Locke's Stance On Constitutional Monarchy: A Philosophical Inquiry

John Locke (1632-1704) was an Enlightenment-era British philosopher whose writings were highly influential to the constitutional framers of the United States. Locke's political philosophy was rooted in the principle of self-ownership and the right to own property, and he argued that the purpose of government should be to secure the life and property of its citizens. While Locke believed in a social contract between rulers and ruled, he favoured monarchy over democracy and considered the king's power to be heavily limited by constitutional obligations. Locke's views on the role of government and the social contract have sparked debates, with some interpreting him as a constitutionalist and others as granting unlimited power to majorities.

Explore related products

Second Treatise on Government

$9.99

Two Treaties of Government

$9.12

The Reception of Locke's Politics: From the 1690s to the 1830s (Pickering Masters.)

$69.99

Two Treatises of Government

$17.99 $8.99

Locke On Civil Government and Filmer's Patriarcha

$47.95

Two Treatises of Government

$0.99 $6.85

Locke's conception of political philosophy

John Locke (1632-1704) is considered one of the most influential political philosophers of the modern era. His political philosophy is centred on the concept of natural law and natural rights, which existed long before Locke but were popularised by him. Locke's philosophy revolves around the idea that individuals in a state of nature are not subject to a common legitimate authority and are free and equal. This freedom and equality are based on the law of nature, which assumes that all people are equal and have certain general obligations and rights.

Locke's philosophy stresses the importance of individual consent as the mechanism by which political societies are created and individuals join them. He argues that one can only become a full member of society by an act of express consent. This theory of consent has been the subject of debate, with some arguing that it leads towards "philosophical anarchism", as most people have not actually consented to their governments. However, Locke also acknowledges the role of tacit consent, where continued residence in a society implies consent to its government.

Locke's conception of political power is closely tied to his theory of punishment. He defines political power as "a right of making laws with penalties of death, and consequently all less Penalties". He argues that punishment requires the existence of a law, and since the state of nature is governed by the law of nature, individuals can punish each other even before the establishment of a government.

Locke's philosophy is also based on the principle of self-ownership and the right to own property. He proposed that a man earns ownership over a resource by mixing his labour with it. He argued that the primary role of government should be to secure the life and property of its citizens and that governments derive their legitimacy from the consent of the governed. Locke was critical of absolute monarchy and patriarchalism, refuting the theory of the divine right of kings. Instead, he advocated for a separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.

Locke's economic philosophy was mercantilist, arguing that the end of trade is "riches and power". He believed that trade increases a nation's wealth and population, creating a virtuous circle of economic improvement. However, he also held a cynical view of power, recognising the tendency of politicians to increase their own wealth and power at the expense of the people.

The social contract

John Locke (1632-1704) was an Enlightenment-era British philosopher whose writings were highly influential to the constitutional framers of the United States. Locke's views on the social contract were informed by his belief in the inalienable rights of all people to "life, liberty, and property". He argued that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that exist independently of the laws of any particular society.

Locke's conception of the social contract can be understood as a solution to the problem of political obligation. He proposed that legitimate political government is the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government. This transfer of rights is done to better ensure the stable and comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. The government, in turn, is responsible for securing the life, liberty, and property of its citizens. Locke's theory thus places significant limitations on the power of the ruler and provides inalienable rights for the ruled.

Locke's understanding of the social contract is also connected to his views on consent. He argued that governments exist by the consent of the people and that the people have the right to resist and replace governments that fail to protect their rights and promote the public good. This belief in the consent of the governed is further reflected in his support for constitutional monarchy, where the power of the king is heavily limited by constitutional obligations to ensure the fair and just treatment of citizens. Locke's preference for monarchy over democracy has been interpreted as a reflection of his conservative views on human nature, though he was also considered liberal for his time.

Locke's political philosophy was shaped by his engagement with the political and religious debates of his time. He was an advocate for the primacy of civil institutions in defining the nation's religious culture and supported the Acts of Supremacy and the Elizabethan Act of Uniformity. Locke also grappled with the contradiction between obeying the magistrate and following one's conscience, ultimately prioritizing the freedom of conscience. His writings on toleration espoused the right to freedom of conscience and religion, except when religion was deemed intolerant.

The role of consent

John Locke (1632-1704) was an Enlightenment-era philosopher whose writings were highly influential to the constitutional framers of the United States. Locke's views on the role of consent in government are outlined in his "Two Treatises of Government", where he argues that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that exist independently of any particular society's laws.

