Madison's Constitution: Democratic Intentions Examined

James Madison (1751–1836) was a prominent figure in the drafting, explaining, and ratification of the US Constitution. He played a crucial role in calling the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, where he actively participated in shaping the Virginia Plan, which formed the basis for the convention's discussions. Madison's plan, which favoured the large states and granted significant power to a new federal government, sparked intense debate. While Madison sought to address the shortcomings of the federal government under the Articles of Confederation, he was also committed to rectifying internal injustices within states, particularly the tendency of state-level majorities to infringe on the rights of individuals and minorities. Despite his efforts, Madison was unsuccessful in his attempt to include a federal veto on state laws within the Constitution. However, he believed that the federal government under the proposed Constitution would better safeguard individual and minority rights. Madison's contributions extended beyond the Constitutional Convention, as he joined Alexander Hamilton and John Jay in writing The Federalist Papers, a series of influential pro-ratification essays. As the chief author of the Bill of Rights, Madison championed religious liberty, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. He also advocated for a system of checks and balances, including institutional separation of powers, bicameralism, and federalism, to prevent tyranny and promote the public good.

Explore related products

The Federalist: A Commentary on the Constitution of the United States (Modern Library Classics)

$13.74 $24

Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787: Which Framed the Constitution of the United States of America

$30.54 $45.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights, Common Sense, and The Federalist Papers (Royal ... (Case Laminate Hardcover with Jacket)

$51.15 $59.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Liberty's Blueprint: How Madison and Hamilton Wrote the Federalist Papers, Defined the Constitution, and Made Democracy S

$10.99 $21.99

The Federalist Papers (Penguin Civic Classics)

$11.01 $15

Madison's Virginia Plan

James Madison, a delegate from Virginia, believed that the solution to America's problems was to be found in a strong central government. He envisioned a strong national government with three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. This was a radical departure from the Articles of Confederation, which had one vote for each state. Madison believed that representation ought to be apportioned by population, with more populous states having more votes.

The Virginia Plan, also known as the Randolph Plan or the Large-State Plan, was introduced to the Constitutional Convention in 1787 by James Madison and Edmund Randolph. It was drafted by Madison in consultation with members of the Virginia and Pennsylvania delegations, including Randolph, who largely shared his vision. The plan was presented as fifteen draft resolutions outlining basic principles of government.

The Virginia Plan called for the creation of a supreme national government with three branches and a bicameral legislature. The legislature would consist of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives, with proportional representation based on population. The members of the first branch of the national Legislature were to be elected by the people of the several states for a term of three years, receive fixed stipends, and be ineligible for any office established by a particular state or under the authority of the United States during their term of service and for one year after its expiration.

The members of the second branch of the national Legislature were to be chosen by the individual Legislatures, be at least thirty years old, and hold their offices for a term of seven years to ensure their independence. The Virginia Plan favored the interests of states with large populations, while the New Jersey Plan was proposed to protect small state interests. The Connecticut Compromise, adopted on July 16, 1787, aimed to address this issue by utilizing both forms of representation, providing proportional representation in the House and equal representation in the Senate.

Protecting against mob rule

James Madison played a crucial role in calling the Constitutional Convention of 1787, where he helped draft, explain, and ratify the Constitution. Madison's Virginia Plan, which offered a clear alternative to the Articles of Confederation, served as the basis for the convention's discussions. He sought to strengthen the federal government and address internal injustices within the states, particularly the tendency of state-level majorities to infringe on the rights of individuals and minorities.

Madison's efforts to protect against mob rule and promote deliberation on the public good are evident in several mechanisms he helped design as part of the Madisonian Constitution. These mechanisms were aimed at safeguarding against "personal ambition and the threat of governmental tyranny":

• Federalism: Madison endorsed the concept of federalism, where federal and state governments check and balance each other's power. He proposed a federal veto on state laws to protect individuals' rights, but this was not included in the final Constitution.
• Separation of Powers: Madison advocated for the institutional separation of powers among different branches of government, such as the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
• Checks and Balances: He believed in a system of checks and balances to prevent any one faction from dominating the legislative process. This included having factions check each other and ensuring that the House of Representatives had limited responsibilities, relying on the Senate to complete most actions.
• Bicameralism: Madison supported the idea of bicameralism, with two chambers in the legislative branch, each with distinct roles and powers.
• Selection of Senators and Presidents: Madison favoured selection processes for senators and presidents that included cooling mechanisms between them and the voting public. This was intended to prevent impulsive decisions driven by mob rule.
• Free Press and Education: Madison, a champion of freedom of speech and the press, understood that the proliferation of news outlets could educate the public about pressing issues, fostering a more informed electorate.

While Madison's vision for the Constitution aimed to protect against mob rule, he also believed that "the primary control on the government... remains always with the people." This reflects his understanding that democratic principles are essential, even as he sought to guard against the potential excesses of majority rule.

Promoting the public good

James Madison played a crucial role in calling the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, and in shaping the Virginia Plan, which offered a clear alternative to the Articles of Confederation. Madison sought to remedy the weaknesses of the federal government under the Articles of Confederation, but he was also concerned with addressing the internal injustices of states, where state-level majorities violated the rights of individuals and minorities.

