The Supremacy Clause: How It Works

The Supremacy Clause is a founding principle in US constitutional law, designating the Constitution as the supreme law of the land. Essentially, this means that federal law takes precedence over state law. The Supremacy Clause is considered a cornerstone of the US federal political structure, establishing a strong federal government and preventing political chaos. It is a reaction to the lack of a similar clause in the Articles of Confederation, which were the first Constitution of the United States, providing the framework of the US government from 1781 to 1789. The Supremacy Clause was introduced as part of the New Jersey Plan in 1787, during the Constitutional Convention, which assembled to revise the Articles of Confederation.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$236.94 $359

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.32 $126.95

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$305

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$100 $345

The Supremacy Clause and the Supreme Court

The Supremacy Clause is a cornerstone of the United States' federal political structure. It establishes federal law as the law of the land, with the Constitution and the laws of the United States as the supreme law that state judges must abide by. This means that federal statutes take priority over state acts, and state laws that conflict with federal laws are void. The Supremacy Clause also applies to treaties, which are considered as binding as domestic federal law and can supersede state law.

The Supremacy Clause is a response to the problem of state laws conflicting with the Constitution and treaties, such as in the case of Article IV of the Treaty of Peace between the United States and Great Britain at the end of the Revolutionary War. The Clause ensures that federal law is supreme and that Congress can establish rules that American courts must apply, even if state law provides contrary rules. This was affirmed in the 1859 case of Ableman v. Booth, where the Supreme Court held that state courts could not issue rulings that contradicted federal courts, citing the Supremacy Clause.

The Supreme Court has also recognised various ways in which federal statutes can displace or "preempt" state law. For example, in Hines v. Davidowitz (1941), the Court suggested that state law is preempted when its application obstructs the purposes and objectives of a valid federal statute. In Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, the Court ruled that an ordinance requiring individuals to obtain a license to reside in a rented apartment conflicted with pre-existing federal law and was therefore void under the Supremacy Clause.

However, the Supremacy Clause does not grant any federal rights or create a cause of action. Individual litigants cannot sue to enforce federal law through the Clause, as this would prevent Congress from limiting enforcement of federal laws to federal actors. Instead, those seeking injunctive relief against a state actor that refuses to comply with federal law must rely on the inherent equitable power of courts, which can be overridden by Congress.

The Supremacy Clause also does not mean that each state must base its laws on the same policy judgments reflected in federal statutes. While federal statutes take priority, they do not always displace state laws, and there is room for debate about what constitutes a conflict between federal and state laws.

Federal statutes and treaties

The Supremacy Clause, which is part of the US Constitution, establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land". This means that federal statutes and treaties take precedence over any conflicting state laws. This is based on the underlying priority of federal authority, as long as it is expressed in the Constitution.

The Supremacy Clause is not a source of federal rights, and individual litigants cannot sue to enforce federal law through it. Instead, it is a conflict-of-laws rule, specifying that certain federal acts take priority over any state acts that conflict with federal law. This is known as the doctrine of preemption, where the law of a higher authority can supersede the law of a lower authority.

The Supremacy Clause also applies to treaties, which are regarded as equally binding as federal statutes and are part of the "supreme Law of the Land". Treaties can be used to legislate in areas that are within the exclusive authority of the states, and courts have consistently recognized them as legally binding under the Constitution. However, treaties and the laws made pursuant to them must comply with the Constitution, and the Supreme Court has held that Congress can abrogate a treaty by legislative action, even if this violates the treaty under international law.

The Supremacy Clause and state law

The Supremacy Clause is a cornerstone of the United States' federal political structure. It establishes the supremacy of federal law and the priority of federal authority, as long as it is expressed within the boundaries of the Constitution. This means that federal statutes and treaties must be within the federal government's enumerated powers and not violate constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights.

The Supremacy Clause is a conflict-of-laws rule, specifying that certain federal acts take priority over conflicting state acts. This is known as federal preemption, and it applies regardless of whether the conflicting laws come from state legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions. For example, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, a federal statute, preempts state constitutions.

