License Agreement Absence: Fraud Or Not?

does not presenting a license agreement constitute fraud

A licensing agreement is a contract that gives permission to one party (the licensee) to use the intellectual property of another party (the owner or licensor). The agreement will stipulate the conditions of use and the compensation to be paid to the owner, called royalties. A breach of a licensing agreement can result in a claim for copyright infringement or a breach of contract. Contract fraud occurs when a person knowingly makes a false statement to deceive or trick the other party into signing a contract that they may not otherwise have agreed to. If a party fails to uphold their end of the deal, a breach of contract occurs. However, if a person or business makes misleading or deceitful statements to induce another party to enter into a contract, and that party suffers damages or losses, the deceptive party is committing contract fraud.

Characteristics Values
Contract fraud Occurs when a person knowingly makes a false statement to have someone else agree to a contract
Intent To deceive or trick the other person into signing a contract that they may not otherwise agree to
Mutual assent An agreement made by both contracting parties regarding the subject matter of the offer, and what the contract’s terms mean
Consent Both parties must freely consent to entering into the contract, meaning neither party can enter into the contract while under duress
Mutual contract consideration Consideration refers to the exchange of something of value from one party, in return for a promise or service provided by the other party
Types of fraud Fraud in the inducement, or fraudulent inducement, refers to contract fraud wherein one party makes a decision based on misleading information; fraud in the factum, or fraud in the fact, occurs when a party enters into the agreement based on a fraudulent misrepresentation

cycivic

Fraudulent misrepresentation

To establish fraudulent misrepresentation, it must be shown that there was a material statement of a particular fact, and this fact induced the party to enter into the contract. The misrepresentation can be verbal or written and could occur in emails, advertising content, discussions, promotions, or exaggerated claims. It could also be implied, provided that a reasonable person would have drawn a similar inference from the words or conduct.

If you believe you are the victim of fraudulent misrepresentation, it is recommended to seek legal advice promptly. An experienced business lawyer can help you understand your options and protect your rights. They will assist in gathering substantial evidence to support your claim and determine the best course of action, which may include rescission of the contract, rendering it voidable.

cycivic

Fraud in the inducement

For instance, if a car dealer sells a car with a known defect that affects its safety without disclosing it to the buyer, even if the buyer specifically asks about the car's accident report, the dealer might be liable for fraud in the inducement if they lie and state that the car has no defects or has never been in an accident.

To prove fraudulent inducement, a party must demonstrate that the misleading statements that induced them to execute the contract were not integrated into the contract. This can be complex, and the legal requirements to prove or defend against such a case remain the same, but the issues can be intricate and involve large sums of money. For instance, mergers and acquisitions, accounting irregularities, and antitrust matters may all implicate issues related to fraud in the inducement.

In the context of a breach of contract, the fraud claim is referred to as fraudulent inducement. A party can allege that they would not have entered into the contract if the other party had not made fraudulent misrepresentations or had disclosed material information before the contract was executed.

It is important to note that state laws may vary in terms of what constitutes contract fraud and the limits on recovery. Therefore, it is advisable to consult with an experienced local contract lawyer to understand your specific legal options and rights.

cycivic

Fraud in the factum

To establish fraud in the factum, several elements must be considered. These include misrepresentation, materiality, intent, justifiable reliance, and damages. The courts will examine the sophistication level of the defrauded party, the intent to deceive, any misleading statements or concealment of the true nature of the document, and proof that the fraud caused measurable harm.

It is important to note that fraud in the factum does not always render a contract void; instead, it may result in the dismissal of contractual duties or the recovery of compensatory and punitive damages, including mental anguish and attorney fees.

In summary, fraud in the factum occurs when deception or misrepresentation leads a party to sign a contract without fully understanding its nature and consequences. It is a legal defence that can have significant implications for the enforceability of the contract and the potential liability of the deceiving party.

cycivic

Licensing agreement breach

A licensing agreement is a contract between the owner of certain rights (the "licensor") and someone who wants permission to use those rights (the "licensee"). The licensee can seek to profit from the licensor's intellectual property without investing in its research and development. The agreement will stipulate the conditions of use and the compensation to be paid to the owner, called royalties.

