Federalists And Anti-Federalists: Constitution Compromise

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views on the ratification of the US Constitution. The Federalists, who supported the document, included big property owners, conservative small farmers, businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They wanted a strong central government, weaker state governments, and the indirect election of government officials. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification, included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and took away power from the states, and they wanted stronger state governments and a weak central government. Despite their differences, the two groups reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

The Essential Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers (Hackett Classics)

$10.59 $29.95

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

The Great Compromise which Created the Government of the United States of America: The Federalist - Anti-Populist Papers

$24.37

The Great Compromise which Created the Government of the United States of America: Volume Two: The Populist - Anti-Federalist Papers

$32.12

The Federalist Papers (Signet Classics)

$7.23 $8.95

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection

$1.99

Federalists supported a strong national government, while Anti-Federalists wanted to protect states' rights

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had differing views on the role of the national government and the protection of states' rights. The Federalists supported a strong national government, believing that it was necessary for the United States to function effectively as an independent nation. They wanted a centralized government with the power to pass laws, regulate commerce, print and coin money, and engage in international trade. The Federalists included big property owners, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists wanted to protect states' rights and feared that a strong national government would infringe upon them. They believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments rather than a federal one. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They favored strong state governments, weak central government, direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and accountability to popular majorities.

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution, arguing that it gave too much power to the federal government and took away power from the states. They were concerned that the new "president" role, as the leader of the executive branch, could consolidate too much power and resemble a monarch. They wanted a means to codify individual rights and ensure that the federal government did not become tyrannous.

To address these concerns, the Federalists compromised by adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution, which included the First Amendment. This compromise led to the adoption of the Constitution, although political divisions between Federalists and Anti-Federalists persisted during the presidency of George Washington, particularly over fiscal policy.

Federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation, Anti-Federalists sought less drastic changes

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had differing views on the Articles of Confederation and the degree of change needed to address its shortcomings. The Federalists wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation, while the Anti-Federalists sought less drastic changes and wanted to preserve elements of the existing system.

The Federalists, who included big property owners, conservative small farmers, businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, advocated for a stronger central government and the adoption of a new Constitution. They believed that a strong national government was necessary for the United States to function effectively as an independent nation. They favored weaker state governments, the indirect election of government officials, and representative democracy. They published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers, known as the Federalist Papers, to advocate for their position and propose an alternative to the Articles of Confederation.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, which included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers, opposed the creation of a stronger national government. They sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation and wanted to preserve more power at the state level. The Anti-Federalists believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress and the unitary executive, at the expense of the states. They feared that the unitary executive, or the "president" role, resembled a monarch and could lead to a pseudo-monarchy. They also believed that individual liberties were best protected when power resided in state governments rather than a federal one.

The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the ratification of the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. They argued that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights, which they believed was necessary to protect individual liberties and prevent federal overreach. They published a series of essays, known as the Anti-Federalist Papers, to express their concerns about a strong central government and the absence of a Bill of Rights.

Despite their differences, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists reached a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution. The Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights, which included the First Amendment, to address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists. This compromise ensured that the Constitution survived the ideological differences between the two parties and resulted in the adoption of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

Federalists wanted a strong union, Anti-Federalists opposed a powerful central government

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views on the role of the federal government in the United States. The Federalists, who supported the ratification of the Constitution, believed in a strong central government. They argued that a robust national government was necessary for the US to function as an independent nation. The Federalists included big property owners, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They favored weaker state governments, the indirect election of government officials, and representative democracy.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution, arguing that it gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the states. They believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments rather than a federal one. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, and short term limits for officeholders.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the Constitution led to the creation of the Bill of Rights, which was a compromise between the two groups. The Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment, to address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists. James Madison, a strong supporter of the Constitution, played a key role in drafting these amendments. However, Madison's hope for an amendment in the Bill of Rights that would limit the states was not adopted due to opposition from the Anti-Federalists.

Despite the compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution, political divisions persisted during the presidency of George Washington. Those who supported Alexander Hamilton's aggressive fiscal policies and an expansive interpretation of the Constitution formed the Federalist Party, while their opponents, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, emphasized states' rights and agrarianism.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$6.92 $8.95

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$35.35 $42.5

Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 by James Madison, a Member

$0.99 $99

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$79.05 $85

Federalists supported indirect elections, Anti-Federalists wanted direct election of officials

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had differing views on how the president should be elected. The Federalists, who supported the ratification of the Constitution, favoured indirect elections, while the Anti-Federalists, who opposed ratification, wanted direct elections.

The Federalists, who included big property owners, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, advocated for a strong centralised government and a weak state government. They believed that the president should be elected indirectly, through a process outlined in Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, which is known as the Electoral College. Alexander Hamilton, one of the designers of the Electoral College, defended the indirect electoral process in Federalist No. 68, arguing that it was a better way to select the president than a popular vote. He also believed that the Electoral College prevented the emergence of organised political parties, which he did not expect.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were made up of small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers. They favoured strong state governments, a weak central government, and the direct election of government officials. They believed that power should reside in the states, rather than a federal government, to best protect the liberties of the people. They also wanted short term limits for officeholders, accountability by officeholders to popular majorities, and the strengthening of individual liberties.

Despite their differences, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were able to reach a compromise that led to the adoption of the Constitution. The Federalists agreed to add a Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment, to address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists about the potential for the federal government to become too powerful and tyrannous. This compromise, however, did not extend into the presidency of George Washington, where political divisions emerged over fiscal policy, with some Federalists allying with former Anti-Federalists.

Federalists and Anti-Federalists compromised on the Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had differing views on the role of the federal government in the newly formed United States. The Federalists, who included big property owners, conservative small farmers, businessmen, wealthy merchants, and professionals, supported the ratification of the Constitution. They believed in a strong central government, weaker state governments, and the indirect election of government officials. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, which included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers, opposed the ratification, arguing that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the states. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, and the direct election of government officials.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the ratification of the Constitution led to the creation of the Bill of Rights. They believed that a Bill of Rights was necessary to protect individual liberties and prevent the federal government from becoming tyrannous. In state legislatures across the country, opponents of the Constitution, including Patrick Henry, railed against the extensive powers it granted the federal government. Sensing that Anti-Federalist sentiment would sink ratification efforts, James Madison, a strong supporter of the Constitution, reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach upon.

Madison, along with John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, had previously collaborated to write a series of essays defending the Constitution, known as the Federalist Papers. However, in response to the growing Anti-Federalist sentiment, Madison proposed nine changes to the Constitution and introductory remarks to reiterate the Constitution's mission to protect and uphold individual rights. These additions were interspersed into the body of the Constitution rather than being affixed at the end.

The compromise between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists resulted in the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. These amendments gave American citizens codified individual freedoms, such as freedom of speech and the press. The Bill of Rights thus protected individual liberties and ensured that the federal government's powers were limited, addressing the concerns of both sides.

Frequently asked questions