Madison's plan, which favoured the large states and gave enormous power to a new federal government, became the nationalists' opening line of debate. After four months of debate and compromise, the Constitution of 1787 emerged. Madison's proposal to apply parts of the Bill of Rights to the states was eliminated, as was his change to the Constitution's preamble, which he thought would be enhanced by including a prefatory paragraph indicating that governmental power is vested by the people.

Madison's Constitution sought to enable factions to keep each other in check and to ensure that representatives focused on the public good. Madison endorsed a system of prudential devices, including institutional separation of powers, bicameralism, checks and balances, and federalism. These "inventions of prudence" were intended to "channel, check, and control the self-seeking personal motives of political office holders and thereby enable government to police itself".

Madison believed that the federal government under the proposed Constitution would better protect the rights of individuals and minorities. He argued that national legislation would be crafted by more political parties and interests than existed within the states, making it more difficult for any one faction to carry out its “plans of oppression”. Madison was especially concerned with the violation of property rights, but he also spoke of religious zeal as a dangerous source of conflict and oppression.

Madison's Constitution promoted the public good by protecting against mob rule and promoting deliberation. The concept of federalism, where federal and state governments check each other, was one such mechanism. Madison also advocated for limited responsibilities for the House of Representatives, the only aspect of the original constitutional system that allowed for direct election, and its dependence on the Senate to complete almost any action the House decides to initiate.

Explore related products

We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution

$31.99 $39.99

We The People: A Guide to American Democracy

$9.99

Libertys Blueprint: How Madison and Hamilton Wrote The Federalist, Defined the Constitution, and Made Democracy Safe for the World

$15.95 $26.95

The Declaration of Independence and United States Constitution with Bill of Rights and all Amendments (Annotated)

$0.99 $3.89

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

What Would Madison Do?: The Father of the Constitution Meets Modern American Politics

$23.4 $26

Preventing factionalism

James Madison played a crucial role in calling the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, and in shaping the Virginia Plan, which offered an alternative to the Articles of Confederation. Madison was dissatisfied with the weak national government established by the Articles of Confederation and sought to strengthen the republican government against democratic assembly.

Madison's plan, which favoured the large states and gave enormous power to a new federal government, became the nationalists' opening line of debate. However, he was equally concerned with remedying the internal injustices of states, such as the tendency of state-level majorities to violate the rights of individuals and minorities.

Madison's proposal to apply parts of the Bill of Rights to the states was eliminated, as was his change to the Constitution's preamble, which he thought would be enhanced by including a prefatory paragraph indicating that governmental power is vested by the people. He was disappointed that the Bill of Rights did not include protections against actions by state governments.

Madison's vision for the Constitution was one that sought to enable factions to keep each other in check and ensure that representatives focused on the public good. He endorsed a system of prudential devices, including institutional separation of powers, bicameralism, checks and balances, and federalism.

Federalism, in particular, was intended to have the federal and state governments check each other. Madison also proposed limited responsibilities for the House of Representatives, the only aspect of the original constitutional system that allowed for direct election, and its dependence on the Senate to complete almost any action the House decides to initiate.

Madison's ideas about factionalism were also influenced by his concern over state injustices and the violation of property rights. He argued that under the Constitution, Congress did not have the power to create a federally empowered national bank. He believed that the federal government under the proposed Constitution would better protect the rights of individuals and minorities because national legislation would be crafted by more political parties and interests than existed within the states, making it more difficult for any one faction to dominate.

Checks and balances

James Madison played a crucial role in calling the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, and in shaping the Virginia Plan, which offered a clear alternative to the Articles of Confederation. Madison sought to remedy the weaknesses of the federal government under the Articles of Confederation, but he was also concerned with addressing internal injustices at the state level, where state-level majorities often violated the rights of individuals and minorities.

Madison's plan, which favoured the large states and granted enormous power to a new federal government, became the nationalists' starting point for debate. After four months of debate and compromise, the Constitution of 1787 was born. Madison's Virginia Plan was the basis for the convention's discussions, and he later joined Alexander Hamilton and John Jay in writing The Federalist Papers, a series of pro-ratification essays that are still highly regarded in American political science.

Madison's vision for the Constitution was one that guarded against personal ambition and the threat of governmental tyranny. He endorsed a system of checks and balances, including institutional separation of powers, bicameralism, and federalism. These "inventions of prudence" were designed to "channel, check, and control the self-seeking personal motives of political office holders and thereby enable government to police itself".

One of the key aspects of Madison's vision for checks and balances was the concept of federalism, where the federal and state governments would check each other's power. He also envisioned limited responsibilities for the House of Representatives, with a dependence on the Senate to complete almost any action the House initiates. Madison also supported the idea of factions checking each other in the legislative process, preventing any one faction from dominating the process.

Despite his concerns over state injustices, Madison failed to include a federal veto on state laws in the Constitution, which he had hoped would "secure individuals against encroachments on their rights". However, he argued during the ratification debate that the federal government under the proposed Constitution would better protect the rights of individuals and minorities. Madison claimed that national legislation would involve more political parties and interests than state legislation, making it harder for any one faction to carry out oppressive plans.

Frequently asked questions