Obamacare: Constitutional Or Amendment?

Colloquially known as Obamacare, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is a federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2010. It has been the subject of numerous political debates since its proposal, with opponents coining the term Obamacare as a pejorative. The act's constitutionality has been challenged several times, with a Texas judge ruling it unconstitutional in 2018. The Supreme Court upheld key provisions of the act in 2012, but its constitutionality was again questioned in 2017 when Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, eliminating the tax penalty that justified the individual mandate. The ongoing debate surrounding Obamacare has shifted from constitutionality to fiscal viability, with the Supreme Court yet again set to decide on its constitutionality.

Explore related products

U.S. Constitution: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$6.46

The Law of Healthcare Administration, Tenth Edition

$127.19

Healthcare Law and Ethics

$132.52 $133.32

The Law of Healthcare Administration, Ninth Edition (9)

$110.22 $132

The Law of Healthcare Administration, Eighth Edition (Aupha/Hap Book)

$116 $132

First Healthcare Compliance The Fundamentals, Second Edition

$49.99

The individual mandate

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, is a federal statute enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2010. The ACA's major provisions came into force in 2014, and by 2016, the uninsured share of the population was estimated to have halved, with an additional 20 to 24 million people covered.

The debate surrounding the individual mandate centres around the role of government in regulating the health insurance market and the balance between individual freedom and social welfare. Opponents of the mandate argue that it is an overreach of government power and an intrusion on individual liberty, while supporters argue that it is necessary to ensure affordable healthcare for all Americans.

The legal and political debate over the individual mandate continues, with some arguing for a revision of the ACA to make it fiscally viable, while others call for its repeal and replacement. The Supreme Court will likely have to rule again on the constitutionality of the ACA, particularly the individual mandate, in light of the changes to the tax law. The outcome of this ruling will have significant implications for the U.S. healthcare system and the millions of Americans who have gained health insurance coverage under the ACA.

Medicaid expansion

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, is a landmark federal statute in the US. It was enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2010. The ACA's major provisions came into force in 2014, and by 2016, the uninsured share of the population was roughly halved, with an additional 20 to 24 million people covered.

The ACA's Medicaid expansion expanded coverage to nearly all adults with incomes up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level ($21,597 for an individual in 2025) and provided states with an enhanced federal matching rate (FMAP) for their expansion populations. As of 2024, 40 states plus Washington, D.C., have adopted the expansion, with South Dakota and North Carolina being the most recent additions in 2023.

The expansion has produced net savings for many states as the federal government pays the majority of the cost of expansion coverage. As more people have gained coverage, hospitals' uncompensated care costs have fallen. Additionally, expansion has enabled states to spend less on programs for people with mental health or substance use disorders and has helped lower corrections spending as more incarcerated people became eligible for and enrolled in Medicaid.

However, the expansion of Medicaid under the ACA was deemed unconstitutional by a majority of judges in the 2012 Supreme Court Case National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) v. Sebelius. The court ruled that the Medicaid provision could survive, but the expansion was made optional for states as they had not received enough notice to consent to the change. As a result, some states have expanded their Medicaid programs, while others have not.

Even if a state has not expanded Medicaid, individuals who appear to have an income below the level to qualify for financial help with a Marketplace plan should still fill out a Marketplace application. Each state has coverage options that could work, particularly if the individual has children, is pregnant, or has a disability.

Obamacare's fiscal viability

Obamacare, formally known as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2010. The ACA made significant changes to federal programs and tax policies regarding healthcare, including insurance coverage, affordability, accessibility, financing, and the operation of Medicare.

The ACA's fiscal framework has been criticised for relying on subsidies and taxes under pressure. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the ACA would cost $1 trillion in marketplace subsidies over the next decade, driven by rising premiums and enrollment. These subsidies are in the form of premium tax credits, which artificially increase demand and support for the ACA by masking the true cost of insurance. These tax credits are available to incomes between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level. Without these tax subsidies, the average family of four would pay $27,025 for health insurance in 2024, and if they expire in 2025 as planned, 2.2 million people will lose coverage in 2026.

