Addressing Internet Crime: Strategies For Global Diplomacy

The internet has become a key arena for geopolitical battles, with state and non-state actors using it for manipulation, fraud, extortion, data theft, and money laundering. This has led to a rise in cybercrime and cyber-attacks, such as WannaCry, which cost an estimated $4 billion. As a result, cyber issues have become a critical part of foreign policy, with over 25 countries creating offices dedicated to cyber issues within their foreign ministries. Cyber diplomacy has emerged as an international practice, aiming to bridge the national interests of states with world society dynamics. While initiatives such as the Paris Call for Trust and Security in Cyberspace and the EU's cyber diplomacy toolbox aim to prevent and respond to malicious behaviour in cyberspace, the need for international cooperation to counter cyber threats and advance internet freedom is clear.

Explore related products

THE PRECINCT GAME GUIDE: Master Crime-Fighting Strategies: A Comprehensive Walkthrough of Averno City's Police Procedures, Combat Tactics, and Investigations.

$17.99 $17.99

The CS Detective: An Algorithmic Tale of Crime, Conspiracy, and Computation

$17.28 $19.99

Cyber Risk Management in Practice (Security, Audit and Leadership Series)

$140 $59.99

New Solutions for Cybersecurity (Mit Connection Science & Engineering)

$24.49

The Internet of Things in the Defence Industry: Challenges and Solutions for Military Security

$114.27 $115

New Crimes and New Solutions: International Journal of Criminology

$9.99 $11.14

Internet censorship and taxation

Internet censorship is the legal control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. The extent of internet censorship varies from country to country. While some countries have moderate internet censorship, others go as far as to limit access to information such as news and suppress and silence discussions among citizens. Internet censorship may also be implemented in response to or in anticipation of events such as elections, protests, and riots.

Censorship is most often applied to specific internet domains, but it may also extend to all internet resources located outside the jurisdiction of the censoring state. Internet censorship may also put restrictions on what information can be made internet-accessible. Organizations providing internet access, such as schools and libraries, may choose to block access to material that they consider undesirable, offensive, age-inappropriate, or even illegal. They may view this as ethical behavior rather than censorship.

Blocking and filtering can be based on relatively static blacklists or be determined more dynamically based on a real-time examination of the information being exchanged. Blacklists may be produced manually or automatically and are often not available to non-customers of the blocking software. Blocking or filtering can occur at a centralized national level, a decentralized sub-national level, or at an institutional level, such as in libraries, universities, or internet cafes. Countries may filter sensitive content on an ongoing basis and/or introduce temporary filtering during key time periods such as elections.

The perception of internet censorship in the US is largely based on the First Amendment and the right to expansive free speech and access to content without regard to the consequences. While the free speech provisions of the First Amendment bar federal, state, and local governments from directly censoring the Internet, there are exceptions, such as with obscenity, including child pornography. Corporations may also choose to limit the content they make available on the Internet or be required by law or court order to remove or limit access to content that is judged to be obscene, harmful to children, defamatory, a threat to national security, promoting illegal activities, defamatory, or inciting violence.

Regarding internet taxation, some, such as U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, have argued that the internet should be free of taxation, censorship, and regulation. Cruz criticized the Obama administration's net neutrality regulations, stating that they threatened the freedom that has allowed the internet to flourish by placing the internet under outdated public utility regulations that give unelected bureaucrats sweeping powers over the internet.

Cyber diplomacy and international cooperation

Cyber diplomacy is a critical tool in dealing with the evolving dangers and possibilities of the digital era's cybersecurity landscape. It involves the application of diplomatic techniques and negotiations in international relations to address and regulate cyberspace-related issues. The importance of cyber diplomacy and international cooperation in addressing cybercrime and bolstering cybersecurity cannot be overstated.

The global digital economy is vulnerable to catastrophic cyberattacks without increased international cooperation. Governments, global industries, and experts from academia and civil society must work together to prevent cyberwarfare, restrict offensive cyber operations by non-state actors, and mitigate the economic threats posed by ICTs to the global economy. The relationship between the United States and Russia, for instance, is crucial in the cyber policy and diplomacy ecosystem, and disagreements between the two countries have hindered progress in establishing cyber rules for responsible state behaviour.

To effectively combat cyber threats, cyber diplomacy promotes cooperation between governments and private corporations, as the private sector plays a significant role in cyberspace. Public-private collaborations facilitate the exchange of knowledge and experience in cybersecurity. Additionally, cyber diplomacy promotes capacity building in developing nations by sharing expertise, training, and technology transfer to enhance their cybersecurity skills and strengths.

International cooperation in cyber diplomacy has been gaining momentum. Notable efforts include the United Nations' open-ended intergovernmental expert group on cybercrime, the United States Department of State's report on 'International Norms for State Behaviour in Cyberspace', and the European Union's 2021 strategy on cybersecurity. These initiatives, along with the contributions of non-governmental organisations and businesses, demonstrate a growing recognition of the importance of international cooperation in addressing cybercrime and strengthening cybersecurity.

In conclusion, cyber diplomacy and international cooperation are essential in addressing the complex and evolving challenges of cybercrime. Through collaboration between governments, industries, and experts, we can mitigate the impact of cyber threats and work towards a more secure cyberspace. By promoting capacity building, sharing knowledge, and advancing human rights and fair economic access online, we can create a safer and more resilient digital environment for all.

