The Process Of Amending The Constitution Explained

The process of amending the US Constitution is outlined in Article V of the Constitution. It involves a proposal stage and a ratification stage. Amendments may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. The proposal is then ratified and becomes part of the Constitution once approved by three-quarters of the states, either in their state legislatures or at ratifying conventions. This process has been used 33 times since 1789, with 27 amendments successfully ratified. The amendment process is intentionally difficult, ensuring stability and permanence in the Constitution.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$103.22 $150

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.18

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.34 $45

Article V outlines the process

Article V establishes two methods for proposing amendments: the first is for two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate to pass a joint resolution, and the second is for two-thirds of state legislatures to request that Congress call a constitutional convention. Importantly, the President has no constitutional role in the amendment process, and their approval is not required for a proposed amendment.

Once an amendment has been proposed, it is submitted to the states for ratification. Congress determines whether ratification must be through state legislatures or ratifying conventions, and three-quarters of states must ratify the amendment for it to become part of the Constitution. This process has been utilised 33 times since 1789, with 27 amendments successfully ratified.

The amendment process was intentionally designed to be difficult by the Framers of the Constitution to ensure stability in the United States. As a result, amendments are usually only pursued for significant changes affecting all Americans or securing citizens' rights.

Amendments proposed by Congress

The authority to amend the US Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution. Amendments may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Since 1789, Congress has sent 33 constitutional amendments to the states for ratification, of which 27 have been ratified. The first 10 amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were ratified in 1791.

• The 1789 Joint Resolution of Congress, which includes provisions such as the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and the preservation of the right to trial by jury.
• The Dueling Ban Amendment, proposed in 1838 after Representative William Graves killed Representative Jonathan Cilley in a duel. This amendment would have prohibited anyone involved in a duel from holding federal office.
• An amendment abolishing the Senate, proposed by Representative Victor Berger in 1911 due to his belief that it was corrupt and useless.
• An anti-miscegenation amendment was proposed by Representative Seaborn Roddenbery, a Southern Democrat from Georgia, in 1912, to forbid interracial marriages nationwide.
• The Christian Amendment, first proposed in February 1863, would have added an acknowledgment of the Christian God to the Preamble to the Constitution. Similar amendments were proposed in 1874, 1896, and 1910 but none passed.
• The Ludlow Amendment, proposed by Representative Louis Ludlow in 1937, would have required a national referendum to confirm any declaration of war, significantly reducing America's ability to engage in war.

Ratification by three-fourths of states

The process of amending the US Constitution is outlined in Article V of the Constitution. This article describes a two-step process: proposing an amendment, and ratification.

The first step of proposing an amendment can be done in two ways: by Congress, with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures.

The second step, ratification, can also be achieved in two ways: by a three-fourths majority of state legislatures, or by ratifying conventions in three-fourths of states. This second method has only been used once in US history, for the Twenty-First Amendment in 1933.

The ratification process is administered by the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist's role is to certify that an amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is then published in the Federal Register and US Statutes at Large, serving as official notice to Congress and the nation that the amendment process is complete.

The process of amending the Constitution was established at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which took place in Philadelphia. The convention was influenced by English common law and Enlightenment liberalism, and the Constitution's first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers.

The process of ratification by three-fourths of states is a key part of the amendment process. This method of ratification gives each state an equal vote, regardless of its population or length of time in the Union. This ensures that smaller states have a proportional say in the amendment process, and that amendments reflect the interests of a majority of states.

The process of submitting ratification documents is managed by the Office of the Federal Register (OFR), which examines documents for facial legal sufficiency and an authenticating signature. Once the OFR has verified that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify. This certification is a final and conclusive step in the amendment process.

In summary, ratification by three-fourths of states is a crucial part of the US Constitution amendment process. It involves a majority of states ratifying a proposed amendment, either through their legislatures or through ratifying conventions. The process is managed by the Archivist of the United States and the OFR, who ensure the validity and authenticity of ratification documents. This method of ratification gives each state an equal say in the amendment process, protecting the interests of smaller states.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$16.7 $26.99

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy

$12.65 $27.95

The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution

$16.69 $17.95

Perfecting the U.S. Constitution: 27 and Counting, The Amendments that Shaped America’s Future (Anthem Studies in Law Reform, 1)

$19.99 $90

The President's non-involvement

Article V of the United States Constitution, which outlines the procedure for altering the Constitution, does not include the President in the process. The Article states that amendments may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. This convention option has never been used, with all amendments originating in Congress.

Once an amendment is approved by Congress, it does not require presidential approval before being sent to the states for ratification. This is in contrast to Article I, Section 7, which states that federal legislation must be presented to the President for signature or veto before becoming law. The Supreme Court affirmed in Hollingsworth v. Virginia (1798) that constitutional amendments do not need to be placed before the President for approval or veto.

The process of amending the Constitution is intentionally difficult, as the Framers of the Constitution wanted to ensure its longevity. In over 230 years, there have only been 27 amendments. The President's non-involvement in the process contributes to this difficulty, as it removes any potential influence the executive branch may have on the amendment process.

The role of the President in amending the Constitution is limited to their influence as a political leader, as they may endorse or support certain amendments. However, officially, the President has no constitutional role or function in the process of amending the Constitution.

Difficulty of amending Constitution

The United States Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come". To ensure its longevity, the framers made it a challenging task to amend the document. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, demonstrating the difficulty of the process.

Amending the Constitution is a complex and time-consuming process. Firstly, a proposed amendment must be passed by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. This first method has been used for all 33 amendments submitted to the states for ratification. The second method, the convention option, has yet to be invoked. Once an amendment is approved by Congress, it does not require presidential approval before being sent to the states.

The proposed amendment is then submitted to the states for their consideration. For an amendment to become part of the Constitution, it must be ratified by three-quarters of the state legislatures or ratifying conventions. This step can be challenging, as each state's vote carries equal weight, and reaching a consensus across a large number of states can be difficult.

The difficulty of amending the Constitution is further highlighted by the fact that in the last half-century, democratic reformers have proposed thousands of amendments to make the Constitution more equal, inclusive, and just, yet none have been successful. This rigidity has been a cause for concern, as it has prevented the Constitution from being renovated to reflect modern values and needs.

While some argue that the Constitution should be easier to amend, others believe that the current process strikes a balance between ensuring the Constitution is not too mutable while also allowing for necessary changes.

Frequently asked questions