Founders' Ratification Rift: Constitution's Contentious Journey

The founders disagreed over the ratification of the Constitution due to differing views on the role of federal government. Supporters of the Constitution, known as Federalists, defended the document's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, opposed the Constitution, arguing that it gave too much power to the federal government and wanted to protect states' rights. The Anti-Federalists played a crucial role in the ratification debate, with their efforts leading to the adoption of the Bill of Rights, which has become the most important part of the Constitution for many Americans. The ratification campaign was a contentious and challenging process, with passionate debates taking place across the country.

Explore related products

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

Raising the Eleventh Pillar: The Ratification Debate of 1788 (Flashpoints)

$25.5 $25.5

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification, Part Two: January to August 1788 (Library of America)

$27.9 $42.5

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$60.52 $85

Federalists vs Anti-Federalists

In 1787, a few years after the Revolutionary War, the United States was facing the threat of collapse. The country's first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, had granted the Confederation Congress the authority to make rules and request funds from the states, but it lacked enforcement powers, the ability to regulate commerce, and the capacity to print money. This resulted in disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, endangering the unity of the young nation.

To address this crisis, Alexander Hamilton encouraged Congress to convene a Grand Convention of state delegates to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention assembled in Philadelphia in May 1787, with General George Washington as its unanimously elected president. The delegates were tasked with revising the existing government but ultimately crafted a new one, creating a powerful central government.

During the year-long debates over ratification, supporters of the new Constitution were known as Federalists, while their opponents were dubbed Anti-Federalists. The Federalists defended the strengthened national government outlined in the Constitution, which included greater congressional powers, a more robust executive, and an independent judiciary. However, the Anti-Federalists expressed concern that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and insisted on the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties and curtail the powers of the central government.

The ratification campaign was intense and contentious, with debates occurring in homes, taverns, and the printed page. The Federalists faced significant opposition in states like Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, where ratification was made contingent on the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. In Massachusetts, the Federalists had to promise amendments protecting the liberties of the people after ratification to secure a narrow victory. The Federalists employed strategies such as adjourning conventions to gain more support, as seen in New Hampshire.

The Anti-Federalists played a crucial role in shaping the Constitution. Their persistence led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights, which has become the most important part of the Constitution for many Americans. The spirit of compromise reflected in the ratification process demonstrated the patriotism and capacity for self-government of the American people.

State legislatures bypassed

The founders of the United States Constitution set the terms for its ratification, bypassing the state legislatures. They reasoned that the members of the state legislatures would be reluctant to give up power to a national government. Instead, they called for special ratifying conventions in each state. The delegates behind the Constitution were wary of centralised power and loyal to their states, so they created a powerful central government.

The Federalists, who supported the Constitution, defended its strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the Constitution, believed it gave too much power to the federal government. They wanted a Bill of Rights to curtail the powers of the central government and guarantee people's individual liberties. The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country. In Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, three crucial states, they made ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights.

The Federalists dominated in the Pennsylvania convention, carrying the vote on 12 December by 46 to 23. The vote for ratification in Pennsylvania did not end the rancor and bitterness. The ratification campaign was a nail-biter. The tide turned in Massachusetts, where the “vote now, amend later” compromise helped secure victory in that state and eventually in the final holdouts.

Ratification debates

The ratification debates following the drafting of the US Constitution in 1787 were passionate and contentious. Supporters of the Constitution called themselves Federalists, while their opponents were known as Anti-Federalists. The Federalists argued for a strengthened national government with greater congressional powers, a more powerful executive, and an independent judiciary. The Anti-Federalists, meanwhile, advocated for states' rights and a more limited role for the federal government. They believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and wanted a Bill of Rights to curtail its powers and guarantee individual liberties.

The debates took place in homes, taverns, and on the printed page, with newspapers across the country publishing the positions of both sides. Pennsylvania, due to its size, wealth, and influence, and as the first state to call a ratifying convention, was a particular focus of national attention. The Federalists in Pennsylvania, led by James Wilson, carried the vote on December 12 by a margin of 46 to 23. However, the rancor and bitterness did not end with the vote, and the Anti-Federalists continued to mobilize against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country.

Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, three crucial states, made their ratification of the Constitution contingent on the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. In Massachusetts, the debate turned physical, with a brawl breaking out between Elbridge Gerry of the Anti-Federalists and Francis Dana of the Federalists. James Madison, who had initially argued against a Bill of Rights, eventually agreed to draft a list of rights to secure the support of these key states.

