How The Spanish-American War Influenced The Us Constitution

The Spanish-American War was fought between the United States and Spain in 1898, and it had a significant impact on the constitutional landscape in both countries. The war was sparked by Cuba's struggle for independence from Spain, with sensationalized American media coverage fuelling humanitarian concerns and swaying public opinion in favour of intervention. The US victory resulted in the acquisition of new territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines, which raised constitutional questions about the application of the US Constitution in these areas. The war also had constitutional implications for Cuba, with the US influencing the drafting of the Cuban Constitution through the Platt Amendment, which effectively made Cuba a US protectorate. The Spanish-American War marked the end of Spain's colonial power in the New World and had lasting consequences for the constitutional and geopolitical landscapes of the affected nations.

Explore related products

The Spanish War: An American Epic 1898

$20.99 $28.95

Empire by Default: The Spanish-American War and the Dawn of the American Century

$36.38

The Crowded Hour: Theodore Roosevelt, the Rough Riders, and the Dawn of the American Century

$10.16 $20

The War Lovers: Roosevelt, Lodge, Hearst, and the Rush to Empire, 1898

$11.11 $19.99

The Spanish-American War and Philippine Insurrection: 1898–1902 (Men-at-Arms, 437)

$20

The Roughest Riders: The Untold Story of the Black Soldiers in the Spanish-American War

$16.41 $26.95

The US Constitution and the acquisition of new territories

The Spanish-American War, fought between the United States and Spain, lasted from April 21 to December 10, 1898. The conflict arose from Cuba's struggle for independence from Spain, with sensationalised American newspapers fuelling public outrage and support for the Cuban rebels. The war ended with a peace treaty, the Treaty of Paris, which compelled Spain to cede several of its overseas territories to the United States. These newly acquired territories included Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines, while Cuba was guaranteed independence but became a de facto US protectorate.

The acquisition of these new territories by the United States raised constitutional questions about the application of the US Constitution in these areas. This led to a set of cases known as the Insular Cases, which addressed the extent to which the individual rights guaranteed in the Constitution applied to the inhabitants of the newly acquired territories. The US Constitution was thus impacted by the Spanish-American War and the subsequent expansion of US territorial holdings.

The war resulted in a significant shift in global power dynamics, marking the end of Spain's role as a colonial power in the New World and propelling the United States onto the world stage as a major power. The United States gained several island possessions spanning the globe, including territories in the Americas, Asia, and the Pacific. This provoked debates about the wisdom of expansionism and the implications for US foreign policy and engagement with the wider world.

The specific constitutional questions that arose following the Spanish-American War centred on the rights and status of the inhabitants of the newly acquired territories. The Insular Cases addressed issues such as the application of constitutional rights, the extent of congressional power over these territories, and the relationship between the US government and the local populations. The outcomes of these cases had lasting implications for the governance of US territories and the interpretation of the Constitution in relation to territorial acquisitions.

In addition to the legal and constitutional implications, the Spanish-American War also had a significant impact on US foreign policy and diplomatic relations. The war marked a turning point in US interventionism, with the country actively asserting its military and diplomatic influence in international affairs. The establishment of a de facto protectorate over Cuba, the annexation of Hawaii, and the acquisition of permanent naval bases, such as Guantanamo Bay, all contributed to a more assertive and expansionist US foreign policy in the years that followed.

The Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States (VFW)

The Spanish-American War, fought between the United States and Spain in 1898, had a significant impact on the Constitution and led to several constitutional questions. One of the key issues that arose was how the Constitution would apply to the newly acquired US territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines. This set the stage for a series of court cases known as the Insular Cases, which addressed the extent to which constitutional rights apply to the inhabitants of these territories.

The VFW has been dedicated to serving veterans, active-duty military personnel, and their families for over a century. Its members have volunteered millions of hours and donated millions of dollars to honor and support veterans. The organization also promotes patriotism and celebrates the freedoms enjoyed in America.

In addition to the direct impact on veterans' affairs, the Spanish-American War had broader constitutional implications. For example, it led to the Food and Fuel Control Act, also known as the Lever Act, which granted the President substantial authority over domestic food and fuel production during World War I. The Supreme Court later ruled that some provisions of this Act were unconstitutionally vague, demonstrating the complex interplay between war, legislation, and constitutional interpretation.

The role of the press in swaying public opinion

The Spanish-American War, fought between the United States and Spain in 1898, was a significant event that led to the United States acquiring territories in Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines, and establishing a protectorate over Cuba. This war was also notable for the role played by the press in swaying public opinion and pushing for American involvement in the conflict.

The late 19th century witnessed a vibrant and highly competitive media scene, with improvements in printing technology making it easier than ever to publish and distribute newspapers. This led to a saturated newspaper market, with publications vying for readers' attention. A notable aspect of this era was the emergence of "yellow journalism" or "yellow press," characterised by sensationalism, bold typography, imaginative illustrations, and self-promotion. The term "yellow journalism" originated from the rivalry between newspaper giants Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst and their respective publications, the New York World and the New York Journal.

Pulitzer and Hearst were accused of using their publications to fan anti-Spanish sentiments and push for war. For example, when the USS Maine sank in Havana Harbour in 1898, sober observers and initial reports suggested an internal explosion. However, Pulitzer and Hearst published rumours of Spanish plots to sink the ship, later seizing on a naval investigation that attributed the explosion to a mine. This shift in blame towards Spain was picked up by other newspapers, with headlines calling for action and goading President McKinley and the military to respond.

