Federalists' View On The New Constitution: A Positive Outlook

The Federalists, supporters of the proposed Constitution, believed that a stronger national government was required to unite the individual states and create a stronger country. They saw the new Constitution as a way to safeguard the liberty and independence that the American Revolution had created. Federalists included big property owners, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They were well-organised, well-funded, and made careful use of the printed word, with most newspapers supporting their political plan. They believed that the greatest threat to the future of the United States was not in the abuse of central power but in the excesses of democracy. The Federalists argued that the Constitution already contained protections for individual liberties and that the entire Constitution, with its institutional restraints and checks and balances, was, in effect, a Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

The U.S. Constitution and Other Writings (Leather-bound Classics)

$13.21 $24.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$6.92 $8.95

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

The U.S. Constitution: Explained--Clause by Clause--for Every American Today

$9.97 $12

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788 ( Complete )

$15

Federalists believed the new Constitution was required to safeguard liberty and independence created by the American Revolution

Federalists believed that the new Constitution was required to safeguard the liberty and independence created by the American Revolution. They saw their most important role as defending the social gains of the Revolution. The Federalists were well-organised, well-funded, and made careful use of the printed word. Most newspapers supported the Federalists' political plan and published articles and pamphlets explaining why people should approve the Constitution.

The Federalists believed that the greatest threat to the future of the United States was not the abuse of central power but the excesses of democracy, as evidenced by popular disturbances like Shays' Rebellion and the pro-debtor policies of many states. They supported a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution, and a more mercantile economy. They believed that a stronger national government was necessary after the failed Articles of Confederation.

The Federalists argued that the new federal courts were necessary to provide checks and balances on the power of the other two branches of government. They believed that the federal courts would protect citizens from government abuse and guarantee their liberty. They also argued that the Constitution already contained protections for individual liberties in Article I, Sections 9 and 10, which limited Congress and the states, and that the entire Constitution, with its institutional restraints and checks and balances, was, in effect, a Bill of Rights.

The Federalists included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They favoured weaker state governments, a strong centralised government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy. They supported the ratification of the new Constitution and believed that a more robust national government with greater powers was necessary to unite the individual states and create a stronger country.

They supported a strong national government and a mercantile economy

The Federalists, supporters of the proposed Constitution, were in favour of a strong national government and a mercantile economy. They believed that a stronger national government was necessary to unite the individual states and create a stronger country, especially after the failed Articles of Confederation. They saw their most important role as defending the social gains of the Revolution and safeguarding the liberty and independence it had created.

Federalists were well-organised, well-funded, and made careful use of the printed word to spread their ideas. They included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They believed that the greatest threat to the future of the United States was not in the abuse of central power but in the excesses of democracy, as evidenced by popular disturbances like Shays' Rebellion and pro-debtor policies of many states.

Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, three notable Federalists, wrote the Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays supporting the ratification of the Constitution. They argued that the national government only had the powers specifically granted to it and that the federal courts had limited jurisdiction, leaving many areas of the law to the state and local courts. They also argued that the entire Constitution, with its institutional restraints and checks and balances, was, in effect, a Bill of Rights.

The Federalists supported Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton's aggressive fiscal policies, which included an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause. They believed in a strong central government and a loose, decentralised system of government, with weaker state governments, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy. They also supported the incorporation of a national bank and believed in the power of the state to regulate relations with foreign nations, Indian tribes, and among the states.

Federalists argued that the new federal courts were necessary to provide checks and balances on the other branches of government

The Federalists believed that the new federal courts were necessary to provide checks and balances on the other branches of government. They argued that the federal courts had limited jurisdiction, leaving many areas of the law to the state and local courts. Federalists believed that the new federal court system would protect citizens from government abuse and guarantee their liberty. They saw their most important role as defending the social gains of the Revolution.

Federalists supported the ratification of the new Constitution and believed a more robust national government with greater powers was necessary to unite the individual states and create a stronger country. They included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They favored weaker state governments, a strong centralized government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative, rather than direct, democracy.

The Federalists were well-organised, well-funded, and made careful use of the printed word. Most newspapers supported the Federalists' political plan and published articles and pamphlets to explain why the people should approve the Constitution. They believed that the nation might not survive without the passage of the Constitution, and that a stronger national government was necessary after the failed Articles of Confederation.

The Federalists also argued that the entire Constitution, with its institutional restraints and checks and balances, was, in effect, a Bill of Rights. They believed that because it would be impossible to list all the rights afforded to Americans, it would be best to list none. They pointed out that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights because it did not vest the new government with the authority to suppress individual liberties.

Explore related products

The Federalist Papers (Penguin Civic Classics)

$11.01 $15

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Federalist Papers (Signet Classics)

$7.23 $8.95

Documents of Revolution: Common Sense, The Complete Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation, The Articles of Confederation, The U. S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights

$26.99 $26.99

The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays Written in Favour of the New Constitution

$17.99 $17.99

The Original Argument: The Federalists' Case for the Constitution, Adapted for the 21st Century

$3.57 $16

They believed the new Constitution didn't include the authority to suppress individual liberties

The Federalists, supporters of the proposed Constitution, believed that the new Constitution was required to safeguard the liberty and independence that the American Revolution had brought about. They saw their most important role as defending the social gains of the Revolution.

The Federalists believed that the greatest threat to the future of the United States was not the abuse of central power, but the excesses of democracy, as evidenced by popular disturbances like Shays' Rebellion and the pro-debtor policies of many states. They wanted a stronger national government with greater powers to unite the individual states and create a stronger country. They believed that the new federal courts were necessary to provide checks and balances on the power of the other two branches of government, and that these courts would protect citizens from government abuse and guarantee their liberty.

The Federalists argued that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights because the new Constitution did not vest the new government with the authority to suppress individual liberties. They further argued that because it would be impossible to list all the rights afforded to Americans, it would be best to list none. They pointed out that the entire Constitution, with its institutional restraints and checks and balances, was, in effect, a Bill of Rights. They also argued that the Constitution already contained protections for individual liberties in Article I, Sections 9 and 10, which limited Congress and the states.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were worried that the original text of the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights, and wanted guaranteed protection for certain basic liberties, such as freedom of speech and trial by jury. They believed that the new government created by the Constitution was too powerful, and that a stronger federal government would be prone to tyranny and would not adequately protect the rights of individuals and states. The Federalists countered these arguments by explaining that the document had many built-in safeguards, such as limited government, and that the national government only had the powers specifically granted to it.

Federalists were well-organised, well-funded, and made effective use of the printed word

The Federalists, supporters of the proposed Constitution, were a well-organised and well-funded group. They were made up of big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They were led by some of the most talented leaders of the era, including Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington.

The Federalists' wealth and organisation allowed them to make effective use of the printed word. They published articles and pamphlets to explain their political plan and why the people should approve the Constitution. Most newspapers supported the Federalists, and they published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers advocating for the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalists also joined forces to write the Federalist Papers, a collection of 85 essays supporting the ratification of the Constitution.

The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison during 1787-88. These papers laid out the ideology of the Federalists during the creation of the U.S. Constitution. All of the papers were signed "Publius," but each man had a hand in their creation. The Federalist Papers were a powerful tool for the Federalists, allowing them to disseminate their views to a wide audience and make their case for the Constitution.

The Federalists' effective use of the printed word was an important part of their strategy to gain support for the Constitution. They faced strong opposition from the Anti-Federalists, who fought against the creation of a stronger national government and sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists believed that a stronger national government was necessary to unite the individual states and create a stronger country, and they used the printed word to convince the undecided portion of the American people that their plan was in the nation's best interest.

Frequently asked questions