The ACA's risk-pooling mechanisms and individual mandate require younger, healthier individuals to subsidise older, high-risk populations, inflating premiums for those with limited financial resources. This intergenerational transfer has been criticised for prioritising immediate social benefits over long-term fiscal sustainability, potentially jeopardising future benefits for younger people. For example, older adults (65+) spent $11,300 annually per capita on healthcare, compared to $2,000 for children and $4,500 for young adults, according to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker. The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) pushed for a 2:1 ratio between older and younger enrollees' premiums, but the final compromise was set at 3:1, still capping older enrollees' premiums at three times those of younger ones.

However, the CBO has also estimated that the ACA will reduce the deficit by an average of 0.5% of GDP each year from 2023 to 2032, corresponding to a total deficit reduction of $1.6 trillion over that period. Economic research also shows that an increasing fraction of premium savings is passed on to workers in the form of higher wages. Furthermore, by giving families more options for obtaining affordable health insurance outside the workplace, the ACA will encourage entrepreneurship and make it easier for people to take time off work to raise a family or retire.

Explore related products

Legal Aspects of Health Care Administration

$91.25 $104.95

The Law of American Health Care (Aspen Casebook)

$190 $359

Health Care Ethics and the Law: .

$125 $110.95

Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Healthcare Professionals: .

$68.12 $126.95

Healthcare Technology Law and Compliance

$32.41 $39.99

Problems in Health Care Law: .

$38 $186.95

The Supreme Court's 2012 ruling

In 2012, the Supreme Court heard arguments in three cases concerning the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. The Court's decision to uphold the ACA was a victory for President Obama and Congressional Democrats, affirming the central legislative achievement of Mr. Obama's presidency.

The Court ruled that the individual mandate was constitutional under Congress's taxation power. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., joined by the court's four more liberal members, agreed that the requirement to obtain insurance or pay a penalty was authorized by Congress's power to levy taxes. In the majority opinion, Chief Justice Roberts wrote, "The Affordable Care Act's requirement that certain individuals pay a financial penalty for not obtaining health insurance may reasonably be characterized as a tax. Because the Constitution permits such a tax, it is not our role to forbid it, or to pass upon its wisdom or fairness."

However, the Court also substantially limited the law's expansion of Medicaid. Seven justices agreed that Congress had exceeded its authority by coercing states to participate in the expansion under threat of losing existing federal payments. To address this, the Court ruled that the Medicaid provision could survive if the Health and Human Services Secretary had limited power to enforce the law, effectively making the expansion optional for states.

The 2012 ruling was not the end of the legal challenges to the ACA, as subsequent cases have continued to shape the implementation and interpretation of the law. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court's decision in 2012 was a significant moment in the history of the ACA, ensuring that millions of Americans gained access to affordable health coverage.

The American Health Care Act

Obamacare, formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), is a landmark federal statute in the US. It was enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010.

The AHCA would have made significant changes to the ACA. For example, it would have eliminated funding for the Prevention and Public Health Fund after FY2018, which provides for investment in prevention and public health programs to improve health and restrain the growth of healthcare costs. The AHCA also would have increased funding for community health centers and made changes to the Medicaid program, including limiting the state option for a participating provider hospital to determine an individual's Medicaid eligibility preliminarily.

One of the key concerns with the AHCA was that the tax credits funded at the proposed level in the bill would be insufficient to pay for individual insurance, potentially leading to Americans dropping out of the healthcare market. The bill's elimination of the ACA's community rating provision, which barred insurance companies from charging older people more than three times what they charge younger people, was also criticised for potentially increasing cost disparities between age groups and premiums for Americans more prone to illness.

The AHCA also faced opposition from various healthcare organisations, conservative groups, and progressive groups. Despite the concerns and opposition, the bill narrowly passed in the House, but ultimately failed in the Senate, preserving the Affordable Care Act.

Frequently asked questions