The press's role in shaping public opinion during this period is exemplified by the coverage of events in Cuba, where Cuban nationalists had been waging a revolt against Spanish rule since 1895. The Spanish military leadership's adoption of brutal tactics, such as the reconcentration policy implemented by General Valeriano Weyler, fuelled anti-Spanish propaganda in the United States. While historians debate the extent of the press's influence, it is clear that yellow journalism contributed to shaping public sentiment and, by extension, political decisions regarding the war.

In conclusion, while other factors also played a role in the outbreak of the Spanish-American War, the press undoubtedly had a significant part in swaying public opinion and creating a climate conducive to war. The rivalry between Pulitzer and Hearst and their use of sensationalism to boost sales demonstrated the power of the media to capture the attention of a large readership and influence public reaction to international events.

Explore related products

Manila and Santiago: The New Steel Navy in the Spanish-American War

$17.25 $31.95

Spanish-American War: The Conflict That Transformed America's Global Role

$3.99 $7.99

The Wars of Spanish American Independence 1809–29 (Essential Histories, 77)

$24

US Navy Battleships 1886–98: The pre-dreadnoughts and monitors that fought the Spanish-American War (New Vanguard, 271)

$19.77

Spain In Our Hearts: Americans in the Spanish Civil War, 1936–1939

$10.49 $24.99

The Spanish-Cuban-American War and the Birth of American Imperialism, Vol. 1 1895-1898 (Modern reader)

$25

The McKinley Administration's annexation of Hawaii

The Spanish-American War did not lead to Supreme Court decisions regarding the Declare War Clause, but it did spark other constitutional debates. One such question was how the Constitution would apply to territories acquired by the US from Spain, including Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. This acquisition of new territories led to a set of cases known as the Insular Cases, which addressed the applicability of individual rights guaranteed in the Constitution to the inhabitants of these territories.

Now, regarding the McKinley Administration's annexation of Hawaii, the context is as follows:

In 1892, two months before the initial moves to overthrow the Hawaiian Government and transfer Hawaiian territory to the US, a letter was sent to the Secretary of State arguing for annexation on moral, political, and economic grounds. The letter criticized the existing Hawaiian monarchy, characterizing it as an "absurd anachronism" and an impediment to good governance and progress. It emphasized the loss to Hawaiian sugar interests due to the McKinley bill and the potential for further depreciation of sugar property.

In 1893, President Grover Cleveland withdrew the Hawaiian annexation treaty, taking into consideration the report of a special commissioner that proponents of annexation were primarily sugar planters, while the majority of the Hawaiian population opposed it. Cleveland advocated for the restoration of the queen, but the provisional government rejected this proposal.

In June and July 1897, Queen Liliuokalani of Hawaii protested against the ratification of a treaty that Messrs. Hatch and Thurston had signed in Washington. She communicated her objections to US President William McKinley and Secretary of State John Sherman.

The McKinley Administration's pursuit of the annexation of Hawaii reflected a belief in the benefits of integrating the islands into the American civilization and destiny. This perspective considered annexation as a bold and vigorous measure that would bring advantages to both Hawaii and the United States.

The Platt Amendment and US-Cuba relations

The Platt Amendment was a treaty between the US and Cuba that attempted to protect Cuba's independence from foreign intervention. It was approved on May 22, 1903, and permitted extensive US involvement in Cuban international and domestic affairs for the enforcement of Cuban independence. The Amendment was a result of the US victory in the Spanish-American War of 1898, which ended almost four centuries of Spanish presence in the Americas, Asia, and the Pacific. The war began with the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor in Cuba and resulted in the US acquiring sovereignty over Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines, and establishing a protectorate over Cuba.

The Platt Amendment was initially intended to be its own bill, but it became an amendment as the 56th Congress ended on March 4, 1901, and there was no time for the proposal to be submitted as a separate bill. It was drafted by Secretary of War Elihu Root and Senator Orville Platt of Connecticut, who chaired the Senate Committee with Relations on Cuba. The Amendment was added to the earlier Teller Amendment, which had limited US involvement in Cuba, particularly in preventing its annexation. The Platt Amendment, however, permitted the US to lease or buy lands for the purpose of establishing naval bases (the main one being Guantanamo Bay) and coaling stations in Cuba. It also barred Cuba from going into debt, making a treaty that would give another nation power over its affairs, or stopping the US from imposing a sanitation program on the island.

The Amendment further stipulated that the Cuban government must consent to the right of the US to intervene in Cuban affairs for "the preservation of Cuban independence, the maintenance of a government adequate for the protection of life, property, and individual liberty". It outlined the role of the US in Cuba and the Caribbean, limiting Cuba's right to make treaties with other nations and restricting Cuba in the conduct of foreign policy and commercial relations. It also established that Cuba's boundaries would not include the Isle of Pines until its title could be established in a future treaty.

The Platt Amendment supplied the terms under which the US intervened in Cuban affairs in 1906, 1912, 1917, and 1920. By 1934, rising Cuban nationalism and widespread criticism of the Amendment resulted in its repeal as part of Franklin D. Roosevelt's Good Neighbor policy toward Latin America. The US, however, retained its lease on Guantanamo Bay, where a naval base remains operational today.

Frequently asked questions