Ferpa: Constitutional Right Or Congressional Act?

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a United States federal law that protects the privacy of personally identifiable information in a student's education record. FERPA, also known as the Buckley Amendment, became law in November 1974. The Act has faced criticism for concealing non-educational public records and has been deemed coercive and unconstitutional. This has led to discussions on replacing the statute with a more sensible version. With this context, the question of whether FERPA is part of the Constitution arises.

Explore related products

FERPA Clear and Simple: The College Professional's Guide to Compliance

$48 $48

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $14.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Know Your Bill of Rights Workbook: Don't Lose Your Constitutional Rights--Learn Them!

$14.99

Navigating Choppy Waters

$39 $115

The Know Your Bill of Rights Book: Don't Lose Your Constitutional Rights--Learn Them!

$14.99 $14.95

FERPA, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, is a federal law that protects the privacy of students' educational records

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, commonly known as the Buckley Amendment, is a federal law in the United States that protects the privacy of students' educational records. It grants parents access to their child's educational records and gives them the right to request amendments. The law also controls the disclosure of information from these records, requiring the consent of students over the age of 18 in most cases. FERPA applies to educational institutions that receive funding from the US Department of Education, including public schools and the majority of private institutions.

FERPA was enacted in November 1974 to protect the privacy of personally identifiable information in a student's educational record. It serves a twofold purpose: granting parents and students aged 18 and older access to the student's educational record, and protecting that information from unauthorized disclosure to third parties without parental or eligible student consent. FERPA also permits schools to disclose personally identifiable information from the educational records of "eligible students" (those aged 18 or older or enrolled in a postsecondary institution at any age) to their parents if the student is a dependent.

While the original goal of the law was to protect the privacy of student files, FERPA has been amended and interpreted numerous times, making it challenging to determine exactly what information is protected as part of an educational record. A record is considered part of an "education record" under FERPA if it "directly relates" to a student and is "maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a person acting for such agency or institution."

FERPA has faced criticism for concealing non-educational public records, and some argue that it is unconstitutional due to its coercive requirements. However, it is important to note that FERPA does not require or recognize audits or certifications, and educational institutions must assess for themselves how their practices align with FERPA requirements.

FERPA grants parents access to their child's educational records and the right to request changes

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA), also known as the Buckley Amendment, is a federal law that governs access to educational information and records by public entities. FERPA grants parents access to their child's educational records and the right to request changes. This includes the right to inspect and review their child's records, and to request amendments if the information is inaccurate, misleading, or violates the child's privacy rights.

FERPA also allows for the disclosure of personally identifiable information from a student's records to their parents if the student is a dependent, as defined in Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code. This typically applies if either parent has claimed the student as a dependent on their most recent U.S. Federal income tax return. In such cases, the school may disclose the student's records without the student's consent.

FERPA's primary purpose is to protect the privacy of students' educational records and to regulate access and disclosure of this information. The law applies to any educational institution that receives federal funding, including public and private schools, as well as post-secondary institutions. It is important to note that FERPA does not cover all records or information related to students, but specifically focuses on educational activity.

While FERPA grants parents access to their child's educational records, it has faced criticism for concealing non-educational public records. Additionally, the law has been deemed coercive and potentially unconstitutional due to its requirement that schools enforce the confidentiality of "education records" or risk losing federal funding. Despite these concerns, FERPA remains in place and continues to shape the way educational institutions handle student privacy and parental access to records.

FERPA controls the disclosure of student information to third parties, with consent generally required after a student turns 18

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974 is a federal law that governs the access to educational information and records by public entities, such as potential employers, publicly funded educational institutions, and foreign governments. FERPA also regulates the disclosure of student education records. It grants parents access to their child's records, allows amendments, and controls disclosure.

FERPA applies to any educational institution that receives federal funding, including all public schools and most private institutions. The law also applies to institutions receiving funds from the U.S. Department of Education. Under FERPA, schools are required to maintain a list of all individuals or organizations that have requested or obtained a student's education records. These records can only be accessed by the parent or eligible student, the school official responsible for education records, and authorized auditing personnel. Third parties who obtain access to student education records must agree not to disclose the information to anyone else without the written consent of the parent or eligible student.

While FERPA provides important privacy protections for students and their parents, it has also faced criticism and legal challenges. Some argue that FERPA is too broad and coercive, threatening schools and colleges with the loss of federal funding if they do not comply with the confidentiality of "education records". There are concerns that this has led to the over-classification of records as FERPA records, potentially restricting the flow of information and causing issues with transparency. Additionally, amendments to FERPA in 2008 and 2011 have been criticized for causing a loss of control over student information, leading to concerns about educational data flowing unrestricted to third parties.

