The Unwritten Rules: Exploring Constitutional Flexibility

The question of whether a constitution needs to be a written document is a complex one. While some countries, such as the United States, have a long-standing written constitution, others, like the United Kingdom, do not have a single written text. The idea of a written constitution is often associated with the rule of law and considered foundational to it. In practice, all countries have a constitutional order, which includes a mixture of written documents, conventions, and common law. The purpose of a constitution is to protect civil and political rights, ensure stable institutions, and maintain public confidence and participation. While a written constitution can provide clarity and restrain the government, it is not a guarantee of stability or effectiveness, as the presence of active citizens is also necessary.

Explore related products

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$237.95 $359

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.38 $126.95

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Written constitutions can be unconstitutional if they are inconsistent with the constitutions of nature or society

The concept of a constitution has evolved over the centuries, with the earliest known code of justice issued by the Sumerian king Urukagina of Lagash, dating back to c. 2300 BC. Since then, the world has witnessed the adoption and subsequent amendments of close to 800 constitutions by independent states, with the United States Constitution being the oldest and shortest written constitution still in force.

While constitutions are meant to provide a framework for governance, they are not static documents. The interpretation and application of a constitution can be complex, and it may change over time as societies evolve. For instance, the United States Constitution, despite its venerated position, does not explicitly mention certain cherished concepts like the separation of powers and the rule of law. In such cases, legal scholars like Akhil Reed Amar argue that the understanding of a constitution lies not only within the written document but also in the values, precedents, and practices that complement and complete it.

This view aligns with Brownson's argument that a written constitution derives its legitimacy not solely from ratification but also from its competent design and application. Furthermore, Brownson asserts that a constitution can be deemed "unconstitutional" if its provisions are inconsistent with the constitutions of nature or society. This idea of a "constitution of society" refers to an unwritten and commonly understood set of rules that a society implicitly agrees upon through a social contract before establishing a formal government.

Therefore, for a written constitution to be legitimate and effective, it must not only be properly ratified but also designed and implemented in a way that aligns with the inherent nature and societal norms of the territory it governs. Deviating from these fundamental principles can render a written constitution inconsistent with the very fabric of the society it aims to govern, leading to its potential invalidation or rejection.

Written constitutions are important to maintain the distinction between the authority of the state and the government of the day

A constitution is the aggregate of fundamental principles or established precedents that constitute the legal basis of a country, organization, or other types of entities, and determines how that entity is to be governed. They can be written or unwritten. The UK, for example, has an uncodified constitution, written in numerous fundamental acts of legislature, court cases, and treaties.

Secondly, written constitutions provide a degree of permanence and stability to the system of government. They are more difficult to change or amend than unwritten constitutions, which are often based on conventions and practices that can evolve over time. This stability is important in maintaining the rule of law and ensuring that the government acts within the boundaries set out by the constitution. The US Constitution, for instance, has remained in force for several centuries, often without major revision for long periods.

Thirdly, written constitutions provide a legal rationale for the government's power and authority. This is especially important in situations where the government's legitimacy may be questioned or challenged. For example, the Instrument of Government, the first detailed written constitution adopted by a modern state, provided a legal basis for the increasing power of Oliver Cromwell after the English Parliament consistently failed to govern effectively.

Finally, written constitutions promote accountability and protect against government overreach. They provide a framework for the courts and the judiciary to operate independently and ensure that the government acts within the limits of its authority. Alexander Hamilton, in The Federalist Papers, explained that the federal courts "were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and their legislature" to ensure that the people's representatives acted only within the authority given to them by the Constitution.

Written constitutions are not the only factor in protecting civil and political rights, stable institutions, and public confidence

Written constitutions are essential in providing a framework for governance and outlining the rights and responsibilities of a nation's citizens. However, they are not the sole factor in safeguarding civil and political rights, achieving stable institutions, and fostering public confidence. While a written constitution is a crucial foundation, other factors come into play in ensuring a nation's success in these areas.

Firstly, the interpretation and implementation of the constitution are key. A constitution's effectiveness depends on the institutions tasked with upholding it. For example, an independent judiciary, as outlined in the US Constitution's concept of judicial review, plays a pivotal role in interpreting and enforcing constitutional rights. This check on legislative and executive powers helps protect civil liberties and maintain stable institutions.

