the role and powers of the federal government.

Alexander Hamilton proposed the bank to manage war debt

In 1789, President George Washington appointed Alexander Hamilton as the first secretary of the treasury, with the task of solving the nation's debt. At the time, the US owed almost $80 million in foreign, domestic, and state debts, largely due to the Continental Army. Hamilton had 110 days to prepare a report on the nation's credit status, which he presented to Congress in January 1790.

Hamilton proposed to fund the debt through a gradual schedule of dependable tax resources, assuming state debts, and generating new revenue through western land sales and luxury taxes. He also suggested that the US view debt not as a problem but as an asset. His report caused an uproar, but the House eventually passed a bill incorporating his recommendations.

In December 1790, Hamilton submitted his proposal for a national bank, modelled after the Bank of England. He wished to solidify the partnership between the government and the business classes, and to strengthen the national government. He also wanted the government to develop bank branches in major cities, a uniform currency, and a place for the federal government to deposit or borrow money when needed.

Hamilton's proposal for a national bank was met with fierce criticism, including from James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson, who was then secretary of state, believed that a national bank was unconstitutional and unfairly favoured wealthy businessmen in urban areas over farmers. He also argued that the enumerated powers of the government did not include the authority to create a bank. Despite the opposition, Washington signed the bill for a national bank on February 25, 1791.

Jefferson believed states should charter their own banks

Thomas Jefferson believed that states should charter their own banks, as opposed to the establishment of a national bank. In 1791, Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, debated the constitutionality of establishing a national bank. Hamilton, a leading voice of the Federalists, argued for a national bank based on Great Britain's national bank. He wanted the government to develop bank branches in major cities, a uniform currency, and a place for the federal government to deposit or borrow money when required.

Jefferson, a Republican, disagreed with Hamilton's proposal, believing that a national bank was unconstitutional. He argued that the creation of a national bank was not a power granted under the enumerated powers, nor was it necessary and proper. Jefferson also believed that a national bank would unfairly favour wealthy businessmen in urban areas over farmers in the country. He stated that the power to erect a bank was not among those specifically enumerated in the Constitution, and that Congress did not have the authority to regulate the internal commerce of a state.

Jefferson's opinion on the matter was that the Constitution did not intend for Congress to break down ancient and fundamental state laws for the sake of convenience. He further asserted that the establishment of a national bank was not a bill to raise money or borrow money, and that the power to erect a bank was distinct from the power to regulate commerce.

Despite Jefferson's opposition, a national bank was eventually established, with President Washington agreeing with Hamilton's proposal. This disagreement between Jefferson and Hamilton marked the first substantial break over public policy, highlighting their opposing views on the role of the federal government. Jefferson, along with Madison, believed that too much power in the hands of the federal government would lead to tyranny.

Explore related products

Photographs from the Collection of Lasalle National Bank

$28.94

The Swiss National Bank: An Unconventional History (Routledge Explorations in Economic History)

$56.99 $190

The National-bank Act As Amended: The Federal Reserve Act And Other Laws Relating To National Banks

$28.95

Standard Catalog of National Bank Notes

$140

NBG National Bank of Grandpa Tee - Father's Day Gift

$17.99

The Role of a National Bank Director: The Directors Book

$16.99

Hamilton's view was that Congress should do what was necessary

Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, believed that a national bank was necessary for the United States. Hamilton's vision for the country was shaped by his understanding that America's future lay in business and industry, and that a powerful economic system was required for the country to develop into an industrial power.

Hamilton's proposal for a national bank was based on Great Britain's national bank. He wanted the government to establish bank branches in major cities, develop a uniform currency, and create a place for the federal government to deposit or borrow money when needed. Hamilton recognised that the economy was in a shambles after the Revolution, and he wanted to establish a steady revenue stream by taxing imported goods. He also proposed that the federal government should assume the debts of the states, an idea that was opposed by states like Virginia, which had already paid their debts.

On the other hand, Thomas Jefferson, a Republican, disagreed with Hamilton's proposal for a national bank, arguing that it was unconstitutional. Jefferson believed that states should charter their own banks and that a national bank unfairly favoured wealthy businessmen in urban areas over farmers in the country. He also held a different interpretation of the necessary and proper clause, arguing that Congress should only take actions that were absolutely necessary and no more.

The battle between Hamilton and Jefferson over the establishment of a national bank and the interpretation of the Constitution reflected a broader debate about the role of the federal government in the newly formed United States.

Jefferson thought this gave Congress too much power

Thomas Jefferson believed that the establishment of a national bank was unconstitutional and that it gave Congress too much power. He argued that the creation of a national bank was not a power granted under the enumerated powers, nor was it necessary and proper. Jefferson believed that states should charter their own banks and that a national bank unfairly favoured wealthy businessmen in urban areas over farmers in the country.

In his opinion on the constitutionality of the bill for establishing a national bank, Jefferson wrote that the power to erect a bank was not among the powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution. He argued that the Constitution only granted Congress the power to regulate external commerce, or commerce with another state, foreign nations, or Indian tribes, and not the internal commerce of a state. Jefferson also believed that the establishment of a national bank would give Congress the power to break down ancient and fundamental laws of the states, such as those against Mortmain, the laws of Alienage, the rules of descent, and the acts of distribution.

Jefferson's views on the national bank were in contrast to those of Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury under George Washington. Hamilton wanted to create a national bank based on Great Britain's national bank, with branches in major cities, a uniform currency, and a place for the federal government to deposit or borrow money. He took a more liberal reading of the necessary and proper clause, believing that Congress should do anything it felt was necessary to carry out national responsibilities.

The debate over the establishment of a national bank was part of a larger argument between Jefferson and Hamilton, who had differing views on the role of the federal government. Jefferson, a Republican, argued that too much power in the hands of the federal government would lead to tyranny. On the other hand, Hamilton, a leading voice of the Federalists, believed that a strong federal government was necessary. Despite Jefferson's opposition, a national bank was eventually established.

Frequently asked questions