Can Muslims Hold Office? A Constitutional Question

Following the election of Muslim politicians such as Ilhan Omar, Keith Ellison, and Andre Carson, claims have circulated on social media that the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 bars Muslims from holding public office in the United States. This claim is false and constitutionally illegal. The Act upheld a controversial quota system for immigration by nationality, not religion, and did not pertain to the suitability of any person to hold public office. Furthermore, Article VI of the US Constitution clearly states that no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States, protecting the freedom of religion.

Explore related products

Religion and the Constitution (Aspen Casebook)

$190 $359

Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution, & Religion

$11.37 $12.99

Religion, Law, and the Constitution (Concepts and Insights)

$60 $60

Christianity and the Constitution: The Faith of Our Founding Fathers

$31.14 $45

Constitution & Religion: Leading Supreme Court Cases on Church and State

$85.99

The American Constitution and Religion

$0.5 $19.99

The McCarran-Walter Act of 1952

The McCarran-Walter Act, also known as the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, was enacted by the 82nd United States Congress as the H.R. 5678 bill. The legislation was sponsored by Democratic Senator Pat McCarran of Nevada and Democratic Congressman Francis Walter of Pennsylvania. The Act, which came into effect on June 27, 1952, solidified more restrictive immigration movement into the United States.

The McCarran-Walter Act abolished the "alien ineligible to citizenship" category from US immigration law, which previously applied only to people of Asian descent. It also repealed the remaining measures that excluded Asian immigration, allotting a minimum quota of 100 visas per year to each Asian nation and eliminating laws that prevented Asians from becoming naturalized American citizens. The Act, however, retained a quota system for nationalities and regions, with a preference system that determined which ethnic groups were desirable immigrants. This preference system prioritized individuals with special skills, families already in the US, and those with economic potential, skills, and education.

The Act also introduced the concept of "good moral character" as a requirement for naturalization, which was measured by a person's ability to behave morally and honor the Constitution and laws of the United States. This idea of "good moral character" was not new and dated back to the Naturalization Act of 1790.

It is important to note that the claim that the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 bars Muslims from holding public office in the United States is false. The Act did not ban specific religious groups from public office but focused on immigration and visa processes. The Constitution is clear on the impermissibility of imposing religious requirements on those seeking public office, as stated in Article VI: "No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

Muslims in US Congress

It is not constitutionally illegal for a Muslim to hold office in the United States. The US Constitution is clear on the impermissibility of imposing religious requirements on those seeking public office. Article VI of the Constitution states: "No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." This means that a person can hold office regardless of their faith.

In 2018, following Muslim politician Ilhan Omar's win in a Democratic primary for Minnesota's Fifth Congressional District, references to the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 began circulating on social media, claiming that it barred Muslims from holding public office. This claim is false. The act did discriminate by race and ethnicity, upholding a controversial quota system for immigration, but it did not place any religious restrictions on who could hold elected office.

In 2021, Ilhan Omar from Minnesota and Rashida Tlaib from Michigan became the first two Muslim women to be elected to the US House of Representatives. They joined one Muslim Congressman who was re-elected in November. As of 2023, there are no Muslims among the freshmen members of Congress, but all the Muslims in Congress are Democrats.

The Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) is a nonprofit organization working to increase understanding and improve policies that impact American Muslims. MPAC provides an American Muslim perspective on important policy developments and advocates for comprehensive immigration reform rooted in American principles of justice, liberty, and equality.

US Constitution and freedom of religion

The First Amendment of the US Constitution has two provisions concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing a religion. In the past, this meant prohibiting state-sponsored churches, such as the Church of England. Today, what constitutes an "establishment of religion" is often governed under the three-part test set forth by the US Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman. The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion, so long as it does not conflict with "public morals" or a "compelling" government interest. For example, in Prince v. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court ruled that a state could require the inoculation of children, even if their parents objected for religious reasons, because the state had an overriding interest in protecting public health and safety.

Article VI of the US Constitution also explicitly states that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States". This means that a person can hold office regardless of their faith. This is further supported by the First Amendment, which guarantees the free exercise of religion.

Despite this constitutional guarantee of religious freedom, there have been claims that the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 bars Muslims from holding public office. This claim gained traction following the election of Muslim politicians Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib to the US House of Representatives in 2021. However, this claim is false. The Act upheld a controversial quota system for immigration first established in 1924 and allowed the US to deny citizenship to persons belonging to organizations deemed to be a threat to the government. It did not ban specific religious groups from public office and had no religious restrictions on who could hold elected office. The erroneous claim that the Act banned Muslims from holding office stems from a misinterpretation of its provisions and a failure to understand the distinction between religious and national identities.

Explore related products

Religion and the Constitution (Aspen Casebook)

$100 $271

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Godless Constitution: A Moral Defense of the Secular State

$21.95

The Separation of Church and State: Writings on a Fundamental Freedom by America's Founders

$21

Sex and the Constitution: Sex, Religion, and Law from America's Origins to the Twenty-First Century

$19.83 $35

Religion and the Constitution, Volume 2: Establishment and Fairness

$47 $47

Fake news on social media

Fake news is a pervasive issue on social media, with false narratives and misleading information spreading rapidly through these platforms. One such instance of fake news centres on the topic of whether Muslims are constitutionally barred from holding office in the United States. This claim has been circulated on social media platforms, particularly Facebook, and has taken various forms.

One version of this false narrative revolves around the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, also known as the Immigration and Nationality Act. This Act has been incorrectly cited as proof that Muslims are legally prohibited from holding public office in the United States. Following the election of Muslim politicians like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib to the U.S. House of Representatives, social media posts asserted that the McCarran-Walter Act was a 1952 law that banned Muslims from holding office.

However, this claim has been thoroughly debunked by fact-checking organisations and legal experts. The McCarran-Walter Act did uphold a controversial quota system for immigration based on race and ethnicity, but it did not impose any religious restrictions on holding elected office. The Act was concerned with foreign nationals seeking visas or entry into the United States and had no bearing on the suitability of American citizens for public office, regardless of their religious affiliation.

Furthermore, the notion that Muslims are constitutionally barred from holding office contradicts the United States Constitution. Article VI of the Constitution explicitly states, "No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." This clause ensures that individuals cannot be prevented from holding office based on their religious beliefs, which aligns with the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion.

Despite the refutations by fact-checkers and the clear constitutional protections, the false narrative about Muslims being banned from holding office persists on social media. This underscores the challenges of combating fake news in the digital age, where misinformation can spread rapidly and influence public discourse and perceptions. It also highlights the importance of critical thinking, fact-checking, and media literacy in navigating the information landscape.

US Supreme Court rulings

There is no US Supreme Court ruling that bans Muslims from holding office in the United States. The First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, and there is no federal law that would keep people of the Islamic faith from serving in public office.

The US Constitution is clear on the impermissibility of imposing religious requirements on those seeking public office. Article VI states: "No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." This means that a person can hold office regardless of their faith.

In 2018, following Muslim politician Ilhan Omar's win in a Democratic primary for Minnesota's Fifth Congressional District, references to the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 (also known as the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952) began appearing on social media in support of the claim that Muslims were barred from holding public office in the US. This claim was quickly debunked by fact-checking organizations, who pointed out that the Act did not ban specific religious groups from public office but rather upheld a quota system limiting immigration by country.

The Supreme Court has never upheld any law that would disallow Muslims from participating in American government. In fact, there have been several Muslim politicians elected to office in the US, including Democratic Reps. Keith Ellison of Minnesota and Andre Carson of Indiana, as well as Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, who became the first two Muslim women in Congress in 2021.

Frequently asked questions