Role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and think tanks

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are independent, typically non-profit organizations that operate outside of government control. They often focus on humanitarian or social issues, and some examples include Amnesty International, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and Anti-Slavery International. NGOs play a crucial role in addressing internet crime by advocating for human rights, social justice, and security. They work collaboratively with other organizations and stakeholders to build trust, foster dialogue, and promote transparency and accountability.

Think tanks, on the other hand, are institutions affiliated with universities, foundations, or advocacy groups that generate policy research. They provide analysis and advice to governments and intergovernmental bodies, such as the United Nations and the European Union. Think tanks, such as the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, conduct research and develop policies to address societal problems at the local, national, and global levels.

NGOs and think tanks both contribute to fixing internet crime diplomacy by engaging in Track II diplomacy. This form of diplomacy involves experts, scientists, and professors who are not part of government affairs. It allows NGOs to build partnerships and engage in constructive dialogue with different actors to promote understanding and cooperation. Through their research and proposals, think tanks help governments and international organizations develop effective policies to combat internet crime and address its underlying causes.

Additionally, NGOs and think tanks work to prevent and mitigate the impact of internet crime by promoting digital security and cyber awareness. They educate individuals and organizations about the risks of cyber-enabled crimes and provide resources to protect themselves from online threats. By empowering people with knowledge and tools, they help to create a more resilient digital community that can better withstand and respond to cyber-attacks.

Overall, the role of NGOs and think tanks in fixing internet crime diplomacy is crucial. By advocating for human rights, conducting research, and engaging in Track II diplomacy, they contribute to the development of effective policies and strategies to address internet crime. Their collaborative and independent nature allows them to work across borders and sectors, bringing diverse stakeholders together to create a safer and more secure digital environment.

Explore related products

Security Solutions for Hyperconnectivity and the Internet of Things (Advances in Information Security, Privacy, and Ethics)

$215

Handbook of Research on Modern Cryptographic Solutions for Computer and Cyber Security

$305

Senior Cyber: Best Security Practices for Your Golden Years

$5.99 $14.95

System Forensics, Investigation, and Response (Information Systems Security & Assurance) (PAPERBACK BOOK ONLY) (Lab Access Code Sold Separately)

$26.99 $99.95

Computer Forensics: Investigating Network Intrusions and Cybercrime (CHFI), 2nd Edition

$73.51

Dark Web Investigation (Security Informatics and Law Enforcement)

$74.92 $109.99

Law enforcement and the FBI

The FBI, as the lead federal agency for investigating crime, plays a crucial role in addressing internet crime. The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) serves as the central hub for reporting cyber-enabled crimes, from fraud and scams to cyberattacks and threats of terrorism. IC3 provides a platform for individuals and organizations to file reports, sharing information with the FBI to aid in its investigations.

One of the key strengths of IC3 lies in its ability to combine data from various sources. By integrating the reported crimes with other data, the FBI gains valuable insights. They can investigate crimes, track trends and emerging threats, and even freeze stolen funds in certain cases. This data-driven approach enhances the FBI's capabilities in the digital realm, allowing them to stay ahead of the constantly evolving landscape of cybercrime.

To further strengthen their efforts, the FBI shares these reports throughout its network of field offices and collaborates with law enforcement partners. This collaboration ensures a robust collective response at both the local and national levels. The sheer volume of complaints received by IC3 each year presents a challenge, and while they may not respond directly to every submission, they assure the public that each report is taken seriously.

To effectively combat internet crime, the FBI and law enforcement must continue to prioritize cyber security. This includes investing in advanced technologies, enhancing information-sharing capabilities, and fostering strong partnerships with other agencies and countries. Additionally, public education and awareness play a vital role. By empowering individuals and organizations to take smart, reasonable steps to protect their devices and systems, the collective defense against cyber threats is strengthened.

Community education and protection

Firstly, raising awareness and educating the public about cyber threats and safe practices are essential. This includes teaching individuals how to identify and avoid potential scams, frauds, and other cyber-enabled crimes. It is important that people understand the risks associated with online activities, such as online banking, shopping, and social media usage. By empowering individuals with knowledge, they can better protect themselves and their devices from potential threats.

Additionally, promoting the use of secure technologies and practices can enhance community protection. This includes encouraging the adoption of strong passwords, two-factor authentication, secure network connections, and regular software updates to patch security vulnerabilities. Educating the community about the latest security tools and practices can create a collective sense of responsibility for cybersecurity.

Community education can also focus on identifying and reporting cyber-enabled crimes. Providing clear and accessible information on how and where to report incidents is crucial. This includes promoting resources like the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) in the United States, which serves as a central hub for reporting cyber-enabled crimes and is run by the FBI. By encouraging individuals to report their experiences, law enforcement can gather information, track trends, and respond more effectively to cyber threats.

Furthermore, fostering a sense of digital citizenship and responsibility within the community is important. This includes promoting ethical behaviour online, such as respecting privacy, combating cyberbullying, and refraining from engaging in or supporting illegal activities. Encouraging individuals to be vigilant and report any suspicious activities or content can also contribute to community protection.

Lastly, collaborating with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community groups can enhance community education and protection efforts. These organizations often have expertise in cyber practices and policies, and they can provide valuable resources, training, and support to local communities. By working together, communities can become more resilient to cyber threats and play an active role in addressing internet crime.

Through a combination of awareness campaigns, education initiatives, and the promotion of secure practices, communities can become better equipped to protect themselves from internet crime and contribute to the broader goals of cyber diplomacy.

Frequently asked questions