The "vote now, amend later" compromise in Massachusetts helped secure victory for the Federalists and paved the way for the eventual ratification of the Constitution. Ratification by 9 of the 13 states was required to enact the new government, and this was achieved with the support of Maryland and South Carolina, bringing the total to 9 states. The ratification campaign was a close contest, with the Federalists ultimately succeeding in establishing a powerful central government that bypassed the state legislatures.

Explore related products

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 38: Bill of Rights, No. 2, The Public Debate, September 1787-May 1788 (Volume 38)

$95

All You Want to Know About the United States Constitution: The Constitutional Convention and the Ratification Debates

$15.99 $25

An Anti-Federalist Constitution: The Development of Dissent in the Ratification Debates (American Political Thought)

$27.3 $42.99

The Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Volume 39: Bill of Rights, No. 3, The Public Debate, 4 June-31 December 1788 (Volume 39)

$95

The Fate of the Revolution: Virginians Debate the Constitution (Witness to History)

$2.99 $22

Madison's notes of the Constitutional Convention Debates (1787)

$3.99

Bill of Rights

The founding fathers of the United States of America disagreed over the ratification of the Constitution, with Federalists supporting it and Anti-Federalists opposing it. The Federalists, led by James Wilson, defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, increased congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were concerned that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and wanted a Bill of Rights to curtail the powers of the central government and guarantee individual liberties.

The debate over ratification was heated and often contentious, taking place in homes, taverns, and on the printed page. The Federalists wanted to bypass the state legislatures, knowing that their members would be reluctant to give up power to a national government. Instead, they called for special ratifying conventions in each state, requiring ratification by 9 of the 13 states to enact the new government. The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in these state legislatures across the country, making ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights in crucial states like Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York. The tide turned in Massachusetts, where the "vote now, amend later" compromise helped secure victory and eventually led to the required number of states ratifying the Constitution.

The original draft of the Constitution did not include a Bill of Rights, and James Madison initially argued against having one, fearing that it would limit the people's rights. However, facing opposition from the Anti-Federalists, he reluctantly agreed to draft a list of rights that the new federal government could not encroach. The Bill of Rights, fashioned after the English Bill of Rights and George Mason's Virginia Declaration of Rights, includes 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens, such as the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments.

The adoption of the Bill of Rights reflected the spirit of compromise and patriotism that yielded ratification. It also demonstrated the Americans' capacity for self-government and has become the most important part of the Constitution for most Americans. The Amendments have been frequently debated and cited in Supreme Court cases, protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens and shaping the American republic. The persistence of the Anti-Federalists over two hundred years ago played a significant role in ensuring the inclusion of the Bill of Rights, which remains a fundamental aspect of the U.S. constitutional framework.

State conventions

The founders disagreed over the ratification of the Constitution during state conventions, with Federalists and Anti-Federalists taking opposing stances. Federalists supported the Constitution, while Anti-Federalists opposed it, arguing that it gave too much power to the federal government. The Anti-Federalists mobilized against the Constitution in state legislatures and made ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights. The Federalists, on the other hand, defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary.

The ratification campaign was a closely contested affair, with each side passionately advocating for their position. Pennsylvania, being the first state to call a ratifying convention and due to its size, wealth, and influence, became the focus of national attention. The debates and arguments took place in homes, taverns, and on the printed page, with newspapers across the country reprinting the positions of both sides. The Federalists, led by James Wilson, ultimately carried the vote in Pennsylvania by a margin of 46 to 23.

Massachusetts was another crucial state in the ratification process. The opposition forced the Federalists to promise amendments protecting the liberties of the people after ratification. On February 6, Massachusetts narrowly approved the Constitution by a vote of 187 to 168, becoming the sixth state to do so. The Federalists in New Hampshire adjourned the convention to gain more support, while Maryland and South Carolina overwhelmingly ratified the Constitution, bringing the total to eight states.

The ratification of the Constitution required the support of at least nine of the 13 states. The approval of Virginia and New York was considered essential due to their political and economic influence and geographical location. The Anti-Federalists in these states played a significant role, and their sentiment led James Madison to agree to draft a list of rights, which became the Bill of Rights. The "vote now, amend later" compromise in Massachusetts helped secure victory and influenced the final holdouts, ultimately leading to the ratification of the Constitution.

Frequently asked questions