Secondly, historical and cultural influences shape a constitution's effectiveness. For instance, the US Constitution was influenced by the Scottish Enlightenment, the writings of political philosophers like Hume and Locke, the Magna Carta, and English common law. Additionally, the Iroquois Confederacy's political concepts are argued to have influenced the structure and principles of the US Constitution. These influences demonstrate that a nation's history and cultural context play a significant role in shaping the understanding and application of constitutional principles.

Moreover, the process of amending a constitution is a critical factor. The US Constitution, for instance, is known for its difficulty to amend, which has resulted in the persistence of undemocratic institutions. On the other hand, the ease of amending a constitution can also be problematic, as it may lead to instability and uncertainty. A balance must be struck between adaptability and stability to ensure that a constitution can evolve with societal changes while maintaining a consistent framework that fosters public confidence.

Lastly, public confidence in a constitution is not solely derived from the document itself but also from the performance of the government and its adherence to constitutional principles. When a government upholds the rights and freedoms enshrined in the constitution and acts in the best interests of its citizens, public trust in the system is strengthened. This trust is further bolstered when governments address societal issues and respond to the needs and aspirations of their citizens.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28 $28

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$95 $345

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights (Examples & Explanations Series)

$76.95 $76.95

Written constitutions are not always effective in sustaining civil and political rights

The effectiveness of written constitutions in sustaining civil and political rights is a highly debated topic. While some argue that a written constitution is essential for establishing and protecting these rights, others claim that it is not a guarantee.

On the one hand, a written constitution provides a clear framework for governing a country and defining the rights of its citizens. It serves as a formal and explicit statement of the fundamental laws and principles that govern a nation, outlining the powers and limitations of the government and guaranteeing certain freedoms and liberties to individuals. For example, the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution explicitly protects citizens' rights, such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to bear arms.

However, the presence of a written constitution does not always ensure the protection of civil and political rights in practice. Historical and contemporary examples exist where written constitutions have failed to uphold these rights effectively. For instance, the French Constitution of 1791 lasted less than a year, and even well-established constitutions like the US Constitution have faced challenges in interpreting and enforcing certain rights, such as the ongoing debate over the Second Amendment.

Additionally, the effectiveness of a written constitution depends on various factors, including the specific content, the process of its creation, and the level of adherence to its principles. Brownson, for instance, argues that a written constitution's legitimacy stems not only from ratification but also from its competent design and application. The involvement of diverse stakeholders in the constitution-building process, such as through democratic and inclusive methods, can contribute to its effectiveness and sustainability.

Moreover, external factors can also influence the impact of a written constitution. For example, law enforcement measures and the authority of federal, state, and local governments play a crucial role in protecting constitutional rights, as noted by Harry S. Truman. Inadequacies in civil rights statutes and law enforcement capabilities can hinder the preservation of civil liberties, even when guaranteed by a written constitution.

In conclusion, while a written constitution can provide a foundation for civil and political rights, its effectiveness depends on a multitude of factors, including its design, implementation, and the presence of supporting institutions and mechanisms. The dynamic nature of societies and the challenges posed by changing circumstances further emphasize the need for active citizenship and ongoing efforts to defend and renew these rights.

Written constitutions are a mixture of written documents, conventions, and common law

The existence of a constitution is a key indicator of a state's sovereignty. Constitutions can be written or unwritten, codified or uncodified. Written constitutions are typically the product of a dramatic political change, such as a revolution, and are often adopted by new states or states undergoing significant political upheaval.

A written constitution is a formal document that outlines the fundamental principles, rules, and structures of a state's government. It establishes the rights and responsibilities of the government and its citizens, and usually includes provisions for its own amendment. The United States Constitution, for example, is the oldest and shortest written constitution still in force. It has served as a model for many other constitutions worldwide.

Unwritten constitutions, on the other hand, are not contained in a single document but consist of various sources, both written and unwritten. They evolve over time through laws, conventions, and precedents. For instance, the United Kingdom's constitution is unwritten and is derived from sources such as Acts of Parliament, constitutional conventions, and common law.

While written constitutions are typically codified, some may be uncodified, consisting of multiple documents. Similarly, unwritten constitutions can also have written elements, such as constitutional statutes enacted by a parliament. An example is Canada, whose constitution includes written and unwritten elements, with the latter based on common law and convention.

In summary, written constitutions are a mixture of written documents, conventions, and common law. They can be codified or uncodified, and their legitimacy and longevity are often tied to the process by which they are adopted and the consistency of their application.

Frequently asked questions