Locke believed that legitimate political government arises from a social contract in which people in a state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable and comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. This social contract theory of government emphasizes the role of consent, as governments exist by the consent of the people and are meant to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good. Locke's conception of consent as the foundation of political obligation sets him apart from other political philosophers of his time.

In Locke's view, the king or monarch only holds the power to rule if those ruled consent to it. This belief in the consent of the governed heavily limits the power of the ruler and provides inalienable rights for the ruled. Locke's ideas on consent and social contract theory were particularly influential in the development of the American Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which established limits on the powers of the monarchy and reserved powers for Parliament.

While Locke supported the idea of constitutional monarchy, he was also critical of the monarchy's power. He rejected the notion of absolute monarchy and the belief in the divine right of kings, arguing instead that political power should maintain the equality of all. Locke's understanding of paternal power, or the power exerted by the monarchy, should not be confused with legitimate political power, as it assumes that all people are not equal. This distinction is important in understanding Locke's view of the limited role of the monarchy in a constitutional framework.

Explore related products

Human Rights (Key Concepts)

$24.95 $24.95

Areopagitica and Other Prose Works (Dover Thrift Editions: Philosophy)

$3.65 $8

The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton Classics)

$29.58 $35

John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty: Mixed Monarchy and the Right of Resistance in the Political Thought of the English Revolution (Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics)

$45

Locke & Key: Keys to the Kingdom, Vol. 4

$17.27 $19.99

Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government

$58

The power of the monarch

John Locke (1632-1704) was an Enlightenment-era philosopher whose writings were highly influential to the constitutional framers of the United States. Locke's views on the power of the monarch were shaped by his belief in a social contract between rulers and the ruled, which limited the power of the ruler and provided inalienable rights for the ruled. Locke argued that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that are independent of the laws of any particular society. He proposed that government should be limited to securing the life and property of its citizens and that it is only necessary to address the problems that arise in an ideal, anarchic state of nature.

Locke rejected the idea of absolute monarchy and the belief in the divine right of kings. He refuted the idea of patriarchalism, or the belief in the absolute power of monarchies, and instead argued that legitimate political government is the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government. This contract is based on the consent of the governed, and the government exists to protect the rights of its citizens and promote the public good. Locke believed that the king only held the power to rule if those ruled consented to it.

Locke's understanding of paternal power, or the power exerted by the monarchy, was that it should never be confused with legitimate political power. He argued that all people are equal, and this equality is essential to political power, which must maintain the equality of all. Children, on the other hand, are not considered equal under paternal power because they lack the ability to reason. Locke also criticised hereditary monarchy, suggesting that it was the love of liberty among the English parliamentary classes that led them to resist attempts by their monarchs to encroach on their traditional liberties.

Locke's views on the power of the monarch were shaped by his experiences during a turbulent period in British political culture, including the English Civil War (1642-51) and the subsequent restoration of the monarchy. He lived in exile in Holland for a period and witnessed the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which helped bring stability to the British government. Despite his liberal views on the rights of citizens, Locke was still conservative by modern standards, favouring monarchy over democracy. However, his ideas about the limited power of the monarch and the importance of consent were radical for his time and had a significant impact on political philosophy and the development of constitutional government.

The rights of the ruled

John Locke (1632-1704) was an Enlightenment-era philosopher whose ideas were highly influential to the Constitutional Framers of the United States. Locke's political philosophy was grounded in the principle of self-ownership and the right to own property. He argued that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that exist independently of the laws of any particular society.

Locke's conception of political philosophy was based on the idea of a social contract between rulers and the ruled. This contract, Locke argued, was formed when people in a state of nature conditionally transferred some of their rights to the government to ensure the stable and comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. The government, according to Locke, exists by the consent of the governed, and its primary role is to secure the life and property of its citizens.

In his writings, Locke vehemently rejected the idea of absolute monarchy and patriarchalism, which was advocated by 17th-century philosopher Sir Robert Filmer. Locke argued that the power of the monarch should be heavily limited by constitutional obligations to ensure the fair and just treatment of citizens. He believed that the king's power to rule was contingent on the consent of those ruled. This view is reflected in Locke's understanding of paternal power, which he distinguished from legitimate political power. Paternal power, according to Locke, assumes that all people are not equal, whereas political power must maintain the equality of all.

Locke's ideas on the rights of the ruled had a significant impact on political thought and the development of constitutional monarchies. He asserted that "the natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power," which implicitly rejected slavery in the context of a monarchy. However, it is important to note that Locke's views on human nature were still conservative by modern standards, as he favoured monarchy over democracy. Nonetheless, within the context of his time, Locke was considered liberal in his political theory.

Frequently asked questions