Amending The Constitution: A Reflection Of Democracy

The process of amending the United States Constitution is outlined in Article V of the Constitution, which establishes two methods for proposing amendments. The first method involves Congress proposing an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The second method, which has never been used, involves a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Once an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states to become part of the Constitution. The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately difficult, reflecting the intention for the document to endure for ages to come. Since its drafting in 1787, the Constitution has been amended only 27 times, including the first 10 amendments adopted in 1791 as the Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Constitutional Law Series)

$3.99

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.21

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$105.51 $150

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

The role of Congress

The process of constitutional amendment in the United States reflects a careful balance of powers between Congress and the individual states. Amending the Constitution is intentionally difficult, as the framers wanted to ensure that any changes would have widespread support and reflect a national consensus.

Congress plays a crucial role in initiating the amendment process. According to Article V of the Constitution, Congress can propose amendments whenever two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate deem it necessary. This is done through a joint resolution, which is then forwarded directly to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for processing and publication. Congress has proposed thirty-three amendments using this method, but only twenty-seven of these have been ratified by the states.

The process of constitutional amendment, therefore, reflects the framers' belief in checks and balances and their desire to protect the rights of minorities. By requiring the support of both Congress and a supermajority of states, the amendment process ensures that any changes to the nation's fundamental law have the backing of a wide range of Americans.

Ratification by state legislatures

The process of amending the US Constitution is outlined in Article V of the Constitution. It is a difficult and time-consuming process. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787.

Amendments may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, so the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval.

Once an amendment is approved by Congress, it is sent to the states for ratification. It becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-quarters of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states). The vote of each state carries equal weight, regardless of its population or length of time in the Union.

The process of ratification is administered by the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist officially notifies the states that an amendment has been proposed by sending a registered letter to each state's governor. The governor then formally submits the amendment to their state's legislature for ratification.

The state legislatures can choose to ratify or reject the proposed amendment. In a few instances, states have sent official documents to NARA to record the rejection of an amendment or the rescission of a prior ratification.

When the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and serves as official notice that the amendment process has been completed.

In recent years, the signing of the certification has become a ceremonial function attended by various dignitaries, including the President.

The President's involvement

The President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process. The joint resolution proposing an amendment does not go to the White House for signature or approval. Instead, the original document is forwarded directly to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication.

However, there have been instances of presidents playing an informal, ministerial role in the amendment process. For example, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery, even though his signature was not necessary for its proposal or ratification. Similarly, President James Buchanan took the unprecedented step of signing the Corwin Amendment in 1861, a last-ditch effort to prevent the American Civil War. President Clinton has also endorsed the idea of a crime victims' rights amendment.

In recent history, the signing of the certification of a new amendment has become a ceremonial function attended by various dignitaries, which may include the President. For example, President Johnson signed the certifications for the 24th and 25th Amendments as a witness, and President Nixon witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment.

Despite these examples, the Supreme Court has articulated the Judicial Branch's understanding that the President has no formal constitutional role in the amendment process. In the 1798 case of Hollingsworth v. Virginia, the Court held that the Eleventh Amendment had been constitutionally adopted without the President's involvement. Justice Samuel Chase stated during oral argument that the President has nothing to do with the proposition or adoption of amendments to the Constitution. Later, in the 1920 Hawke v. Smith case, the Supreme Court affirmed its decision in Hollingsworth, stating that the submission of a constitutional amendment did not require the action of the President.

Explore related products

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

The United States Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments: Large Print Edition (Annotated)

$9.99

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$143.59 $180

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$15.99 $26.99

Article V's two methods

Article V of the United States Constitution outlines two methods for proposing amendments to the Constitution. The first method involves Congress proposing an amendment, which requires a two-thirds majority vote in both Houses. Once an amendment is proposed by Congress, it is forwarded to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for processing and publication. The second method, which has never been used, involves the states calling for a convention to propose amendments. This would require support from two-thirds of the state legislatures, or 34 out of 50 states.

The process of constitutional amendment reflects the wise foresight of the Founding Fathers in creating a mechanism for peaceful change. It offers a systematic and deliberate approach to making necessary changes to the law, encouraging civic engagement and ensuring that amendments reflect a broad consensus. The rigorous ratification process prevents hasty amendments and reinforces the Constitution's role as a living and enduring document.

The first method of amendment, through Congress, has been used thirty-three times to propose constitutional amendments, with twenty-seven of these being ratified by the states. The second method, involving a convention, has never been used despite being a powerful check against federal overreach. This method allows states to act independently of Congress and propose amendments when Congress may be unwilling or unable to address issues of great concern to the states and the people.

The ratification process for both methods requires approval by three-fourths of the state legislatures or state conventions. This ensures that any changes to the Constitution have widespread support and reflect the will of the people in the states. The Supreme Court acts as an additional check on this process, ensuring that the state ratification process is constitutional.

In conclusion, the process of constitutional amendment reflects the careful design of the Founding Fathers, who established a systematic and collaborative approach to amending the nation's fundamental laws. The two methods outlined in Article V provide flexibility and balance, allowing for necessary changes to be made while ensuring broad consensus and stability.

Difficulty of amending

Amending the US Constitution is a difficult and permanent way of changing laws in the United States. The Constitution is the founding document of the United States and is considered the "'supreme law of the land", meaning that the government must follow it. The Constitution can only be changed through the amendment process.

The framers of the Constitution, the men who wrote it, wanted the amendment process to be difficult. They believed that a long and complicated amendment process would help create stability in the United States. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the early 1800s that the Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come". To ensure its longevity, the framers made amending the document a challenging task.

The amendment process is indeed very difficult and time-consuming. A proposed amendment must be passed by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate (two-thirds of both houses of Congress). Alternatively, it can be passed with a two-thirds vote at a national convention of state legislatures, although this has never happened. After passing in Congress or at a convention, the amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of all states (38 out of 50 states), either in their state legislatures or at a special convention. This process is rarely used, and in over 230 years, there have only been 27 amendments to the Constitution.

The difficulty of amending the Constitution is further illustrated by the fact that many proposed amendments never reach ratification. For example, the ERA Amendment did not pass the necessary majority of state legislatures in the 1980s, and supporters of congressional term limits and a balanced budget amendment were also unsuccessful in getting their desired amendments. The process is designed to be challenging, and not just any idea deserves an amendment. The amendment must have a significant impact on all Americans or secure the rights of citizens.

Frequently asked questions