Amending The Constitution: A Step-By-Step Guide

The process of amending the US Constitution is a difficult task, as the framers intended when it was first drafted in 1787. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since then, with none of the amendments being proposed by constitutional convention. Amendments may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. The Archivist of the United States is responsible for administering the ratification process, which is finalised when three-quarters of the states ratify the proposed amendment.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$103.61 $150

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Amendment XIV: Due Process (Constitutional Amendments)

$30.31

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.18

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.34 $45

Amendments are proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate

The United States Constitution was crafted with the intention of enduring for ages. To ensure its longevity, the framers made the process of amending the document challenging. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since 1787, which includes the first 10 amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, that were adopted four years later.

Amending the Constitution is a complex process, and one of the ways to propose an amendment is through Congress. A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required to propose an amendment. This means that for an amendment to be proposed, it needs the support of at least 290 representatives and 67 senators. This high threshold ensures that any proposed amendment has broad bipartisan support and is not a reflection of transient political sentiments.

The process of proposing an amendment in Congress involves a joint resolution. This joint resolution does not require the signature or approval of the President, as the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process. Instead, the original document is sent directly to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for processing and publication. The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) within NARA plays a crucial role in this stage by adding legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishing it in slip law format.

Once an amendment is proposed by Congress, it is then forwarded to the states for ratification. The process of ratification can occur through one of two methods, as determined by Congress. The first method is for the legislatures of three-quarters of the states (38 out of 50 states) to ratify the amendment. The second method, which has only been used once in American history for the 1933 ratification of the Twenty-First Amendment, involves ratifying conventions conducted in three-quarters of the states.

The process of amending the Constitution through a proposal by Congress with a two-thirds majority in both chambers ensures that any changes to the foundational document of the nation are carefully considered and broadly supported. It reflects the framers' intention to create a durable Constitution that can be amended when necessary, but only through a rigorous and deliberate process.

A constitutional convention can propose amendments if called for by two-thirds of state legislatures

The United States Constitution was designed to be a durable document that would "endure for ages to come". As a result, the process of amending it is challenging. It has only been successfully completed 27 times since it was drafted in 1787.

Amendments to the Constitution may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Alternatively, a constitutional convention can propose amendments if called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. This second route has never been used for any of the 27 amendments to the Constitution.

The process of calling a constitutional convention begins with state legislators, who must approve a convention referendum. Most states require a majority legislative vote, while others demand a supermajority. In almost all states, this referendum must then be approved by a majority of voters. However, a handful of states bypass the legislature and call a convention through the initiative process.

Once a constitutional convention has been called, it can propose amendments. For an amendment to become part of the Constitution, it must be ratified. Congress determines whether ratification is achieved through the legislatures of three-quarters of the states or by ratifying conventions in three-quarters of the states. The latter method has only been used once in American history, for the 1933 ratification of the Twenty-First Amendment.

The process of amending the Constitution is administered by the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist's certification of the facial legal sufficiency of ratification documents is final and conclusive, and the signing of this certification has become a ceremonial function attended by dignitaries.

The Archivist of the US administers the ratification process, following procedures established by the Secretary of State

The process of amending the US Constitution is a complex and challenging task, as the framers intended when they drafted the document in 1787. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since then, indicating the high bar for implementing changes. The Archivist of the United States plays a crucial role in this process by administering the ratification process, following procedures established by the Secretary of State.

The Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for overseeing the ratification process after Congress proposes an amendment. This responsibility is derived from Article V of the Constitution and the provisions of 1 U.S.C. 106b. While the Archivist does not make substantive determinations on the validity of state ratification actions, they play a key role in certifying the facial legal sufficiency of ratification documents, which is final and conclusive.

The process begins with Congress proposing an amendment in the form of a joint resolution, bypassing the President, who does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process. The original document is then sent to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes, publishes the resolution in slip law format, and assembles an information package for the states.

The Archivist, in collaboration with the Director of the Federal Register, then submits the proposed amendment to the states for their consideration. Each governor receives a letter of notification along with the informational material prepared by the OFR. The governors then formally submit the amendment to their state legislatures or call for a convention, as specified by Congress.

Once a state ratifies the proposed amendment, it sends the Archivist an original or certified copy of the state action. The Archivist then conveys this information to the Director of the Federal Register for examination and acknowledgment. The OFR retains these documents until an amendment is adopted or fails, after which they are transferred to the National Archives for preservation. A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution when ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50).

Explore related products

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$8.23 $26.99

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Constitutional Law Series)

$3.99

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

Weak viability: The Iraqi federal state and the constitutional amendment process

$9.99

Amendment XII: Presidential Election Process (Constitutional Amendments)

$43.2

An amendment must be ratified by three-quarters of the states to become part of the Constitution

The United States Constitution was crafted to be a durable document that would stand the test of time. As such, the process of amending it is deliberately difficult and has only been achieved 27 times since it was drafted in 1787. The authority to amend the Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution, which outlines the procedures for altering the document.

Amendments can be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention requested by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Once proposed, an amendment must be ratified to become part of the Constitution. This can be achieved through the legislatures of three-quarters of the states (38 out of 50 states) or by ratifying conventions in three-quarters of the states, as determined by Congress. The latter method has only been used once in history, during the 1933 ratification of the 21st Amendment.

The ratification process is administered by the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist's role is to certify the facial legal sufficiency of ratification documents, which has become a ceremonial function witnessed by dignitaries, including the President on some occasions. The Director of the Federal Register assists the Archivist and examines the ratification documents, ensuring their authenticity and legal sufficiency.

The process of amending the Constitution is a meticulous and challenging endeavour, reflecting the framers' intention to create a durable and enduring document. The high bar for ratification by three-quarters of the states ensures that any amendments reflect a broad consensus across the nation.

State constitutions are amended more frequently than the federal Constitution

The United States Constitution was crafted with the intention of enduring for ages, and the process of amending it is intentionally difficult. Since its inception in 1787, it has been amended only 27 times, with none of these amendments being proposed by constitutional convention. Amending the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. This challenging process ensures that amendments are reserved for significant matters that impact all Americans or protect the rights of citizens.

In contrast, state constitutions are amended far more frequently. For instance, Texas has had 491 amendments to its constitution since 1876. In 2022 alone, state constitutions were collectively amended nearly 70 times. State constitutions are more prone to amendment due to their broader scope, encompassing a wider range of functions, including local government structures, education systems, taxation, and civil rights. They tend to be longer and more detailed, providing greater opportunity for modifications that address specific local needs and evolving societal demands.

The amendment processes for state constitutions are generally less complex and may involve voter initiatives, where citizens can directly propose changes without going through the legislative process. Many states require only a simple majority vote for certain amendments, making it easier to respond to pressing issues and the will of the people. The variability among states in their amendment procedures also contributes to the higher frequency of amendments.

State constitutions often resemble statutes with intricate rules and detailed provisions. For example, the Michigan Constitution has extensive provisions on voter registration and absentee ballots, while the Texas Constitution includes specific banking regulations, including the authorization of ATM machines. These detailed and varied provisions allow states to address their unique circumstances and adapt to change.

The differences in the frequency of amendments between state and federal constitutions reflect the distinct roles they play in shaping government, promoting democracy, and safeguarding rights. While the federal Constitution sets a foundational framework, state constitutions tailor its principles to their specific needs, demonstrating the dynamic nature of constitutional governance in the United States.

Frequently asked questions