If you believe that a licensing agreement has been breached, it is important to consult a licensing agreement attorney who can advise on the best course of action. There are several factors that will determine the nature of the case and the potential remedies available.

Firstly, it is important to establish whether the licensing agreement was for exclusive or non-exclusive use. If the licensor conveys exclusive use of the IP to the licensee, the licensee holds temporary and limited ownership rights to that IP. Therefore, unlicensed use of an exclusive license will result in a breach of contract, whereas unlicensed use of a non-exclusive license may constitute infringement.

Secondly, it is necessary to determine whether the breached provision was a "condition" or a "covenant". If the provision was a condition, then the contract effectively does not exist, and any use of the IP would result in infringement. If the provision was a covenant, then the breach would result in a breach of contract.

Thirdly, it is worth considering whether the license agreement is limited in scope and whether the licensee has acted outside the scope. If so, the licensor can bring an action for infringement, provided they can establish that the license terms are limitations on the scope of the license, and that the licensee's actions exceed the scope of the license.

There are two possible legal strategies that can be pursued in the event of a breach of a licensing agreement, which can result in distinct remedies:

  • Injunctive relief: A court order instructing the breaching party to cease the infringement activity
  • Monetary damages: These can include compensatory, consequential, and exemplary damages, as well as attorney's fees in some cases.

It is important to note that there are statutes of limitations that dictate the timeframe within which a legal claim must be filed. Failing to adhere to these timeframes may result in the loss of the right to pursue a legal remedy.

cycivic

Contract invalidity

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two private parties. For a contract to be valid, it must meet certain conditions. If a contract is invalid, it can expose you to lawsuits and liabilities.

A contract is invalid if the subject matter is illegal or against public policy. For example, if an employee signs an employment contract and is then asked to perform an illegal job, the contract is immediately void.

A contract is also invalid if it is made under duress, meaning that parties must voluntarily consent to be bound by the agreement without coercion or intimidation. If any party is compelled to enter into the contract against their will, it will be invalidated.

Additionally, substantive unconscionability will make a contract invalid. This is when the terms of a contract are harsh, unfair, excessively oppressive, and unduly one-sided.

Oral contracts are as valid and enforceable as written contracts. However, under the Statute of Frauds, certain types of contracts must be in writing to be valid, such as contracts for the sale or transfer of an interest in land. For a contract to comply with the Statute of Frauds, the writing must contain key elements such as the names of the contracting parties, terms and conditions, and subject matter, and the contracting parties must also sign it.

If you believe you have been a victim of contract fraud, you should consult with an experienced and local contract lawyer as soon as possible. Contract fraud involves intentional misrepresentation that affects the agreement's terms. It occurs when a person knowingly makes a false statement to deceive or trick the other person into signing a contract that they may not otherwise agree to.

Frequently asked questions

Contract fraud occurs when a person knowingly makes a false statement to have someone else agree to a contract. This act intends to deceive or trick the other person into signing a contract that they may not otherwise agree to.

Contract fraud can be categorised into two types: fraud in the inducement and fraud in the factum. Fraud in the inducement refers to contract fraud where one party bases their decision on misleading information. Fraud in the factum occurs when a party enters an agreement based on a fraudulent misrepresentation, causing them to misunderstand the nature of what they are agreeing to.

A licensing agreement is a contract between the owner of rights ("licensor") and someone who wants permission to use those rights ("licensee"). The licensor gives permission to the licensee to use their intellectual property, such as a brand, patent, software, or trademark, in exchange for compensation.

A breach of a licensing agreement can result in either a breach of contract or a claim for copyright infringement. If the breach is based on unlicensed use of an exclusive license, it is typically considered a breach of contract. If the license is nonexclusive, unlicensed use may constitute copyright infringement.

If you believe you have been a victim of contract fraud, you should consult an experienced contract lawyer as soon as possible. They can help you understand your legal options and gather evidence to support your claim.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment