Who Counts As 'Others' In The Constitution?

The US Constitution affords its citizens many protections, and the word 'citizen' should not be taken literally. When the Constitution was drafted, immigration status was not a point of contention, and the word 'citizen' is meant to include residents, such as natural-born citizens, naturalized individuals, lawful permanent residents, and undocumented immigrants. The Constitution does not explicitly mention undocumented immigrants, but it does protect all people living in the United States, regardless of immigration status. Most constitutional provisions apply based on personhood, not citizenship. This means that if an individual is physically present in the US, they are entitled to the protections granted by the Constitution, including the right to due process and equal protection under the law.

Explore related products

On The Immorality of Illegal Immigration: A Priest Poses an Alternative Christian View

$14.49

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Constitution of the State of New York, 1821: Enriched edition. A Historical Legal Document of New York's Governance in 1821

$1.99 $11.95

Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law

$62.5

Societal and Legal Issues Surrounding Children Born in the United States to Illegal Alien Parents: Joint Hearing Before the Subcommittee on ... Committee on the Judiciary, House of Repres

$31.95

Constitution 2050

$2.99 $12.24

The right to due process

Due process means that a person cannot be deprived of their legal rights without the proper application of the law. In other words, a person cannot have their property taken away or be put in jail without first going through the legal system to determine if they are guilty of the crime they are accused of and the applicable punishment.

Undocumented immigrants in the US are afforded many rights under the Constitution, and while they are not specifically mentioned in the document, they are still protected by its principles. The Constitution protects all people living in the US, regardless of immigration status, as most provisions apply based on personhood, not citizenship. Therefore, undocumented immigrants have the right to due process and equal protection under the law.

In the context of immigration, due process often refers to the right of immigrants to have their defence heard before an immigration judge. Immigrants facing deportation have the right to legal representation, and the government must provide them with an attorney if they cannot afford one. However, since most deportation proceedings are civil rather than criminal, the right to counsel is not always guaranteed.

The issue of due process is at the heart of many immigration cases, such as Reno v. Flores, a 1993 Supreme Court case that gained prominence amid a surge in family separations. The case resulted in an agreement requiring the government to release children to their parents, a relative, or a licensed program within 20 days. In the ruling, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, "it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings".

It is important to note that while undocumented immigrants have the right to due process, they may still be subject to expedited removal proceedings if they have been in the country illegally for less than two years and are apprehended within 100 miles of the US border. In such cases, they may be deported without a hearing before an immigration judge.

The right to legal counsel

Firstly, it is important to understand that the US Constitution applies to all individuals within the country, regardless of their immigration status. The Constitution uses the terms "people" or "person" rather than "citizen", and legal experts argue that these laws apply to everyone physically present in the US. This means that undocumented immigrants are entitled to basic legal protections and constitutional rights.

In terms of legal counsel, the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to legal representation in criminal proceedings. This means that if an undocumented immigrant is facing criminal charges, they have the right to an attorney, either through private means or a court-appointed lawyer. This is because the Sixth Amendment states that "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall... have the assistance of counsel for his defence".

However, when it comes to deportation proceedings, the right to legal counsel is less clear-cut. Deportation proceedings are typically considered civil matters rather than criminal, and as such, the right to counsel is not always guaranteed. The government is generally only required to provide counsel if the person is accused of a felony, and crossing the border illegally is considered a misdemeanour. Nevertheless, undocumented immigrants facing deportation still have the right to hire an attorney, and if they cannot afford one, the government must provide them with legal representation.

Undocumented immigrants also have other rights that are important to be aware of. For example, they have the right to remain silent and do not have to discuss their immigration status with police, immigration agents, or other officials. They also have the right to refuse searches of their person or belongings without a warrant or probable cause, and they can deny entry to their home without a valid warrant.

In summary, while undocumented immigrants in the US do have a right to legal counsel in criminal proceedings, the situation is more complex when it comes to deportation proceedings. Nonetheless, they are still entitled to basic legal protections and can seek legal representation if needed.

The right to education

The United States Constitution is the document that contains the fundamental laws governing the country and has been considered the "supreme law of the land" since 1789. While the framers of the Constitution did not have the "legal status" of those living in the United States in mind, the document extends basic human rights to its citizens.

The Constitution does not expressly guarantee the right to education. However, in the landmark case of Plyler v. Doe, the U.S. Supreme Court held that states cannot deny students free public education based on their immigration status. The Court's decision was based on the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that "No State shall [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The Court found that denying undocumented children an education would impose greater harms on society than any resources saved by excluding them from public schools.

