Freedom Of Speech: Constitutional Right To Expression

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, proposed on September 25, 1789, and ratified on December 15, 1791, is a cornerstone of free speech rights in the country. It prevents Congress from making laws that infringe on freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and the right to assemble and petition the government. While freedom of speech is considered a fundamental right in the US, it is not absolute and is subject to certain restrictions. The Supreme Court has also recognized that governments may impose reasonable limitations on the time, place, and manner of expression. The First Amendment's guarantee of free speech protects individuals from government censorship and interference, ensuring a robust and uninhibited debate on public issues.

Explore related products

The Four Freedoms of the First Amendment: A Textbook

$78

First Amendment (Examples & Explanations)

$50.09 $76.95

First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook)

$104 $314

A Short and Happy Guide to the First Amendment (Short and Happy Series)

$21

Exercising My 1st Amendment Rights (black text) Vinyl Decal Bumper Wall Laptop Window Sticker 5"

$4.95

First Amendment to The United States Constitution Text 18x15 Black Modern Framed Art Print: Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition from The U.S. Government Document Art Series

$54.99

The First Amendment

The Supreme Court of the United States has played a pivotal role in interpreting and safeguarding the First Amendment. In Thornhill v. Alabama (1940), the Court affirmed that freedom of speech and of the press encompass the liberty to discuss publicly and truthfully all matters of public concern without fear of punishment. The Court further emphasized the importance of uninhibited and robust debate on public issues in Bond v. Floyd (1966).

Freedom of religion

The First Amendment to the US Constitution, also known as the Bill of Rights, was added in 1791 and includes two provisions concerning freedom of religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause.

The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing a religion. The precise definition of "establishment" is unclear, but it has historically meant prohibiting state-sponsored churches, such as the Church of England. Today, the Supreme Court uses the three-part "Lemon" test to determine whether government action assists religion in an unconstitutional manner. Under the "Lemon" test, government assistance of religion is permitted only if: (1) its primary purpose is secular; (2) it neither promotes nor inhibits religion; and (3) there is no excessive entanglement between church and state.

The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion, or no religion at all, as they please, so long as it does not conflict with "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest. This clause upholds people's right to hold whichever religious beliefs they choose, including beliefs that fall outside of traditional theism. The Supreme Court has established that constitutional protections extend only to sincerely held religious beliefs and activities. In evaluating free exercise challenges, the Court may consider the sincerity of one's religious beliefs to ensure that they are not actually motivated by political, philosophical, or sociological ideologies.

Freedom of the press

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech and freedom of the press. It states that "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press". This amendment, authored by James Madison, was designed to safeguard individual liberties and restrict governmental power.

The freedom of the press is deeply rooted in the country's commitment to democracy and is considered a prerequisite for a free society. It functions as a limitation on government regulation and protects the public's right to receive information, particularly about government affairs and other matters of public concern. This right was established as a check on government power and is closely linked to the right to free speech.

The Supreme Court has interpreted the freedom of the press as protecting the media's function as a government watchdog. This interpretation has been reaffirmed through various Supreme Court cases, such as New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, where the Court determined that the constitutional rights to free speech and a free press extend to publishing false or libelous statements about public officials. The Court emphasised the importance of open discourse about the government and public affairs, stating that "debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and wide-open".

While the freedom of the press is essential, there have been debates about the extent of this freedom and whether it provides the institutional press with greater freedom from governmental regulations than non-press entities. Some argue that the press, due to its role in disseminating news and information, is entitled to deference that others are not. However, others, like Chief Justice Burger, concluded that the institutional press has no special privilege and is not entitled to treatment different from that of the general public.

In conclusion, the freedom of the press, as written in the First Amendment, plays a critical role in American society by ensuring a free flow of information, fostering open discourse, and holding the government accountable to its citizens.

Explore related products

Advanced Introduction to US First Amendment Law (Elgar Advanced Introductions series)

$25.45

The First Amendment: Cases and Theory (The Aspen Casebooks)

$225 $351

The First Amendment: Cases, Problems, and Materials, Sixth Edition

$158 $218

The Second Amendment

$4.99 $5.99

The First Amendment (Concepts and Insights)

$45 $60

The Constitution of the United States and Other Patriotic Documents

$21.99 $35

Freedom of assembly

The Constitution of the United States is interpreted to mean both the freedom to assemble and the freedom to join an association. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted on December 15, 1791, prevents Congress from making laws that prohibit the free exercise of religion or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. The First Amendment reads:

> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The right of petition took its rise from the provision made for it in the Magna Carta of 1215. The right of peaceable assembly is a cognate right to those of free speech and a free press and is considered equally fundamental. The Supreme Court has asserted a historical basis for the right of peaceable assembly for lawful purposes, stating that it is, and always has been, one of the attributes of citizenship under a free government.

The right of assembly protects the distinct interest in the holding of meetings for peaceable political action. This freedom ensures that individuals can gather together to advocate for causes, beliefs, movements, or protests. In American history, groups as diverse as union workers, civil rights advocates, anti-war demonstrators, and Ku Klux Klan members have assembled, taken to the streets, and broadcast their messages to the public.

• Universal Declaration of Human Rights – Article 20
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Article 21
• European Convention on Human Rights – Article 11
• American Convention on Human Rights – Article 15
• Constitution of Russia – Articles 30 and 31
• Constitution of Turkey – Articles 33 and 34
• Constitution of Bangladesh – Articles 37 and 38

Right to petition the government

In the United States, the right to freedom of speech and expression is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The right to petition the government, as outlined in the First Amendment, grants citizens the ability to formally complain to their government about issues they are facing and to request that the government take action to address these concerns. This right has been historically practised through petitions, which could be presented directly to Congress. Petitions would be reviewed, investigated, and responded to, with the possibility of a hearing or the petition being tabled. This process was open to everyone, including children, the foreign-born, African Americans, Native Americans, and women. For example, in the 18th century, a group of free African Americans in Philadelphia successfully petitioned Congress for greater regulation of the international slave trade.

The right to petition the government also includes the right to file a lawsuit against the government. This right to court access is guaranteed by the First Amendment, which states that citizens have the right "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." While this right is generally accepted, there is debate over whether this right extends to civil claims, particularly for poor plaintiffs who may be unable to pay court filing fees.

The Federal Tort Claims Act, enacted in the 1940s, restructured the petition process by shifting jurisdiction from Congress to the federal courts. This change made the process more direct, open, and creative, allowing citizens to approach Congress directly with their grievances. However, it is important to note that the modern equivalent of petitioning, the lobbying system, does not guarantee a response from Congress.

Frequently asked questions