Malcolm Rivera
The Electoral College is a process established by the Founding Fathers in the US Constitution to elect the president and vice president. It has been a topic of debate since its inception, with critics arguing that it is not representative of the popular will of the nation and that it dilutes the political power of Black voters. The College comprises 538 electors, with each state having a number of electors equal to its Congressional delegation. The College has faced several contested elections and has been criticised for its divergence from the national popular vote. The process has been defended as ensuring that large states do not dominate small ones in presidential elections and that there is a balance of power between Congress and state legislatures.
Explore related products
![The 21st-Century Voter: Who Votes, How They Vote, and Why They Vote [2 volumes]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81ZGc113JIL._AC_UY218_.jpg)
What You'll Learn
The Electoral College was established as a compromise
The Electoral College is a process that was established by the Founding Fathers in the US Constitution as a compromise between two voting systems. The College comprises 538 electors, with each state allocated presidential electors equal to the number of its representatives and senators. This means that each state is entitled to a minimum of three electors.
The Constitutional Convention in 1787 debated the merits of Congress selecting the president versus a direct nationwide popular vote. The former was favoured by delegates who wished to prevent the concentration of power in large states, while the latter was preferred by those who wanted to avoid giving smaller states a disproportionately large influence on the election outcome. The Electoral College was thus established as a compromise between these two voting systems.
The Electoral College was also a compromise between free states and slave states. At the time of the Constitutional Convention, the northern and southern states had roughly equal populations. However, the southern states included a significant number of enslaved people, who were prohibited from voting. As such, delegates from the South objected to a direct popular vote in presidential elections, which would reduce their states' electoral representation. The Electoral College was devised to apply the three-fifths compromise, wherein three out of every five enslaved people were counted as part of a state's total population, thereby increasing the South's electoral advantage.
The Electoral College has been criticised for its potential to dilute the political power of minority voters. For example, Black voters are highly concentrated in the South, and their preferred presidential candidate often loses in their home states. This has led to concerns that the Electoral College undermines the principle of "one person, one vote". Additionally, the Electoral College has been criticised for its potential to diverge from the national popular vote, with several elections resulting in the winner of the Electoral College losing the popular vote.
The Long Road to Ratifying the Constitution
You may want to see also
The College's fairness is debated
The fairness of the Electoral College has been a matter of ongoing debate in the United States since its inception at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The College was established as a compromise between those who wanted Congress to select the president and those who wanted a direct nationwide popular vote.
Those who argue for the fairness of the Electoral College claim that it ensures large states do not dominate small ones in presidential elections, that it balances power between Congress and state legislatures, and that it provides checks and balances in the constitutional system. They also argue that it requires presidential candidates to have broad appeal across the country to win.
However, critics of the Electoral College argue that it is not representative of the popular will of the nation. They point to the inequity that, due to the distribution of electors, individual citizens in states with smaller populations have more voting power than those in larger states. This is because each state is entitled to at least three electors, regardless of its population. This has resulted in the runner-up of the nationwide popular vote being elected president on several occasions.
Critics also argue that the Electoral College dilutes the political power of Black voters. Because the concentration of Black people is highest in the South, their preferred presidential candidate often loses their home states' electoral votes. Additionally, critics note that the Electoral College allows for the possibility of faithless electors who vote against the popular vote winner in their states, potentially nullifying the popular vote.
The debate over the fairness of the Electoral College has become increasingly polarized, and attempts to reform or abolish it have been made for over two centuries, but the institution remains due to the difficulty of amending the US Constitution.
The Constitution's "Others": Who Are They?
You may want to see also
It dilutes the political power of Black voters
The Electoral College is a process established by the Founding Fathers in the US Constitution. It involves the selection of electors, who meet and vote for the President and Vice President, and the counting of electoral votes by Congress. The College comprises 538 electors, with each state allocated presidential electors equal to the number of its representatives and senators.
The College was designed to empower southern whites, and it continues to do so. This is because the concentration of Black people is highest in the South, and their preferred presidential candidate is almost certain to lose their home states' electoral votes. Despite Black voting patterns, five out of six states with Black populations of 25% or more have been reliably "red" in recent presidential elections. The Electoral College system means that Black votes are submerged, and their political power is diluted.
The majority of states use a “winner-take-all” system that awards all electors to the presidential candidate who wins the state's popular vote. This means that Black voters, who are often scattered throughout "red" states, see their ballots as less valuable and powerful than white people's. This dilutes the power of Black voters, and attempts to reform the Electoral College have stalled.
The Electoral College was established as a compromise between those who wanted Congress to select the President and those who favored a direct nationwide popular vote. It was also a compromise between large and small states, with each state having Electoral College votes proportional to the number of its senators and House members. However, critics argue that the College is no longer a constructive force in American politics and that it is time to move to the direct popular election of presidents.
Citing the US Constitution in APA Style: In-Text Guide
You may want to see also
Explore related products
It's a process, not a place
The Electoral College is a process, not a place. It is a method of selecting the President of the United States, established by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution.
The College is formed every four years and consists of 538 electors, who meet and vote for the President and Vice President. The number of electors from each state is equal to the number of its Congressional delegation, which is the number of Senators (two) plus the number of Representatives for that state. Each state is entitled to at least three electors.
The process involves the selection of electors, the meeting of electors, and the counting of electoral votes by Congress. The voters in each state choose electors to serve in the Electoral College, and the state executive of each state signs a Certificate of Ascertainment to appoint the electors. The electors then meet and vote for the President and Vice President. Finally, Congress meets in a joint session to count the electoral votes and declare the outcome of the election.
The Electoral College was established as a compromise between those who favoured election of the President by a vote in Congress, and those who preferred a popular vote of qualified citizens. The College was also a compromise between large and small states, with each state having Electoral College votes proportional to the number of its senators and House members. This was intended to prevent large states from dominating the smaller ones in presidential elections.
The Electoral College has been criticised for being unfair and for not truly reflecting the popular will of the nation. For example, it has been argued that it dilutes the political power of Black voters, as Black voters' preferred presidential candidates often lose their home states' electoral votes. The College has also been criticised for allowing "faithless electors", who vote against the popular vote winner in their states.
Citing the Constitution: A Comprehensive Guide
You may want to see also
The College's existence is due to the US Constitution being hard to amend
The Electoral College is a group of intermediaries designated by the US Constitution to select the president and vice president of the United States. The College was established as a compromise between those who wanted Congress to select the president and those who favoured a direct nationwide popular vote. The College's existence is due, in large part, to the US Constitution being hard to amend.
The US Constitution is notoriously difficult to amend. As a result, the Electoral College has remained in place despite its many critics. The College has been criticised since its inception, and the debate over its continued use has intensified in recent years. In 1969, an amendment to abolish the Electoral College was approved by the House but failed to pass the Senate.
The College was established at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, due in part to pressure from slave states wanting to increase their voting power. The three-fifths compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person when allocating electors, contributed to an "almost uninterrupted trend" of presidential election wins by southern slaveholders. This dynamic has been described as undermining representative democracy and the notion of "one person, one vote".
The College also gives disproportionate power to swing states and allows a handful of states to decide the presidential election. This has resulted in the runners-up of the nationwide popular vote being elected president on several occasions. The College's critics argue that it is no longer a constructive force in American politics and that it is time to move to a direct popular vote for presidents.
The College's defenders argue that it ensures all parts of the country are involved in selecting the president and that it protects the voices of the minority from being overwhelmed by the majority. They also argue that the College can preclude calls for recounts or demands for runoff elections, giving certainty to presidential elections. However, these arguments have been challenged, with critics pointing out that the College's defenders often rely on inaccurate history.
Meiji Constitution: Western Influence and Similarities
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The Electoral College is a group of intermediaries designated by the US Constitution to select the president and vice president of the United States. It is a process, not a place.
The Electoral College was chosen as a compromise between those who wanted Congress to select the president and those who wanted a direct nationwide popular vote. It was also a compromise between large and small states, as each state has Electoral College votes in proportion to the number of its senators and House members.
Critics argue that the Electoral College is not representative of the popular will of the nation. They also argue that it gives too much power to swing states, undermines representative democracy, and is rooted in slavery and racism.
Supporters argue that the Electoral College ensures that all parts of the country are involved in selecting the president and that it protects the voices of the minority. It also provides a check on large states dominating small ones in presidential elections and helps maintain stability by reducing the risk of recounts or runoff elections.