The Supreme Court has also extended the Fourth Amendment right to protection from unreasonable searches and seizures to undocumented immigrants. This means that the government cannot enter an individual's home or search their belongings without a warrant or probable cause. However, there is a “border search exception," which allows the government to conduct warrantless searches within a 100-mile radius of any U.S. border.

Undocumented immigrants are afforded many rights under the Constitution, and the Court has upheld that certain constitutional rights extend to everyone living within the U.S., not just citizens or legal immigrants. For example, the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to due process, and the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to legal counsel in criminal proceedings. Additionally, the right to live with one's family is recognized as a fundamental human right, protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

In conclusion, while the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly guarantee the right to education, the Supreme Court has interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment to include this right for undocumented children, ensuring their access to free public education regardless of their immigration status.

Explore related products

We Can Save America: Standing up for national security, law enforcement, capitalism, and the Constitution

$0.99 $9.99

Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789–2010 [2 volumes]

$16 $182

Immigration Law: A Quickstudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.95

Immigration Law and Procedure in a Nutshell (Nutshells)

$62

Immigration Law Pocket Field Guide 2025 Edition [LATEST EDITION]

$50

Immigration Law for Beginners Guide: Easy-to-Follow Steps to Successfully Navigate Immigration Law, Simplifying the Path to Legal Residency and Citizenship for First-Time Applicants and Immigrants

$14.99

Voting rights

The topic of immigration has been at the forefront of political platforms in recent years, with misconceptions about immigrants' rights in the United States widespread. The US Constitution, considered the "supreme law of the land" since 1789, extends basic human rights to its citizens. The Constitution does not prohibit anyone from voting; instead, it outlines who cannot be denied the right to vote.

The 14th Amendment states that male US citizens over 21 years of age must be allowed to vote unless they have committed a crime. The 15th Amendment prohibits the denial of the right to vote based on race, and the 19th Amendment prohibits denying the right to vote based on sex. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention "illegal immigrants," it is worth noting that the framers of the Constitution did not consider "legal status" when drafting the document. The word "citizens" is meant to include residents, encompassing natural-born citizens, naturalized individuals, lawful permanent residents, and undocumented immigrants.

In terms of voting rights, Congress passed a law prohibiting illegal immigrants from voting for specific offices, including the President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, and Resident Commissioner. This law aligns with the understanding that the Constitution does not grant voting rights based on citizenship but rather specifies who cannot be denied the right to vote.

Undocumented immigrants have certain rights under the Constitution, including due process rights. The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process, stating that "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law." The Sixth Amendment provides the right to legal counsel in criminal proceedings, and the Fourteenth Amendment ensures equal protection under the law for all persons, regardless of immigration status.

In summary, while the term "illegal immigrants" is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, the document extends certain rights, including due process and equal protection, to all individuals within the United States, regardless of their immigration status. Congress has specifically prohibited illegal immigrants from voting for certain offices, but the broader understanding of voting rights in the Constitution is based on who cannot be denied the right to vote rather than citizenship status.

The right to familial association

In the context of immigration, the right to familial association means that the US government cannot arbitrarily separate families or deny them the opportunity to reunite. This right has been used to challenge various immigration laws and policies, including the Trump administration's family separation policy. The Supreme Court has upheld that certain constitutional rights, such as the right to due process and the right to be with one's family, extend to everyone within the US, regardless of their immigration status.

However, it is important to note that undocumented immigrants do not have the same rights as US citizens and legal residents. For example, they do not have a guaranteed right to legal counsel in deportation proceedings, as these are considered civil matters rather than criminal ones. Nonetheless, if an undocumented immigrant faces criminal charges, they are entitled to legal representation, and the government must provide an attorney if they cannot afford one.

The issue of family separation at the border and the right to familial association has gained significant attention in recent years, with the surge in family separations under the Trump administration's "zero-tolerance" immigration policy. This policy led to a 1993 Supreme Court case, Reno v. Flores, which required the government to release children to their parents, a relative, or a licensed program within 20 days.

In conclusion, while the right to familial association is not explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution, it is recognised as a fundamental human right and has been upheld by the Supreme Court. This right applies to everyone within the US, including illegal immigrants, and serves to protect families from arbitrary separation and ensure their right to reunite.

Frequently asked questions