The Supremacy Clause also establishes the priority of federal law in the context of treaties. Under the Supremacy Clause, treaties are considered "supreme law of the land", equal to federal statutes, and can establish rules of decision for American courts, even if state law supplies contrary rules. This aspect of the Supremacy Clause addressed concerns that individual states were jeopardizing the nation's security by violating its treaty obligations.

The Supremacy Clause does not, however, create a cause of action for individual litigants to enforce federal law. Instead, those seeking to enforce federal law against a state actor that refuses to comply must rely on the inherent equitable power of courts, which can be overridden by Congress.

The Supremacy Clause, therefore, ensures that federal law, as long as it is within the scope of the Constitution, takes precedence over state law, shaping the relationship between the states and the federal government in the United States' federal system.

Explore related products

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights

$76.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$245.32 $359

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$305.99

The Supremacy Clause in the Articles of Confederation

The Supremacy Clause, a part of the US Constitution, establishes the supremacy of federal laws, regulations, and treaties over state laws. It is a conflict-of-laws rule, specifying that federal acts take precedence over any conflicting state acts. The Supremacy Clause is considered a cornerstone of the US federal political structure, providing finality in governmental decision-making.

The Articles of Confederation, approved by the Continental Congress in 1777, served as the first Constitution of the United States from 1781 to 1789. It provided the framework for the US government but lacked a clause establishing federal supremacy. Under the Articles of Confederation, federal laws could not supersede federal statutes and regulations. This created issues, such as states jeopardizing the nation's security by violating treaty obligations.

Recognizing the need to address these concerns, James Madison, in the Federalist Papers, advocated for the inclusion of a supremacy clause in the new Constitution. He argued that the supremacy clause was necessary to balance the scales of government between state legislatures and the federal government. As a result, the Supremacy Clause was introduced as part of the New Jersey Plan during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, and it passed unanimously.

The Supremacy Clause, as a reaction to the limitations of the Articles of Confederation, ensures that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority are the supreme Law of the Land. It establishes the priority of federal authority within the boundaries of the Constitution. This means that federal statutes and treaties must be within the federal government's enumerated powers and not violate constitutional limits, such as the Bill of Rights.

In conclusion, the Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution addresses the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation by establishing the supremacy of federal law and providing a framework for resolving conflicts between federal and state legislation. It plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of power between the states and the federal government, ensuring the effective functioning of the nation.

The Supremacy Clause and the Founding Fathers

The Supremacy Clause is a cornerstone of American federalism, serving as a vital mechanism for maintaining the integrity of the Constitution and the rule of law. It ensures that the principles and values upon which the United States was founded remain consistent across all states and that the federal government has the authority to enforce its laws uniformly. This clause, found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution, establishes the supremacy of federal law over state law, asserting that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties made under the authority of the United States are the "supreme Law of the Land."

The Founding Fathers, the framers of the Constitution, understood the importance of establishing a strong federal government with the power to enforce its laws and maintain national unity. During the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Founding Fathers debated the role of the federal government and the states, ultimately adopting the Supremacy Clause as part of the New Jersey Plan. James Wilson, a delegate from Pennsylvania, emphasized the predominance of the Constitution over any actions by Congress, stating that anything enacted contrary to it would not have the force of law. Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist No. 33, also defended the Supremacy Clause, arguing that federal laws must be supreme by definition, or they would amount to nothing.

The Supremacy Clause was a response to concerns arising from the Articles of Confederation, which preceded the Constitution. Under the Articles, individual states had significant autonomy, and there was a lack of centralized authority. The Founding Fathers sought to address this by including the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution, ensuring that federal law took precedence over state law and that the nation functioned as a cohesive whole.

The Founding Fathers' intent with the Supremacy Clause was to create a unified nation with consistent laws and values across all states. They recognized that certain issues, such as civil rights, environmental protection, and interstate commerce, required a uniform approach that only the federal government could provide. By giving the Constitution and federal laws supremacy, they laid the foundation for a strong federal system that could effectively govern the nation.

The Supremacy Clause has had a significant impact on the relationship between the federal government and the states. It empowers the federal government to enforce its laws uniformly and ensures that state laws do not undermine the nation's integrity. The Supreme Court has relied on this clause in numerous cases to resolve conflicts between federal and state laws, establishing the final jurisdiction of federal courts in matters involving the Constitution and federal statutes.

Frequently asked questions