Social Media's Political Campaigning: Impact On Elections

Social media has transformed the nature of political elections and campaigns, offering a place for news, discourse, and election information. It has become a powerful tool for candidates to connect with voters and influence elections. With the ability to engage with a diverse audience in real-time, social media platforms facilitate the rapid spread of information, foster a sense of belonging, and encourage active participation. This engagement is a significant factor in the increasing importance of social media in elections. Candidates can use social media to communicate their policy views and humanize themselves, helping voters feel more connected to them. Additionally, social media platforms provide a space for voters to interact with elections, discuss their positions, and share their support. Political campaigns recognize the influence of social media and allocate significant resources to their online presence, including advertising and targeted political ads. While social media can enhance political participation, it also raises concerns about misinformation and biased reporting, which can influence voters' perceptions and shape election outcomes.

Explore related products

Trolling Ourselves to Death: Democracy in the Age of Social Media (Oxford Studies in Digital Politics)

$20.68 $25.99

Likewar: The Weaponization of Social Media

$14.7 $19.99

The Politics of Platform Regulation: How Governments Shape Online Content Moderation (Oxford Studies in Digital Politics)

$21.99 $27.95

Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media (Oxford Studies in Digital Politics)

$13.43 $22.39

Mass Media and American Politics

$69.16 $91

Social Media and Politics in Southeast Asia (Elements in Politics and Society in Southeast Asia)

$23 $23

Social media campaigning can be used to humanise candidates and help voters feel more connected to them

Social media has transformed the nature of political campaigning, offering a place for news, discourse, and election information. It has become a powerful tool for candidates to connect with voters and humanise themselves.

Candidates can use social media to showcase their personalities and interests outside of politics. For instance, they might share their favourite sports team or a story about their pet. This helps voters to see the candidate as a relatable person, rather than just a politician. It allows candidates to appear more approachable and accessible, fostering a sense of connection with voters.

For example, former Democratic presidential contender Pete Buttigieg introduced his shelter dogs to his 2 million Twitter followers. This simple act may have helped voters feel more connected to him on a personal level. Similarly, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren used Instagram Live to chat with supporters who had donated small amounts to her campaign. These donors may have felt more invested in Warren's campaign after interacting with her directly.

Social media also provides a space for voters to discuss their positions and share their support for candidates. This can create a sense of community and encourage participation. For instance, an "I Voted" button or image can serve as a reminder for others to vote and create peer pressure to encourage voting. Social media platforms allow candidates to speak directly to constituents and build relationships, which can be especially beneficial for newcomers seeking to gain momentum.

However, it is important to note that social media platforms have been criticised for their weak guardrails against misinformation. The spread of false or misleading information can influence voters' perceptions of candidates and the issues. Additionally, the strategic considerations underlying election campaigns on social media can differ from traditional media, as topics discussed by candidates may not always align with the priorities of the mass audience.

Social media platforms can be used to disseminate misinformation and influence voters

Social media platforms have become an integral part of political campaigning, with candidates investing significant resources into their online presence. While social media can facilitate engagement and connection with voters, it also presents opportunities for the dissemination of misinformation and the influence of voters through targeted advertising.

One of the challenges posed by social media platforms is their potential to spread misinformation. These platforms often have weak guardrails for deterring misinformation, with inconsistent rules and difficulties in effectively implementing content moderation and fact-checking. While research suggests that visits to misinformation websites are a small fraction of overall media consumption, the spread of false or misleading information can still impact voters' perceptions and influence election outcomes.

Targeted political advertising is another way social media can influence voters. Political campaigns pay social media platforms to push ads to specific demographic groups, leveraging user data to create tailored messages. While this practice can increase knowledge about candidates and encourage participation, it also raises ethical concerns. The British firm Cambridge Analytica, for example, collected and sold social media user information during the 2016 US presidential election, influencing voters with targeted ads.

The interactive nature of social media also plays a role in influencing voters. Voters often use these platforms to discuss their positions and share their support, creating peer pressure that can encourage or discourage voting. Additionally, the content shared by candidates on social media can differ significantly from the priorities of the mass audience, potentially shaping public discourse and influencing voters' perceptions.

Furthermore, social media platforms can amplify biased reporting and "horse race" coverage, which focuses on who is ahead or behind in the election race. This type of coverage can foster public cynicism and mistrust of candidates, portraying candidates as self-interested. It can also reduce voter turnout if people feel their vote doesn't matter. Thus, social media platforms can inadvertently contribute to the dissemination of biased or misleading information, influencing voters' decisions and perceptions.

Social media has become a place for news, discourse and election information

Social media has become an integral part of our daily lives, and its influence on elections and political campaigns cannot be understated. It has transformed the nature of elections, offering a space for news, discourse, and election information. With about 82% of adults in the United States getting news from digital devices, social media platforms have become a go-to source for election-related updates and discussions.