Explore related products

The United States Constitution: What It Says, What It Means: A Hip Pocket Guide

$5.99

The Constitution of the United States of America, with the Bill of Rights and all of the Amendments; The Declaration of Independence; and the Articles of Confederation

$4.5 $17.99

US Constitution: Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, & Amendments

$7.64 $7.64

Constitution of the United States (Books of American Wisdom)

$9.25 $9.95

The Constitution and the Declaration of Independence: The Constitution of the United States of America

$9.99 $9.99

Patrick's Corner

$11.99 $17.99

FERPA has been criticised for concealing non-educational public records

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974, also known as the Buckley Amendment, is a US federal law that governs access to educational information and records by public entities. It grants parents access to their child's records, allows amendments, and controls disclosure. FERPA has been criticised for being used to conceal non-educational public records.

FERPA has been criticised for its broad interpretation, which has led to the concealment of non-educational public records. While the original goal of the law was to protect the privacy of student files, the Act has been amended and interpreted so many times that it is now difficult to determine exactly what information is and is not protected as part of an education record. Schools and colleges often cite FERPA as a reason to deny requests for public records, even when they are unrelated to a student's educational life. This has resulted in the withholding of information such as parking tickets issued to student athletes and the minutes of public committee meetings.

The Act's primary Senate sponsor has criticised the use of FERPA to conceal public records that are not educational in nature. In the Owasso Independent School District v. Falvo case, the debate centred on the relationship between peer-grading and "education records" as defined by FERPA. The plaintiffs argued that allowing students to grade each other's tests and hear the correct answers from teachers embarrassed children, but the court ruled that peer grading constituted an "education record" under FERPA, and therefore, peer-grading violated FERPA privacy policies.

FERPA has also been criticised for its coercive nature, threatening schools and colleges with the loss of federal funding if they do not comply with the confidentiality of "education records". This has led to institutions over-classifying records as FERPA records to avoid financial penalties, further contributing to the concealment of non-educational public records.

To address these concerns, it has been suggested that Congress and the US Department of Education should work on a replacement statute that focuses on the academic and disciplinary records that FERPA's authors originally intended to protect. This would exclude records such as parking tickets, tapes of student senate meetings, and misconduct complaints against administrators. Additionally, a dispute-resolution process should be implemented for those affected by the misclassification of public documents as "confidential education records", with severe financial penalties for the frivolous misuse of FERPA.

FERPA's requirements have been deemed unconstitutional and coercive, threatening financial penalties for non-compliance

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA), also known as the Buckley Amendment, is a federal law in the United States that governs access to educational records and information by public entities. The law grants parents access to their child's educational records, allowing them to request amendments and control disclosure. Once a student turns 18 or attends a post-secondary institution, they become an "eligible student" and the rights under FERPA transfer from the parent to the student.

While FERPA provides important privacy rights to students and parents, its requirements have faced significant criticism and have been deemed unconstitutional and coercive. The law mandates that educational institutions enforce the confidentiality of "education records" or risk losing federal funding. This "all-or-nothing" approach has been compared to a "gun to the head," threatening schools and colleges with severe financial consequences if they do not comply. The Student Press Law Center argues that the financial threat posed by FERPA is even more offensive to the Constitution than the Medicaid expansion in President Obama's health law.

The coercive nature of FERPA's requirements has been widely discussed. Schools and colleges are incentivized to over-classify records as FERPA records to avoid the risk of financial ruin. This has led to concerns about the over-classification of public documents as "confidential education records." The law has also been criticized for concealing non-educational public records, leading to a lack of transparency.

In the case of Owasso Independent School District v. Falvo, FERPA's interpretation of "education records" was challenged. The case centered around peer-grading and whether it violated FERPA privacy policies. The Court of Appeals ruled that peer-grading constituted an "education record," and the disclosure of academic performance to other students without full consent was a violation of FERPA. This case highlights the complexities and interpretations of FERPA's requirements, which can have significant implications for educational institutions.

Despite the criticisms and concerns surrounding FERPA's constitutionality, as of 2024, there have been no reported cases of penalties for violating the statute. However, if such a case were to occur, legal experts predict that FERPA would be voided due to its impermissible use of federal Spending Clause power.

Frequently asked questions