These platforms provide a unique opportunity for politicians to connect with voters and vice versa. Candidates can use social media to communicate their policy views, share personal stories, and humanize themselves, fostering a deeper connection with their audience. This was evident in Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign, where he harnessed social media to rally a majority of voters and win the election. Social media also allows politicians to engage with a diverse audience in real time, rapidly disseminating information and encouraging active participation.

Voters, on the other hand, use social media to discuss their positions, share their support, and even pressure others to vote. For instance, Facebook's "I Voted" button, along with seeing their friends who have voted, encourages people to vote themselves. This interactive and communal nature of social media creates a sense of belonging and empowers voters to make more informed decisions.

Additionally, social media platforms enable political campaigns to target specific demographic groups with advertisements. While this can be beneficial for reaching potential voters, it also raises concerns about the spread of misinformation and the creation of echo chambers. The weak guardrails against misinformation and the inconsistent application of platform rules can negatively impact civil discourse and voters' perceptions.

Furthermore, the topics discussed by candidates on social media may not always align with the priorities of the mass audience, and different platforms may cater to distinct purposes. For example, during the 2013 German federal election campaign, candidates used Facebook and Twitter for different purposes, with their communication shaped by the characteristics of each platform.

Explore related products

Social Media and Democracy (SSRC Anxieties of Democracy)

$39.36 $45

Media Politics: A Citizen's Guide

$27 $78.13

Winning the Social Media War: How Conservatives Can Fight Back, Reclaim the Narrative, and Turn the Tides Against the Left

$17.3 $18

The Guide To Going Viral: The Art and Science of Succeeding on Social Media

$1.99 $9.99

Wrong: How Media, Politics, and Identity Drive Our Appetite for Misinformation

$27.85 $29.95

Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy (Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion)

$17.84 $30

Social media campaigning can be used to encourage active participation and improve voter turnout

Social media campaigning has had a profound impact on elections, with politicians increasingly leveraging these platforms to influence voters and shape political agendas. This influence can be harnessed to encourage active participation and improve voter turnout in several ways.

Firstly, social media provides a unique opportunity for politicians to connect with voters on a personal level. By sharing relatable content, such as their favourite sports team or their pets, candidates can appear more approachable and human, fostering a sense of connection with voters. This strategy was effectively employed by former Democratic presidential contender Pete Buttigieg, who introduced his shelter dogs to his 2 million Twitter followers.

Secondly, social media platforms facilitate real-time engagement and interaction between politicians and voters. This allows candidates to directly address their constituents, answer questions, and respond to concerns. By creating a space for two-way communication, social media can foster a sense of participation and involvement among voters, encouraging them to take an active interest in the election process.

Additionally, social media platforms can amplify the reach of political campaigns, helping them to access a wider and more diverse audience. This is especially beneficial for newcomers, who may not have the same financial resources or connections as incumbent candidates. By utilising social media, newcomers can gain visibility, share their policy views, and build a supportive base of followers, levelling the playing field to some extent.

Furthermore, social media platforms offer a convenient and accessible way to disseminate election-related information. Organisations holding elections can use these platforms to keep members informed about the event, share news, and even provide direct links to online voting tools. This can be particularly effective in encouraging participation among those who may not typically engage in traditional voting processes.

Finally, social media can leverage peer pressure to encourage voting. For example, Facebook's "I Voted" button, which highlights to a user's friends that they have voted, has been shown to increase voter turnout. This phenomenon was also observed in a 2012 study, where creating a social norm around civic duty encouraged greater civic participation.

In conclusion, while social media campaigning has been criticised for spreading misinformation and creating echo chambers, it can also be a powerful tool for encouraging active participation and improving voter turnout. By utilising the interactive and communal nature of these platforms, politicians and organisations can foster a sense of engagement and belonging, ultimately contributing to a more democratic and representative electoral process.

Social media advertising can be used to target specific demographic groups

Social media has transformed the nature of elections and campaigns, offering a place for news, discourse, and election information. It has become a powerful tool for political campaigns, allowing candidates to connect with a diverse audience in real-time, fostering a sense of belonging and encouraging active participation. This engagement is a crucial reason why social media is essential in elections and campaigns.

Research on political advertising suggests that ads can have various effects on voters. They can increase knowledge about candidates, persuade voters to support a particular candidate, and motivate supporters to vote. Social media advertising can be highly targeted, based on demographic and even psychographic characteristics, making it a complex and challenging area to track.

Social media platforms have weak guardrails for deterring misinformation, with inconsistent rules and challenging implementation of content moderation and fact-checking. While misinformation is a concern, there is evidence that visits to misinformation websites make up a tiny fraction of people's overall media consumption. Social media has also been shown to be a place where voters can discuss their positions and share their support, creating peer pressure to encourage voting.

Social media has changed the political landscape, allowing both incumbents and newcomers to connect directly with constituents. It has provided a platform for newcomers to gain momentum, with candidates raising significant funds through social media engagement. It also offers an opportunity for candidates to humanize themselves, helping voters feel more connected to them.

Frequently asked questions